arXiv subjects

Yanyi Pu

Publications and source records attributed to Yanyi Pu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

How Much is a Human Right Worth? ECtHR-NPD: A Benchmark for Predicting Non-Pecuniary Damage Awards

Existing legal benchmarks cover diverse tasks, while continuous monetary remedies remain comparatively underexplored. We introduce ECtHR-NPD, to the best of our knowledge, the first benchmark for predicting non-pecuniary damage (NPD) awards at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) from case information when no statutory formula or explicit calculation rule determines the amount. ECtHR-NPD contains 14,575 cases with case-level awards in nominal euros, chronological splits, and a protocol separating target construction from model input. We evaluate a battery of methods, including constant predictors, gradient-boosted trees, retrieval methods, fine-tuned encoder language models (LMs), prompted decoder LMs, and knowledge-augmented agents. Our results show that more sophisticated LM and agentic approaches do not consistently outperform the strongest feature-based baseline. All model families struggle to identify zero awards and to calibrate high-award predictions, with further degradation on the Challenging test view, making ECtHR-NPD a challenging testbed for current state-of-the-art open-weight and proprietary LMs.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Exploring Time Granularity on Temporal Graphs for Dynamic Link Prediction in Real-world Networks

Dynamic Graph Neural Networks (DGNNs) have emerged as the predominant approach for processing dynamic graph-structured data. However, the influence of temporal information on model performance and robustness remains insufficiently explored, particularly regarding how models address prediction tasks with different time granularities. In this paper, we explore the impact of time granularity when training DGNNs on dynamic graphs through extensive experiments. We examine graphs derived from various domains and compare three different DGNNs to the baseline model across four varied time granularities. We mainly consider the interplay between time granularities, model architectures, and negative sampling strategies to obtain general conclusions. Our results reveal that a sophisticated memory mechanism and proper time granularity are crucial for a DGNN to deliver competitive and robust performance in the dynamic link prediction task. We also discuss drawbacks in considered models and datasets and propose promising directions for future research on the time granularity of temporal graphs.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Generation of Explanations for Logic Reasoning

This thesis delves into a fortiori arguments in deductive reasoning, underscoring their relevance in various domains such as law, philosophy, and artificial intelligence. The research is centred on employing GPT-3.5-turbo to automate the analysis of these arguments, with a focus on understanding intricate reasoning processes, generating clear and coherent explanations, and creating novel arguments. The methodology encompasses a series of tasks including detailed reasoning, interpretation, and the augmentation of a fortiori arguments. It involves meticulously identifying these arguments in diverse contexts, differentiating comparative elements, and categorizing them based on their logical structure. Extensive experiments reveals the challenges encountered by GPT-3.5-turbo in accurately detecting and classifying a fortiori arguments. Nevertheless, the model demonstrates a performance that rivals specialized models, particularly in extracting key components and interpreting underlying properties. The integration of external information into the model's processing significantly elevates the quality of the generated explanations. Additionally, the model exhibits a noteworthy capability in augmenting arguments, thus contributing to the enrichment of the data set. Despite facing certain limitations, this thesis makes significant contributions to the fields of artificial intelligence and logical reasoning. It introduces novel methodologies, establishes a rigorous evaluation framework, and provides deep insights that set the stage for future advancements in automated logical reasoning. The findings and methodologies presented herein not only underscore the potential of AI in complex reasoning tasks but also highlight areas for future research and development.

cs.AI↗