arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xuchun Hu

Publications and source records attributed to Xuchun Hu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

HeteroReason: Heterogeneous FPGA-GPU Acceleration for Disaggregated Speculative Reasoning

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in reasoning tasks by utilizing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. To achieve fast execution speed, speculative reasoning techniques adopt a lightweight draft model for candidate token generation followed by process reward models (PRMs) for verification and a strong target model for refinements. This paper identifies that the existing speculative reasoning paradigm follows a strictly forward-only reasoning trajectory, which lacks robustness and can lead to severe error propagation if early reasoning steps are suboptimal. Furthermore, executing these disparate inference schemes, including sequential drafting and parallel verification on homogeneous GPU platforms, can lead to severe resource underutilization. To address this, we propose HeteroReason, an algorithm-hardware co-designed heterogeneous FPGA-GPU inference paradigm specifically tailored for LRM speculative reasoning. At the algorithmic level, we introduce a backtracking-enhanced workflow that enables the system to recover from low-quality states and explore alternative reasoning trajectories, significantly improving reasoning robustness. At the system level, the draft model is offloaded to the FPGA while deploying the PRM and target models on GPUs. A specialized workflow is optimized to achieve prefill-decode disaggregation, which exploits shadow synchronization to overlap GPU-side refinements with FPGA-side token updates to effectively hide synchronization latency. To mitigate inherent sequential constraints, we propose a step-ahead speculation and refinement scheduling scheme, transitioning the system from a sequential execution scheme to a parallel pipeline. Experimental evaluations show an average 4.2% accuracy improvement, with 1.01x-1.42x latency speedups and 1.25x-1.57x improvements in energy efficiency compared to homogeneous GPU baselines.

cs.AR↗

CREDO: Variance-Guided Rubric Evolution for Replay-Corrected Credit Assignment

Long-horizon language agents receive sparse terminal feedback, while intermediate rubrics provide structured but potentially misspecified assessments of progress. In resettable training environments, counterfactual continuation rollouts can measure local credit, but exhaustive replay is costly. We propose Credo, a framework that couples evolving semantic rubrics with selective, execution-based credit correction. A frozen judge maps visible transitions to rubric features, and a credit head predicts the change in expected terminal reward associated with the realized transition. Independently sampled two-sided replays correct prediction residuals using their recorded inclusion probabilities. We derive conditional unbiasedness and a variance decomposition that connects two design choices: which rubric features to retain, and where to allocate a fixed expected replay budget. The resulting criterion weights prediction errors by policy-score sensitivity and missing replay coverage; its allocation rule additionally accounts for continuation cost. We also describe a practical mixture with terminal leave-one-out advantages and distinguish its clipped, token-normalized PPO implementation from the ideal policy-gradient estimator. This preliminary report provides the method, proofs, an exact finite-model audit, and a controlled evaluation protocol. It makes no claim of empirical superiority on language-agent benchmarks.

cs.AI↗

MAD-OPD: Breaking the Ceiling in On-Policy Distillation via Multi-Agent Debate

On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own trajectories under token-level teacher supervision, but existing methods are capped by a single-teacher capability ceiling: when the teacher errs, the student inherits the error. OPD also remains largely unexplored in agentic tasks, where per-step errors compound across long trajectories and destabilize training. We propose MAD-OPD (Multi-Agent Debate-driven On-Policy Distillation), which breaks this ceiling by recasting the distillation teacher as a deliberative collective of teachers that debate over the student's on-policy state; the debate produces an emergent collective intelligence that supplies token-level supervision, with each teacher's contribution weighted by its post-debate confidence. To extend OPD to agentic tasks, we also introduce On-Policy Agentic Distillation (OPAD), which adds step-level sampling to stabilize training under multi-step error compounding. We additionally derive a task-adaptive divergence principle, selecting JSD (Jensen-Shannon divergence) for agentic stability and reverse KL (Kullback-Leibler) divergence for code generation, and verify it both theoretically and empirically. Across six teacher-student configurations (Qwen3 and Qwen3.5; 1.7B-14B students, 8B-32B teachers) and five agentic and code benchmarks, MAD-OPD ranks first across all six configurations; on the 14B+8B$\to$4B setting it lifts the agentic average by $+2.4\%$ and the code average by $+3.7\%$ over the stronger single-teacher OPD.

cs.CL↗