arXiv subjects

Xinying Cai

Publications and source records attributed to Xinying Cai.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

MUSE: Dependency-Aware Adaptation of a Frozen Vision Backbone for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting

Multivariate time-series forecasting is essential to many real-world applications. Recent large vision models (LVMs) offer a promising paradigm by transferring cross-domain visual priors to time-series forecasting. However, existing LVM-based methods face two key challenges: balancing independent visual representation spaces with cross-variable dependency modeling, and adapting vision backbones pretrained on natural images to the distinct temporal semantics of time-series images. To address these challenges, we propose MUSE, a dependency-aware adaptation framework built on a fully frozen pretrained MAE. First, the Variable Context Refinement Module (VCR) aggregates shared temporal information within each variable and models cross-variable contextual dependencies while preserving independent visual spaces. Second, the Temporal-Periodic Refinement Module (TPR) performs lightweight refinement at different encoder depths and explicitly models across-period temporal dependencies and within-period periodic dependencies. The two modules independently produce forecasts, which are fused through a learnable prediction-level gate. Experiments on 10 real-world datasets demonstrate that MUSE achieves state-of-the-art performance.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

WPBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Wind Power Forecasting

Accurate, reliable, and deployable wind power forecasting is critical for power system dispatch, renewable energy integration, and electricity market operations. Progress in this field hinges on the ability to empirically and comprehensively benchmark forecasting methods. Yet existing benchmarks fall short of supporting systematic evaluation in four key aspects: 1) limited coverage of wind power scenarios across turbine scale, variable composition, and spatial structure; 2) incomplete coverage of forecasting model families; 3) evaluation metrics misaligned with wind power requirements; and 4) limited structure-aware diagnostics beyond individual temporal patterns. To address these limitations, we propose WPBench, a comprehensive, fair, and extensible benchmark for wind power forecasting. WPBench integrates 26 public datasets organized by turbine scale and variable composition, spanning single-turbine, multi-turbine, univariate, and multivariate settings. Under unified processing, training, and evaluation protocols, it benchmarks 19 representative models covering traditional methods, deep temporal models, spatio-temporal models, and foundation models. Beyond point-wise errors, WPBench assesses forecast-curve fidelity and computational efficiency, and delivers structure-aware diagnostics across temporal, variable-dependency, and spatial-dependency perspectives. Together, these capabilities enable systematic model comparison across diverse wind scenarios and provide a reusable platform for future research.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

OpenPM: Auditable Point-in-Time Evaluation for LLM Portfolio-Management Agents

Large language models are increasingly used to read markets, assess risk, and allocate capital. However, reported results for LLM trading agents can be inflated by look-ahead leakage, optimistic execution, and risk mandates that are described but not enforced. We present OpenPM, an auditable point-in-time evaluation framework for LLM portfolio-management agents. In OpenPM, an agent manages a \$1M long-only book over the S\&P 500 universe using market data at five-minute intervals. Every record visible to the agent must be available at the decision time. Natural-language risk mandates are converted into typed constraints and enforced on the executed portfolio. Each run produces audit artifacts, including a contamination certificate, a cost-sensitivity curve, and a constraint-adherence report. We also build a reference agent named the tiered allocator, where typed analysts score candidates, a constructor LLM proposes weights, and a deterministic critic guarantees feasibility. We isolate constructor behavior by capturing analyst evidence once and replaying it across constructor models. In our short-window case study, stronger constructors show modest and model-dependent gains over equal weighting on the same pool, but analyst quality matters more than constructor choice, and turnover is the main cost driver. All returns are upper bounds on a single frozen window without market impact, not validated alpha.

cs.CE↗