arXiv subjects

Xushi Li

Publications and source records attributed to Xushi Li.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

FlashOffloading: Low-Latency KV Cache Offloading for Long-Context LLM Serving

In large language model (LLM) serving systems, the key-value (KV) cache grows linearly with sequence length and concurrency, so long-context inference easily hits the high-bandwidth memory (HBM) capacity wall and results in low concurrency. Offloading the KV cache to host dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) frees HBM space and raises concurrency, but the additional cache management and host-to-device (H2D) load overhead inflates inference latency, higher concurrency fails to translate into effective throughput. We present FlashOffloading, a host-DRAM-centric inference architecture that fully offloads the KV cache in both the prefill and decode phases. FlashOffloading builds rolling HBM cache for prefill, a hot cache for decode, a reverse sparse index with zero extra miss-lookup overhead, and a compute--load overlapped kernel, optimizing KV offloading latency across the entire pipeline and delivering throughput gains under a time-per-output-token (TPOT) service-level objective (SLO). In experiments deploying GLM-5.2 with multi-token prediction (MTP3) speculative decoding on an Ascend910C prefill--decode (PD)-disaggregated platform, FlashOffloading improves prefill throughput by up to 1.38\(\times\) and decode throughput by up to 1.91\(\times\) under a 30 ms TPOT constraint. FlashOffloading is integrated into an open-source serving framework: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/tree/releases/v0.30.0.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

MoE-CORE: Coordinated Expert Offloading and Residency for Memory-Constrained MoE Inference

Sparse expert activation reduces MoE models' computation, yet expert weights can exceed limited device memory. Offloading makes inference feasible on a compact AI appliance but exposes host-to-device transfers to the inference path. We present MoE-CORE, a system that coordinates expert offloading and residency for memory-constrained MoE inference. It stages complete expert layers in alternating buffers during prefill. During decode, it combines nonuniform layer-wise cache capacity, domain-informed initialization, routing-history-aware replacement, and cross-layer prefetching. The main configuration executes router-selected experts exactly; an optional score-based substitution path handles eligible low-score misses. The main comparison uses 1K- and 128-token output caps for MoE-CORE and vLLM Prefetch, respectively. Across five workloads per model, MoE-CORE records a mean time per output token (TPOT) of 38.0-44.8 ms versus 1268.9-1269.1 ms for the evaluated vLLM Prefetch configuration on DeepSeek-V4-Flash-W4A8; the corresponding values on GLM-5.2-W4A8C8 are 206.6-220.5 and 5941.5-5941.8 ms. Under an 84-GB NPU-memory cap, the best measured DeepSeek GSM8K configuration achieves a TPOT of 21.5 ms with approximate expert substitution and multi-token prediction (MTP) at depth 2. These results support coordinated expert residency and transfer scheduling under a device-memory constraint. The code is here.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

VPP: Virtual Pipeline Parallelism for Efficient Chunked Prefill in Long-Context LLM Inference

Chunked prefill pipeline parallelism (CPP) is a key technique for LLM inference. However, equal-size chunks exhibit imbalanced latency, as later chunks attend longer prefix KV caches and incur higher attention costs, leading to pipeline bubbles. Existing approaches mitigate this imbalance through dynamic chunk resizing (Dynamic CPP, DCPP), but our measurements show that this trades scheduling overhead for load balancing, which becomes unfavorable on long sequences. In this study, we propose Virtual Pipeline Parallelism (VPP), which keeps chunk sizes fixed and optimizes the pipeline layout through virtual stages. A V-shaped virtual-stage traversal overlaps each chunk's expensive middle stages with the lighter head and tail stages of its neighbors, while asynchronous communication and pipelined packing further reduce communication stalls and cross-request drain bubbles. We implement VPP in vLLM-Ascend and evaluate it on three MoE-based LLMs with sequences up to 1M tokens on 16 Ascend 910C NPUs. VPP improves throughput by up to 13.1% over DCPP on long sequences and 6.7% on mixed workloads, while preserving performance on short sequences. On a 512K-token DeepSeek-V3.1 prefill workload, VPP reduces the pipeline bubble ratio from 6.4% to 0.1%, achieving a 98.0% reduction compared with DCPP.

cs.DC↗