arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xinchen Xiao

Publications and source records attributed to Xinchen Xiao.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

UO-FIE: Combining Exact-Label Supervision with Graded Utility for Factivity Inference

The Factivity Inference Evaluation 2026 (FIE2026) classifies Chinese context-hypothesis pairs into nine ordered factivity intervals. Its evaluation metric rewards both exact predictions and proximity to the correct interval, while 64.1% of the 566 training examples belong to a single class. In preliminary experiments, several mDeBERTa classification models predominantly predict the dominant class, whereas a Huber-regression baseline produces more predictions near the correct interval but fewer exact matches. We introduce Utility-Oriented Factivity Inference (UO-FIE), a parameter-efficient system that combines exact-label supervision with graded utility. UO-FIE predicts a distribution over the nine classes and combines hard-label supervision, utility-based soft targets, scheduled class weights, and an ordinal loss. We evaluate expected-utility decoding in controlled comparisons and use ordinal calibration selected on out-of-fold predictions for the submitted system. Based on Qwen3.5-9B with LoRA, UO-FIE ranks first in the fine-tuning track with a macro utility of 0.8316. A separate prompt-based ensemble ranks third in the non-fine-tuning track with a macro utility of 0.8450.

cs.LG↗

Route-Verify-Vote: Procedure-Conditioned Self-Consistency for Mixed-Domain Reasoning

Compositional generalization remains challenging when language models must combine familiar reasoning operations in unfamiliar ways. The Scenario-Based Commonsense Reasoning Evaluation (SCoRE) 2026 tests this ability on three mixed domains absent from training and requires models to identify the complete set of correct options for each question. We introduce Route-Verify-Vote (RVV), a framework for procedure-conditioned self-consistency that uses language models without parameter updates. Route uses the provided domain label to select a reasoning procedure that guides the model in representing and applying the relevant constraints. Verify prompts the model to assess each option against those constraints. Vote aggregates complete answer sets and allocates additional samples to questions with a small vote-count margin between the two most frequent sets. Samples for each question follow the same domain-specific procedure. On the official test set, voting over 16 sampled answer sets per question achieves an exact-set accuracy of 74.6%. Adaptive RVV reaches 77.3%, and combining models on selected domain routes raises accuracy to 79.4%. The final system ranked second among participating systems. These results support domain-specific reasoning procedures and answer-set disagreement as useful tools for allocating inference-time computation in mixed-domain reasoning.

cs.AI↗