arXiv subjects

Xiaoyun Qiu

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaoyun Qiu.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

PLAN-S: Bridging Planning with Latent Style Dynamics for Autonomous Driving World Models

Latent world models (LWMs) have strengthened end-to-end autonomous driving by forecasting compact scene dynamics for downstream planning. However, existing LWM-based planners usually generate trajectories directly from entangled latent representations. This compact latent-to-planner pathway lacks explicit modeling of risk, drivability, and diverse style preferences, making driving-style dynamics difficult to supervise, inspect, or modulate before a final trajectory is selected. We propose PLAN-S (PLANning with latent Style dynamics), a planner-facing bridge that addresses this compactness-controllability dilemma by decoding a style-conditioned, four-channel semantic cost map from the latent representation. The cost map is conditioned on ego state and driving style and is consumed up-stream of the planning decision through two host-side interfaces: attention-level fusion for regression planners and reward-level fusion for anchor-score planners. We validate PLAN-S on two architecturally distinct hosts, ResWorld on nuScenes and WoTE on NAVSIM, while keeping the host backbones frozen to isolate the contribution of the proposed bridge. On nuScenes, PLAN-S reduces L2 at every horizon over the baseline, with 0.55 m average L2 and a 42% relative reduction in the 3 s collision rate. On NAVSIM, the rule-cost variant reaches 89.4 Predictive Driver Model Score (PDMS), while the learned cost variant provides complementary gains on baseline-challenging scenes. Ablations show that the cost pathway contributes most directly to safer trajectory selection. Qualitative results further show that PLAN-S can produce diverse cost maps, with spatially consistent variations aligned to different driving styles.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Does Visual Information Play a Decisive Role in Vision-Language-Action Model Driving Behavior?

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated promising capability in autonomous driving, highlighting the potential of unified multimodal architectures for jointly modeling perception and planning. However, how current VLA-based driving behavior is grounded in visual information remains poorly understood. Existing evaluation protocols mainly focus on aggregate performance metrics, lacking structured and practical diagnostics to quantify visual-behavior dependency. In this work, we introduce a structured multi-level visual perturbation framework to analyze visual-behavior dependency in VLA-based driving models systematically. The framework organizes controlled visual perturbations along three complementary dimensions: channellevel degradation, information-level disruption, and structurelevel modification. We apply it to VLA-based driving systems and evaluate behavioral responses under both open-loop trajectory prediction and interactive closed-loop safety evaluation. Experimental results reveal evaluation-dependent dependency patterns and uneven visual grounding across abstraction levels. These findings call for more structured analyses and principled design of VLA driving models to better understand how visual information shapes behavior and develop safer, more robust systems.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Performance Manipulation: Labor Market Implications in AI-assisted Era

Performance manipulation arises when agents exploit easily measurable, routine tasks to inflate observable outcomes without contributing genuine innovation or expert judgment. We formalize this phenomenon in a game-theoretic model in which agents allocate effort along two margins. Creative effort is non-routine cognitive labor whose return is complementary to the agent's private expertise; it is the scarce input that principals seek. Mechanistic effort is the execution of well-defined, rule-based tasks that raise performance independently of expertise, a commoditized input that AI heavily augments. We establish the existence of a symmetric, monotone pure-strategy equilibrium and show that performance-based screening remains viable so long as evaluations retain a sufficient creative component, but collapses into an uninformative pooling equilibrium once AI capability grows large enough to crowd out creative effort. Comparing contest allocations against a single-agent baseline isolates performance manipulation as the competition-induced over-investment in mechanistic effort, which we show is undertaken systematically by low-type agents but not high-type ones. We further prove that more sharply skewed reward structures mitigate this friction by eliciting greater creative effort across the participant pool. Finally, using a novel, language-model-based methodology to measure both effort types from nearly 1,500 Kaggle competition scripts, we provide robust empirical support for the model's predictions.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Allocating Resources under Strategic Misrepresentation

We study how to allocate resources to participants who can strategically misrepresent their deservingness at a cost. A principal assigns item(s) (or money) among multiple agents on the basis of their costly signals. Each agent's signal reflects their private type in the absence of misrepresentation but can be inflated above their true type at a cost. The principal is a social planner who aims to maximize the weighted average of matching efficiency and a utilitarian objective. Strategic misrepresentation introduces novel incentive-compatibility constraints, under which we characterize the optimal mechanism. We apply our characterization to two kinds of markets, distinguished by resource scarcity, and show that the principal strictly benefits from randomizing the allocations based on costly signals when the population of participants is large enough. Interestingly, in large markets with scarce resources, the format of the optimal mechanism converges to a winner-takes-all contest; however, there is a non-diminishing value in randomizing allocations to middle types as the population of participants grows.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2025

Work Zones challenge VLM Trajectory Planning: Toward Mitigation and Robust Autonomous Driving

Visual Language Models (VLMs), with powerful multimodal reasoning capabilities, are gradually integrated into autonomous driving by several automobile manufacturers to enhance planning capability in challenging environments. However, the trajectory planning capability of VLMs in work zones, which often include irregular layouts, temporary traffic control, and dynamically changing geometric structures, is still unexplored. To bridge this gap, we conduct the \textit{first} systematic study of VLMs for work zone trajectory planning, revealing that mainstream VLMs fail to generate correct trajectories in $68.0%$ of cases. To better understand these failures, we first identify candidate patterns via subgraph mining and clustering analysis, and then confirm the validity of $8$ common failure patterns through human verification. Building on these findings, we propose REACT-Drive, a trajectory planning framework that integrates VLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Specifically, REACT-Drive leverages VLMs to convert prior failure cases into constraint rules and executable trajectory planning code, while RAG retrieves similar patterns in new scenarios to guide trajectory generation. Experimental results on the ROADWork dataset show that REACT-Drive yields a reduction of around $3\times$ in average displacement error relative to VLM baselines under evaluation with Qwen2.5-VL. In addition, REACT-Drive yields the lowest inference time ($0.58$s) compared with other methods such as fine-tuning ($17.90$s). We further conduct experiments using a real vehicle in 15 work zone scenarios in the physical world, demonstrating the strong practicality of REACT-Drive.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

An Intention-driven Lane Change Framework Considering Heterogeneous Dynamic Cooperation in Mixed-traffic Environment

In mixed-traffic environments, autonomous vehicles (AVs) must interact with heterogeneous human-driven vehicles (HVs) whose intentions and driving styles vary across individuals and scenarios. Such variability introduces uncertainty into lane change interactions, where safety and efficiency critically depend on accurately anticipating surrounding drivers' cooperative responses. Existing methods often oversimplify these interactions by assuming uniform or fixed behavioral patterns. To address this limitation, we propose an intention-driven lane change framework that integrates driving-style recognition with cooperation-aware decision-making and motion-planning. A deep learning-based classifier identifies distinct human driving styles in real time. We then introduce a dual-perspective cooperation score composed of intrinsic style-dependent tendencies and interactive dynamic components, enabling interpretable and adaptive intention prediction and quantitative inference. A decision-making module combines behavior cloning (BC) and inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to determine lane change feasibility. Later, a coordinated motion-planning architecture integrating IRL-based intention inference with model predictive control (MPC) is established to generate collision-free and socially compliant trajectories. Experiments on the NGSIM dataset show that the proposed decision-making model outperforms representative rule-based and learning-based baselines, achieving 96.98% accuracy in lane change classification. Motion-planning evaluations further demonstrate improved maneuver success and execution stability in mixed-traffic environments. These results validate the effectiveness of structured cooperation modeling for intention-driven autonomous lane changes.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Multi-dimensional Test Design

How should one jointly design tests and the arrangement of agencies to administer these tests (testing procedure)? To answer this question, we analyze a model where a principal must use multiple tests to screen an agent with a multi-dimensional type, knowing that the agent can change his type at a cost. We identify a new tradeoff between setting difficult tests and using a difficult testing procedure. We compare two settings: (1) the agent only misrepresents his type (manipulation) and (2) the agent improves his actual type (investment). Examples include interviews, regulations, and data classification. We show that in the manipulation setting, stringent tests combined with an easy procedure, i.e., offering tests sequentially in a fixed order, is optimal. In contrast, in the investment setting, non-stringent tests with a difficult procedure, i.e., offering tests simultaneously, is optimal; however, under mild conditions offering them sequentially in a random order may be as good. Our results suggest that whether the agent manipulates or invests in his type determines which arrangement of agencies is optimal.

econ.TH↗

arXiv2024

The Complexity of Tullock Contests

Despite the extensive literature on Tullock contests, computational results for the general model with heterogeneous contestants remain scarce. This paper studies the algorithmic complexity of computing a pure Nash Equilibrium (PNE) in such general Tullock contests. We find that the elasticity parameters {r_i}, which govern the returns to scale of contestants' production functions, play a decisive role in the problem's complexity. Our core conceptual insight is that the computational hardness is determined specifically by the number of contestants with medium elasticity (r_i \in (1, 2]). This is illustrated by a complete set of algorithmic results under two parameter regimes: -Efficient Regime: When the number of contestants with medium elasticity is logarithmically bounded by the total number of contestants (O(log n)), we provide an algorithm that determines the existence of a PNE and computes an epsilon-PNE in polynomial time in both n and log(1/epsilon) (i.e., Poly(n,log(1/epsilon))) whenever it exists. This result generalizes classical findings for concave (r_i <= 1) and convex (r_i > 2) cases, establishing computational tractability for a broader class of mixed-elasticity contests. -Hard Regime: In contrast, we show when the number of medium elasticity contestants exceed Omega(log n), determining the existence of PNEs is NP-complete and it is impossible for any algorithm to compute an epsilon-PNE within running time Poly(n,log(1/epsilon)). We then design a Fully Polynomial-Time Approximation Scheme (FPTAS) that computes an epsilon-PNE in Poly(n,1/epsilon), guaranteeing efficient approximations for hard instances.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Mechanism Design under Costly Signaling: the Value of Non-Coordination

We study allocation mechanisms that utilize costly signaling as a screening tool. A social planner aims to maximize social welfare, defined as the weighted sum of agents' utilities, while implementing a specific allocation rule. Within a broad class of agent preferences, we show that coordination mechanisms (where recommended signals depend on joint reports) can be outperformed by non-coordination mechanisms (where signals depend solely on individual reports). We formalize the conditions under which the optimal mechanism features no coordination and demonstrate that such mechanisms are implementable through coarse-ranking contests.

econ.TH↗