arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xing Xie

Publications and source records attributed to Xing Xie.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Mitigating Spatial Blindness in Multiple Instance Learning for Whole-Slide Image Analysis

Whole-slide multiple instance learning can predict diagnostic and prognostic labels from tissue composition while making limited use of spatial organization. Providing coordinates or a graph does not establish that a trained predictor uses tissue neighborhoods. We examine this gap as spatial blindness and hypothesize that early composition learning can weaken supervision of a spatial pathway. We introduce ResTopoMIL, which freezes a learned composition predictor before training a graph residual with a coordinate-reassignment separation loss. Permutation and information analyses distinguish architectural symmetry, available spatial information and the proposed optimization mechanism. On a controlled spatial task, staged training achieved an AUC of 0.987, compared with 0.684 for the same jointly trained architecture. Performance remained high on a composition-only task. Across four WSI classification and five survival benchmarks, ResTopoMIL improved mean primary performance on eight tasks; four improvements remained significant after Holm-adjusted patient-cluster tests. Coordinate-free residual controls recovered some of the gains, while neighborhood destruction reduced performance close to the composition anchor. Neighborhood-preserving transformations and anatomy-stratified perturbations further characterized this dependence. These results support fixing a composition reference as a practical intervention for learning spatial corrections, while retaining additional appearance capacity as a contributing explanation.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Whose Values, Which Contexts, and What Signals? Grounding Cultural Value Alignment with Re3Culture

Cultural value alignment requires not only model optimization but also a well-specified target grounded in real-human evidence. Yet how such targets should be grounded in human data remains largely unexplored, raising three fundamental questions: (1) whose values should be represented? (2) where should cultural values be observed? and (3) what signals reveal underlying values? We investigate these questions through Re3Culture, a large-scale dataset linking (i) Representative communities: 700+ human participants across four cultures recruited through cultural-affiliation screening and demographic-aware sampling; (ii) Realistic scenario: culturally sensitive scenarios selected by community members, e.g., family and kinship; and (iii) Revealed value signals: 1,400+ value surveys, 20,000+ topic-grounded behavioral principles and explicit value priorities with responses for 6,000+ situated questions. Our analysis shows why these choices matter for defining the target, with three implications. First, estimating cultural values requires both community affiliation and broad internal coverage. Substituting other cultures or restricting subgroup coverage shifts value estimates. LLM simulations also disproportionately reflect particular subgroups. Second, values must be observed in concrete, community-guided situations. Abstract questionnaire profiles weakly recover situated priorities, and communities differ in which scenarios they identify as culturally value-revealing. Third, value priorities should be elicited explicitly, not learned from response preferences or bottom-line answers alone. Preferences conflate value agreement with other response-level qualities, and similar answers can be derived from different value priorities. By addressing these requirements, Re3Culture provides the first human-grounded resource that explicitly informs target definition for cultural value alignment.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Sage-A1.5: From Long-Horizon Execution to Scientific Exploration with Capability Composition

In this report, we introduce Sage-A1.5, a 35B Mixture-of-Experts agentic model that builds on A1 to advance long-horizon problem solving through adaptive capability composition. Compared with A1, Sage-A1.5 learns not only to solve individual tasks, but also to organize work and revise its approach during execution. Sage-A1.5 highlights three improvements: agentic orchestration, verification, and open scientific discovery. First, agentic orchestration extends single-agent execution through task delegation and parallel collaboration among subagents with isolated contexts, enabling complex tasks to be decomposed and addressed concurrently and supporting efficient execution while reducing interference across concurrent subagents. Second, agentic verification strengthens long-horizon reliability through progress checking, evidence validation, and reflective strategy revision, allowing the agent to recognize unproductive search paths and pursue alternative approaches. Third, open scientific discovery extends agentic capabilities beyond answering predefined questions to conducting exploratory research, connecting scientific inquiry with interactive analysis and inspectable research artifacts. We showcase these capabilities through complicated agentic tasks and multidisciplinary scientific applications. Besides, we hope Sage-A1.5 provides the community with an accessible foundation for open scientific discovery, offering a practical path from long-horizon task execution to collaborative, verifiable, and inspectable scientific exploration.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

AI Evaluation Should Require Standardized Item-Level Data Releases

This position paper argues that standardized item-level benchmark data should become the default infrastructure for AI evaluation. Current evaluations suffer from underspecified item selection, construct misalignment, and poor generalization; a disproportionate focus on aggregate model scores compounds these failures by keeping them undetected and unfixable. Without item-level evidence, validity claims cannot be assessed, resulting in inflated capability claims, misdirected research, and unwarranted trust in deployed systems. Our position is that valid evaluation requires empirical evidence from item-level benchmark data, including item content, test conditions, model responses, and item-level score statistics, and that the standardized release of such data should be treated as core AI evaluation infrastructure. Such releases also enable transparency, replicability, and auditability of evaluation results. To show that the norm is both feasible and consequential, we construct OpenEval, an item-level repository of 10.7M+ responses across 160K+ items from widely-used benchmarks, under a unified schema that the AI evaluation community can build upon. We demonstrate how item-level data can identify low-quality items, document construct misalignment, and recover validity evidence about benchmarks' internal structure. We address objections concerning contamination and coordination burden, and show that both are tractable relative to the costs of decisions made on inadequately validated evaluative claims.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Can Persona-Prompted LLMs Emulate Subgroup Values? An Empirical Analysis of Generalisability and Fairness in Cultural Alignment

Despite their global prevalence, many Large Language Models (LLMs) are aligned to a monolithic, often Western-centric set of values. This paper investigates the more challenging task of fine-grained value alignment: examining whether LLMs can emulate the distinct cultural values of demographic subgroups. Using Singapore as a case study and the World Values Survey (WVS), we examine the value landscape and show that even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4.1 achieve only 57.4% accuracy in predicting subgroup modal preferences. We construct a dataset of over 20,000 samples to train and evaluate a range of models. We demonstrate that simple fine-tuning on structured numerical preferences yields substantial gains, improving accuracy on unseen, out-of-distribution subgroups by an average of 17.4%. These gains partially transfer to open-ended generation. However, we find significant pre-existing performance biases, where models better emulate young, male, Chinese, and Christian personas. Furthermore, while fine-tuning improves average performance, it widens the disparity between subgroups when measured by distance-aware metrics. Our work offers insights into the limits and fairness implications of subgroup-level cultural alignment.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

EpiGuard: An Autonomous Infectious-Disease Early Warning Agent Platform

Infectious disease outbreaks often spread rapidly before signs of widespread transmission become apparent, leaving a big challenge for rapid response and effective intervention. However, current infectious-disease early-warning systems face three major challenges: fragmented epidemiological evidence across diverse surveillance sources, highly uneven data availability across diseases and geographic regions, and delayed warning procedure caused by manual data collection, analysis, and reporting. To address these challenges, we present EpiGuard, an autonomous, continually self-improving agentic platform for timely and reliable early warning of more than 50 infectious diseases across different regions. EpiGuard proactively monitors and captures newly released official surveillance records, using the latest available evidence for risk assessments. It dynamically adjusts its analytical strategy across three evidence availability regimes, enabling reliable risk assessment under diverse data conditions, ranging from the absence of historical observations to sparse and abundant evidence. Moreover, EpiGuard learns from the successful execution process by preserving effective data-acquisition and analytical procedures as reusable standard operating procedures, enabling it to progressively generalize to previously unseen diseases and regions. We use officially released infectious-disease surveillance data from the China CDC and the United States CDC to evaluate EpiGuard's effectiveness. Experimental results demonstrate that EpiGuard outperforms state-of-the-art forecasting systems, improving forecasting performance by 9.68% and 14.04% on the China CDC and U.S. CDC datasets, respectively.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

CultureConverse: A Multilingual Multi-turn Simulation Harness for Culturally Grounded Assistance in East and Southeast Asia

Current cultural evaluations for large language models (LLMs) often reduce culture to single-turn factual recall via MCQs, failing to capture a common use case: users seeking practical help over multiple turns in culturally grounded scenarios. We introduce CultureConverse, a scalable, multilingual simulation and evaluation harness for culturally grounded assistant dialogue that covers 10 East and Southeast Asian regions, 58 subgroup identities, and 7 domains. Each simulated and evaluated episode produces a scored interaction where the assistant assists the user and infers cultural constraints from partial information. The resulting CultureConverse-DS dataset contains 14,610 benchmark (evaluation) episodes and 274,295 oracle-guided (gold-mode) dialogues. In our benchmark evaluation of 18 models, GPT-5 mini achieves the highest assistance quality. Human annotation experiments suggest that our evaluation framework is a sufficient proxy for human judgment. Performance gains from fine-tuning on 27,860 high-quality CultureConverse-DS samples improve in-domain assistance and transfer out-of-domain to cultural MCQ and safety classification benchmarks. We release the harness, both splits, and judge prompts to support interactive evaluation of cultural competency.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

From Static Personal Values to Contextualized Personalization: Bayesian Personalized Value Alignment for LLMs

Personalized value alignment has become increasingly important as large language models (LLMs) are expected to accommodate diverse user preferences. However, existing methods typically align model outputs with a static value profile across prompts, overlooking that the salience of value dimensions varies substantially across contexts. Inspired by Lewin's Field Theory, which views human behavior as jointly shaped by personal dispositions and situational constraints, we model personal values as priors and context-dependent preferences as posteriors. We propose BaCVA, an inference-time Bayesian Context-aware personalized Value Alignment method that approximates posterior personalized preferences by integrating static personal values with scenario-specific value salience. BaCVA first estimates contextual value salience from generally normative responses, and then employs a dual-view personalization module to infer posterior preferences from complementary personal-value and scenario-driven perspectives. This Bayesian formulation enables more accurate and adaptive personalized value alignment while improving data efficiency via prior values. Extensive experiments on benchmarks demonstrate its superiority over strong baselines.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Controlling risks of AI in chemical science with agents

Artificial intelligence is rapidly advancing scientific discovery, but this progress carries risks of misuse, such as the creation of harmful substances, or circumvention of established regulations. In this paper, we first demonstrate the risks by highlighting real-world examples of AI misuse in chemical science, which underscore the need for effective safety alignment for these AI models. In response, we propose SciGuard, an agent-based guardrail that employs large language models, tools and external knowledge to assess and control risks in scientific AI interactions. For a fair comparison, we introduce a benchmark SciMT (Scientific Multi-Task) to assess both the safety and utility of different AI systems. SciGuard achieves a state-of-the-art harmlessness score on red-teaming queries, while maintaining high performance on benign tasks, without sacrificing scientific knowledge. Finally, we call for continued research and dialogue to ensure the safe deployment of AI in science.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation

With the growing prevalence of generative artificial intelligence (AI), an increasing amount of content is no longer exclusively generated by humans but by generative AI models with human guidance. This shift presents notable challenges for the delineation of originality due to the varying degrees of human contribution in AI-assisted works. This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation and introduces a framework to address this question that is grounded in information theory. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measure effectively discriminates between varying degrees of human contribution across multiple creative domains. We hope that this work lays a foundation for measuring human contributions in AI-assisted content generation in the era of generative AI.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

$A^2E$ : An End-to-End Agent Auditing Engine

With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), harnesses have become essential infrastructure for deploying agents across a wide range of domains. The fast-evolving harness ecosystem has also made rigorous capability evaluation increasingly important. However, efficiently building an end-to-end, systematic, and comprehensive evaluation pipeline remains a significant challenge. To address this challenge, we introduce $A^2E$ (Agent Auditing Engine), an end-to-end evaluation engine designed for agent harnesses. $A^2E$ leverages our newly proposed Agent Task Protocol (ATP) to enable the rapid integration of evaluation tasks with different harnesses. Through an automatically instrumented Monitor, it captures and generates standardized execution traces during experiments. In the Evaluation stage, $A^2E$ systematically assesses harness capabilities using a suite of multidimensional metrics. Compared with correctness alone, these metrics provide a more fine-grained characterization of differences among harnesses in execution efficiency, tool use, task planning, and error recovery. Experiments conducted with $A^2E$ further reveal that model-harness combinations exhibit substantial performance variation across different types of tasks, and that no single combination consistently outperforms all others across every task. These findings not only demonstrate the necessity of systematic evaluation but also provide useful guidance for the co-evolution of models and harnesses. Our code is available at https://github.com/datamllab/A2E.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Knowing Your Uncertainty -- On the application of LLM in social sciences

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into computational social science research, yet their blackboxed training and designed stochastic elements in inference pose unique challenges for scientific inquiry. This article argues that applying LLMs to social scientific tasks requires explicit assessment of uncertainty -- an expectation long established in both quantitative methodology in the social sciences and machine learning. We introduce a unified framework for evaluating LLM uncertainty based on Hill numbers, a family of diversity measures. By transforming existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) metrics into Hill numbers, the framework provides a common and intuitive scale for interpreting variation in LLM outputs while accommodating different notions of semantic similarity and different sensitivities to output distributions. We show how it might help the application of LLMs in social sciences through four empirical applications.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Discrete Diffusion Bridges for Spatiotemporally Aligned Image Translation and Generation

We propose Discrete Diffusion Bridges (DDB), a novel framework designed to resolve the fundamental spatiotemporal misalignment of standard discrete diffusion in image translation and generation. By corrupting data into a pure mask state via a random schedule, the conventional forward process induces a twofold misalignment: spatially, this pure-mask destination entirely discards the rich structural priors of the source image; temporally, the random masking order inherently contradicts the ``easy-first, hard-last'' decoding mechanism used during inference. To address this, DDB constructs a direct and efficient trajectory between domains. Spatially, we introduce a hybrid absorption mechanism that redefines the absorbing state to a stochastic mixture of mask and source tokens, effectively injecting source prior as spatial anchors into the latent space. Temporally, we design an information-guided noise schedule that quantifies semantic variation to prioritize the corruption of high-information regions at earlier timesteps. This ensures the model learns to resolve difficult semantic changes using robust context from invariant regions. Extensive experiments validate the versatility and robustness of our framework across diverse generative paradigms. DDB effectively balances edit alignment with structural fidelity across both text-guided semantic manipulation and pure structural image translation, while inherently complementing text-to-image generation and guaranteeing robust high-quality decoding under extremely low sampling steps. Code and models are available at \href{https://github.com/HKU-HealthAI/DDB}{https://github.com/HKU-HealthAI/DDB}.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Preference Data Selection for Mitigating the Alignment Tax in Large Language Models

Aligning large language models to human preferences is crucial for real-world deployment but frequently incurs an alignment tax, leading to the catastrophic forgetting of pre-trained general capabilities. While previous works primarily frame this problem as an optimization or architectural challenge, the inherent characteristics of preference data that drive this degradation remain largely underexplored. In this paper, we propose BALIGN, a balanced data selection strategy that explicitly mitigates catastrophic forgetting while optimizing alignment efficacy. Through theoretical and empirical analyses of the preference optimization gradient, we identify three key data-centric features that dictate parameter drift: the reference model's log-probability margin, the token length difference between chosen and rejected responses, and the TF-IDF similarity to general capability corpora. By aggregating these orthogonal features into a unified composite risk score, BALIGN systematically filters out high-risk preference samples that disrupt intrinsic model parameters or provide minimal alignment utility. Extensive experiments on standard human preference datasets demonstrate that BALIGN strongly preserves foundational capabilities without compromising alignment gains, consistently achieving the optimal Pareto frontier with minimal computational overhead.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Beyond BFI: The CSI for Enhanced Reliability and Validity in Evaluating LLM Personality Traits

As large language models (LLMs) increasingly function as human-like assistants exhibiting human-like personality traits, understanding their behavioral characteristics becomes essential for responsible AI development. However, existing evaluation efforts, which often adapt human psychological assessments such as the Big Five Inventory (BFI), face two significant limitations. First, these approaches often lack reliability, as minor prompt variations can lead to inconsistent test results. Second, the theoretical foundations of these tools, rooted in human studies, are misaligned with the computational nature of LLMs, thereby limiting their validity in predicting real-world model behavior. To address these limitations, we introduce the Core Sentiment Inventory (CSI), a novel personality trait evaluation instrument designed from the ground up and specifically tailored to the unique characteristics of LLMs. CSI covers both English and Chinese, that implicitly evaluates models' personality traits, providing insightful psychological portraits of LLMs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that: (1) CSI effectively captures nuanced behavioral patterns, revealing significant behavioral variations in LLMs across different languages and contexts; (2) Compared to current evaluation tools, CSI significantly improves reliability, yielding more consistent and robust results; and (3) The correlation between CSI scores and LLMs' real-world outputs exceeds 0.85, demonstrating its strong validity in predicting LLM behavior.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

AI-AI co-creation outperforms human pairs in creative tasks

Prior research often finds that AI creativity is limited: single systems rarely outperform humans, and human-AI collaboration does not exceed human output. We argue these conclusions underestimate AI's potential because most studies do not allow iterative, multi-agent exchanges that mirror the social processes underpinning human creativity. We conducted an experiment comparing four conditions: (i) AI-AI co-creation with complementary generator-evaluator roles, (ii) AI-AI co-creation with identical roles, (iii) single-AI creation, and (iv) human-human co-creation. Across three open-ended tasks, 1,212 ideas were rated by trained judges on creativity, novelty, and usefulness. Both AI-AI co-creation conditions consistently outperformed single-AI creation and human pairs on creativity and novelty. Usefulness varied by task: complementary roles yielded the most useful solutions in the broadest and most socially complex task, suggesting role differentiation is advantageous when problems require both imaginative ideation and practical refinement. Human pairs performed worst, consistent with production losses in group creativity. These findings indicate that structured, iterative multi-agent AI co-creation can exceed single-AI and human-human ideation.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Informal Learning Emerges in Everyday Human-LLM Interaction

As LLMs become increasingly capable of completing tasks for users, a central concern is that everyday AI use may become primarily cognitive offloading, eroding the opportunities through which people develop their own capabilities. We analyse large-scale human-LLM conversations to ask whether informal learning behaviors also emerge in this setting: whether users engage in exchanges in ways that preserve opportunities to learn. Across 128,569 naturalistic conversations, we translated learning-science constructs into turn-level behavioural signatures. Cognitive engagement, users' cognitive effort as reflected in the exchange, appeared in 31.9% of 491,685 user turns, whereas constructive engagement, the deepest observable form of learning-oriented engagement, appeared in 4.9%, showing that deeper sense-making was recurrent but selective. Our study further identifies factors associated with these forms of engagement. Scaffolded assistant support consistently marked richer constructive participation, with associations varying by user framing, task ecology, support form, timing and prior user state. Together, these findings show that everyday human-LLM interaction is not only answer delivery or cognitive offloading; it also contains measurable, selective and conditionally organized behavioural signatures of informal learning. They shift AI evaluation from answer-delivery efficiency toward the preservation of cognitive opportunities for users to reason, test ideas and construct understanding in the course of everyday problem-solving.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Learning behavior accounts for background-related advantage in AI-assisted education

Generative AI has been found, and will likely be found increasingly, useful in education. However, existing AI-for-education studies provide inconsistent evidence on its average effects. More broadly, research on prior educational technologies shows that average effects often mask substantial heterogeneity across student populations. Motivated by this evidence, this study examines heterogeneity in students' learning behavior with AI, which students benefit from AI assistance, and how learner profiles and learning behavior shape these patterns. To this end, we recruited 318 university students to participate in structured learning experiments lasting up to 125 minutes. Our findings indicate that students' learning behavior is strongly associated with learning outcomes, with behaviors characterized by proactive and critical engagement, rather than limited engagement, associated with significantly better performance. These behavioral differences are related to learner profiles, with students from higher-ranking universities and those with greater prior knowledge tending to benefit more, consistent with their greater likelihood of adopting proactive interaction strategies. Accounting for learning behavior substantially weakens or eliminates the associations between learner profiles and learning outcomes, suggesting that how students use AI is a key pathway through which background differences are linked to learning gains. Overall, this work provides a deeper understanding of AI assistance in education by showing how differences in learner profiles and learning behavior shape who benefits from AI-supported learning. These insights can help educators and students better navigate and integrate AI into educational practices.

cs.HC↗