arXiv subjects

Xiaotong Tan

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaotong Tan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Preoperative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Integrating Multimodal Ultrasound and Clinical Data: A Multicenter Study

Background: Microvascular invasion (MVI) predicts recurrence and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but requires postoperative histopathology for diagnosis. We developed and validated a model integrating multimodal ultrasound and clinical data for preoperative MVI prediction. Methods: This multicenter study included 489 patients with HCC from eight centers. All patients had B-mode ultrasound (BUS), color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US), and clinical information. Data from seven centers (n = 421) were used for model development with five-fold cross-validation; data from the remaining center (n = 68) formed an independent external validation cohort. The proposed multimodal information fusion network used modality-specific encoders, a hemodynamic temporal change module for bidirectional DCE-US perfusion changes, and a representation consistency learning module to align heterogeneous ultrasound representations before Transformer-based fusion. Results: In external validation, DCE-US achieved the highest single-modality area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 0.8545+/-0.0198), versus clinical information (0.6715+/-0.0156), CDFI (0.6435+/-0.0344), and BUS (0.6087+/-0.0417). Pixel-difference sampling and the proposed temporal module outperformed alternative sampling and video representation methods. The full model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.8953+/-0.0180, accuracy of 81.18%+/-2.83%, sensitivity of 86.40%+/-6.69%, and specificity of 78.14%+/-6.28. Conclusions: Integrating multimodal ultrasound and clinical information enabled promising preoperative MVI prediction in HCC. DCE-US was the main source of predictive information, while BUS, CDFI, and clinical information provided complementary value. The proposed framework may support preoperative risk stratification and individualized clinical decision-making.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Improving O-RADS Risk Stratification from Ultrasound Reports: A Comparative Evaluation of Hybrid versus End-to-End LLM Reasoning Strategies

Background: Automating clinical guideline-based decision-making with large language models (LLMs) remains challenging because of reliability, hallucination, and limited interpretability. We compared the performance of LLMs and reasoning strategies for automated Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) classification from free-text pelvic ultrasound reports. Methods: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with ovarian masses who underwent pelvic ultrasound were included. Eight LLMs were tested with three reasoning strategies: implicit-knowledge end-to-end, rule-informed end-to-end, and a feature-based hybrid architecture that decoupled feature extraction from rule-based classification. The reference standard was O-RADS categorization established by expert consensus. Results: A total of 310 women with 390 ovarian masses were evaluated. The feature-based hybrid architecture using Gemini 3.6 Flash demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 99.2% (387 of 390) and almost perfect agreement with the reference standard (weighted kappa = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99-1.00). Its performance surpassed that of original clinical reports (accuracy, 87.7% [342 of 390]; weighted kappa = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.96) and end-to-end LLM strategies (accuracy range, 65.6% [256 of 390] to 95.9% [374 of 390]). For structured feature extraction, Gemini 3.6 Flash demonstrated higher overall accuracy than Claude Fable 5 (98.9% vs 97.8%; P < 0.001). The hybrid architecture reduced misclassification errors and mitigated the overstaging tendency observed in original reports. Conclusion: The feature-based hybrid LLM architecture that separates clinical feature extraction from deterministic guideline execution enables highly accurate, reliable, and interpretable automated O-RADS classification, providing a promising approach for standardized, guideline-based clinical decision-making.

cs.AI↗