arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xiaojun Song

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaojun Song.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Neyman Orthogonalized Specification Tests for Conditional Tail Index Models

We develop specification tests for parametric conditional tail index models of heavy-tailed distributions. The tests are based on a projected empirical process that removes the first-order effect of estimating the null parameter. Within the conditional Hall class, we identify conditions under which projection also eliminates the leading Pareto approximation bias in the test process, permitting lower thresholds while preserving asymptotically correct size. We establish the validity of the tests via multiplier bootstrap. For log-linear models, bootstrap validity extends to settings in which covariates among observations above a common threshold concentrate and the smallest eigenvalue of the information matrix tends to zero. We further propose a data-driven threshold selection rule based on an estimate of the Pareto approximation bias after projection. The rule allows lower thresholds to retain more observations for testing while limiting size distortions, with potential gains in power. The finite sample performance of the tests is examined through simulations and a real data application.

math.ST↗

Testing Exogeneity in Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Models

We propose a test of mean exogeneity in nonparametric instrumental variable models. Under completeness, the null is equivalent to a conditional moment restriction involving the ordinary regression function, so the test avoids estimation of the structural function and its ill-posed inverse problem. We construct a residual-marked empirical process and analyze it through an auxiliary U-process of order two. We derive its limiting distributions under the null and Pitman-type local alternatives of order $n^{-1/2}$, and establish consistency against fixed global alternatives. The analysis reveals a nonparametric estimation effect that invalidates a direct multiplier bootstrap. We propose a computationally simple multiplier bootstrap with a tailor-made indicator correction to account for this effect, and establish its asymptotic validity. Simulations show good size control and power gains over existing methods in the nonparametric designs considered. An application to a wage equation provides evidence against the mean exogeneity of schooling.

econ.EM↗

Uniform Inference for Parameters Identified by Conditional Quantile Restrictions

Many structural and dynamic economic models imply that key parameters are identified by conditional quantile restrictions. Building on the exponential-weighting approach of Bierens (1990) and penalized maximum statistics for conditional moment restrictions developed by Chen et al. (2025), we develop a framework for uniform inference on such parameters. We transform the conditional restriction into a continuum of unconditional moment conditions and construct an adaptive $\ell_1$-penalized supremum statistic that aggregates evidence across quantile indices. The penalty regularizes maximization over the weighting direction. Under the stated conditions, adaptive penalty selection asymptotically preserves or improves worst-case local power relative to the unpenalized test over a prespecified set of alternatives. The improvement is strict whenever a positive candidate penalty raises the population maximin criterion above its value at zero. We extend the theory to settings with pre-estimated nuisance parameters, characterizing the additional terms induced by the plug-in step in the limiting process. We derive an analytically corrected variance estimator that accounts for this estimation uncertainty and establish the validity of a Gaussian multiplier bootstrap for null inference and its shifted counterpart for analysis of local power. Monte Carlo comparisons favor CvM-KS for size control under pre-estimation and show that adaptive penalization can improve empirical power relative to the unpenalized test.

econ.EM↗

Testing for Essential Heterogeneity in the Marginal Treatment Effects Model

We propose a test for essential heterogeneity in the marginal treatment effects model without imposing additive separability. On the observed support of the propensity score, no essential heterogeneity implies that the conditional mean of the outcome is affine in the propensity score, and this affine restriction is the sharp testable implication of the null. We implement the test using a projected Gaussian-process statistic that is Neyman-orthogonal to the first-step estimation error, so the multiplier bootstrap avoids re-estimating nuisance parameters. Monte Carlo experiments show accurate size control and good power, and, unlike the fixed-scale integrated conditional moment benchmark, the data-driven median rule retains power as the conditioning set grows in dimension. In an application to the Ugandan ELA programme, the omnibus statistic rejects the null of no essential heterogeneity for aspirations at the midline follow-up.

econ.EM↗

A multiplier bootstrap score test for Tobit specification

In this paper, we propose a simple score-based specification test for the Tobit regression model, implemented through a computationally efficient multiplier bootstrap. We test correct specification through the conditional moment restriction that the generalized Tobit residual has zero conditional mean, and construct a feasible score-based empirical process using the integrated conditional moments approach, conditioning on the estimated index so that no smoothing or tuning parameter is required. We derive a first-order uniform representation of the feasible process, showing how its limiting behavior is affected by maximum-likelihood estimation of the structural parameter, and obtain the asymptotic properties of the corresponding Kolmogorov--Smirnov statistic under the null, fixed alternatives, and a sequence of local alternatives. Since the limiting null distribution is non-pivotal, $p$-values are obtained from a multiplier bootstrap that mimics the first-order representation and therefore captures the parameter estimation uncertainty. Monte Carlo experiments, including an unknown-scale design, an index-visible/index-invisible power study, and comparisons with existing specification tests, confirm accurate size and competitive power across a range of designs and covariate dimensions. Two empirical applications further demonstrate the practical utility of our approach.

econ.EM↗

Tuning-Free Tests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity via Expectile Processes

This paper develops tuning-free tests for treatment-effect heterogeneity. By characterizing the null hypothesis as constancy of the expectile treatment-effect curve, we construct test statistics as continuous functionals of the mean-centered sample expectile process. We establish a uniform Bahadur representation, derive the asymptotic properties of the test statistics under the null and fixed alternatives, and show nontrivial power against local alternatives approaching the null at the $n^{-1/2}$ rate. For feasible inference, we develop a fast multiplier bootstrap that consistently approximates the nonpivotal null distribution while capturing the first-order effect of estimating the unknown common shift. The procedure is tuning-free, requiring no density or score-function estimation, bandwidth selection, or repeated refitting. The framework further incorporates a pointwise-studentized refinement and a covariate adjustment that reduces asymptotic variation without altering the population discrepancy. Monte Carlo comparisons with existing methods show generally reliable size control, competitive power, and substantial computational savings. An application to a large-scale water-conservation experiment illustrates the proposed tests.

econ.EM↗

Testing Treatment Effect Heterogeneity with Functional Outcomes

Assessing treatment-effect heterogeneity is important in causal inference, particularly for functional outcomes where effects may vary over time and the common effect is unknown. We propose a nonparametric procedure that assesses treatment-effect homogeneity through a testable marginal implication. By comparing within-arm difference distributions, the construction removes the unknown common functional effect without estimating it. We measure departures between these distributions through an integrated squared discrepancy of their characteristic functionals. A full-support Gaussian integrating measure yields an explicit bounded-kernel representation and identifies equality of the difference laws without requiring moment conditions on the outcomes. We construct an unbiased generalized U-statistic that accounts for dependence among overlapping differences, derive its null, fixed-alternative, and local-alternative limits, and develop a centered multiplier bootstrap for inference. The framework extends to multiple treatment arms with a shared control. For computation, a random-direction approximation combined with a nine-state recursion reduces the cost to linear order in the sample size for fixed numerical settings. Simulation studies assess the finite-sample performance of the proposed procedure relative to several benchmark methods. An application to the Irish gas smart-metering trial illustrates its use for assessing heterogeneity in functional treatment responses.

stat.ME↗

Detecting Copula Structural Changes: A Smooth Testing Approach

This paper develops novel smooth tests for structural changes in the innovation copula of multivariate dynamic models. We characterize deviations from copula constancy through a collection of generalized Fourier coefficients and test their joint significance. Under the null hypothesis, estimation of the dynamic parameters and the unknown marginals has no first-order estimation effect on the proposed statistics. Consequently, the feasible tests based on estimated residuals are asymptotically equivalent to their infeasible counterparts based on the unobserved innovations, yielding a desirable oracle property. Our proposed tests are asymptotically $χ^2$-distributed and possess nontrivial power against local alternatives that approach the null at the parametric rate. To enhance the practicability of our methods, we further develop a data-driven procedure that automatically selects the truncation orders of the basis expansions. Unlike existing methods based on empirical copula processes or kernel smoothing, our tests require neither computationally intensive bootstrap procedures nor bandwidth selection. Extensive simulations demonstrate the satisfactory empirical size and power of our proposed tests. In particular, the data-driven test delivers substantial power gains under sparse alternatives, while remaining competitive under dense alternatives. Applications to exchange rates and stock returns further illustrate the practical usefulness of the proposed methods.

econ.EM↗

Robust Inference for Dyadic Data with Spatially Dependent Nodes

We develop inference for complete dyadic samples with spatial dependence governed by geographic distances between nodes, covering settings beyond the scope of existing dyadic inference theory. We propose spatial variance and corrected block jackknife estimators consistent in nondegenerate and degenerate Gaussian cases. Under degeneracy, spatial subsampling consistently estimates possibly non-Gaussian limits. Combining the jackknife with subsampling yields the max jackknifes-ubsampling (MJS) interval, which provides pointwise asymptotically exact coverage in both Gaussian cases and conservative coverage in the specified non-Gaussian case. Fixed-effect extensions show that estimating node effects can change the fast limiting distribution. Simulations and an empirical illustration are provided.

econ.EM↗

Testing for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Regression Discontinuity Designs

We propose a nonparametric test for unobserved treatment effect heterogeneity in regression discontinuity designs. Under the null of no unobserved heterogeneity, a transformed outcome that imputes treated potential outcomes for untreated units must have a continuous conditional distribution at the cutoff. We convert this implication into an integrated conditional-moment restriction using characteristic functions, thereby allowing the conditional local average treatment effect to be an unrestricted function of covariates. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the test statistics via a $U$-process and establish the validity of a multiplier bootstrap procedure for calculating critical values. Monte Carlo experiments show well-controlled size and increasing power. Two empirical applications illustrate how the test distinguishes between heterogeneity explained by observables and that explained by unobserved factors.

econ.EM↗

Testing Conditional Stochastic Dominance via Copula Derivatives

Comparing two populations at the same physical covariate value requires more than conditional means or isolated target-point decisions: researchers may need evidence about an entire conditional-distribution ordering over a continuum, even when covariate margins differ. This paper makes that common-value comparison estimable under an explicit structure--flexibility tradeoff and turns the resulting surface into simultaneous evidence for first-order stochastic dominance. Population-specific margins map the common covariate value into each group, while a fitted copula-derivative representation links conditional distributions across the region. Uniform inference propagates uncertainty from both the margins and dependence model through a one-sided statistic with unknown binding locations. Under correct specification within a finite copula class, smoothness and trimming conditions, and a uniquely best candidate family, the procedure admits uniform control and consistent calibration. Simulations show increasing rejection as alternatives become more distinguishable, alongside model-selection sensitivity and small-sample size distortion. In a descriptive PSID application, the high--low parental-education comparison satisfies the two-direction criterion after multiplicity adjustment, whereas adjacent education-group comparisons remain inconclusive. The framework therefore supports region-wide distributional comparison while making its structural and inferential boundaries explicit.

stat.ME↗

Asymmetric Huber Periodogram

This paper introduces a novel spectral M-estimator, called the asymmetric Huber periodogram (AHP), as a generalization of the ordinary periodogram (PG), the quantile periodogram (QP), and the Huber periodogram (HP). The AHP is constructed via trigonometric asymmetric Huber regression (AHR), in which a specially designed loss function replaces the squared $\ell_2$ loss used to define the PG. Relative to the QP, the AHP can be more computationally efficient, and relative to the HP and PG, it provides a more comprehensive characterization by examining the data across the range of the asymmetry parameter. We establish the theoretical properties of the AHP and investigate its relationship with the corresponding asymmetric Huber spectrum (AHS). Building on the asymptotic theory, we develop confidence intervals (CIs) for the AHS and propose a Fisher-type test. Simulation studies and two applications further demonstrate the AHP's effectiveness in detecting hidden periodicities, robustness to outliers, and utility for time series clustering.

stat.ME↗

Specification Testing for Dyadic Regression Models

This paper develops omnibus specification tests for linear conditional-mean models with undirected dyadic data. We establish a uniform projection theorem that reduces the dyadic process to its latent first-order node projections under shared-node dependence. We then show that a raw first-order node-multiplier bootstrap is valid when this node component is nondegenerate but double-counts dyad-specific variation when dyads are independent. An exact covariance decomposition motivates a corrected Gaussian bootstrap that is valid in both regimes. The resulting Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises tests are consistent against fixed alternatives and have nontrivial power against rate-appropriate local alternatives. Simulations show that the corrected Kolmogorov-Smirnov test provides the most stable size control while retaining substantial local power. An application to the Lazega law-firm network rejects additive linear and quadratic specifications but finds no remaining misspecification after including an economically relevant interaction.

econ.EM↗

Unified Inference on Moment Restrictions with Nuisance Parameters

This paper proposes a simple unified inference approach on moment restrictions in the presence of nuisance parameters. The proposed test is constructed based on a new characterization that avoids the estimation of nuisance parameters and can be broadly applied across diverse settings. Under suitable conditions, the test is shown to be asymptotically size controlled and consistent for both independent and dependent samples. Monte Carlo simulations show that the test performs well in finite samples. Numerical results from the application to conditional moment restriction models with weak instruments demonstrate that the proposed method may improve upon existing approaches in the literature.

stat.ME↗

Kernel Minimum Distance Estimation and Testing with Conditional Moment Restrictions: A Unified Framework

We propose a unified Kernel Minimum Distance (KMD) framework for estimating and testing models defined by conditional moment restrictions. By embedding conditional moments into a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS), we construct a closed-form $V$-statistic objective function that quantifies the distance from the restrictions. We establish the $\sqrt{n}$-consistency and asymptotic normality of the associated minimum distance estimator. Within this framework, the minimized objective function naturally yields a consistent omnibus specification test. Unlike projection-based methods that require auxiliary nonparametric estimation for Neyman orthogonalization, our test inherently captures the estimation effect via a projected kernel structure. We derive asymptotic properties of the test statistics under the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis, and a sequence of local alternatives converging to the null at the parametric rate $n^{-1/2}$. The validity of a computationally simple multiplier bootstrap is established to facilitate inference. Simulation results demonstrate robust finite-sample performance, and the framework is illustrated by analyzing Engel curves using UK Family Expenditure Survey data.

econ.EM↗

Orthogonal Integrated Conditional Moment Tests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity

We propose a nonparametric integrated conditional moment (ICM) test for treatment effect heterogeneity across subpopulations defined by a given covariate subvector. Under unconfoundedness, the null is recast as a conditional moment restriction based on a Neyman-orthogonal score, which reduces the first-order sensitivity of the empirical process to nuisance parameter estimation. The test statistics are constructed as continuous functionals of a marked empirical process. We establish a uniform feasible-to-oracle approximation and derive the asymptotic properties of these test statistics under the null and fixed alternatives. We further show that the test has nontrivial power against local alternatives converging to the null at the $n^{-1/2}$ rate, and develop an easy-to-implement multiplier bootstrap for feasible inference. We also develop extensions to tests of parametric CATE specifications and to settings with endogenous treatment and a binary instrument. Finally, we apply the proposed testing approach to study whether the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on infant birth weight varies with maternal age.

econ.EM↗

Kernel Two-Sample Testing via Directional Components Analysis

Standard kernel two-sample tests, such as those based on the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD), aggregate squared differences across all directions in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). However, in finite samples, trailing directional components are noisy, which degrades test power. We propose a novel kernel-based test that resolves this by truncating the spectral decomposition of the MMD, retaining only the well-estimated leading eigen-directions. By aggregating these robust components, our method achieves superior power and robustness, particularly in high-dimensional and unbalanced settings. Furthermore, we introduce a computationally efficient parametric bootstrap procedure for approximating critical values, which is theoretically justified and significantly faster than permutation-based alternatives. Extensive simulations and empirical studies demonstrate that our method maintains strict Type I error control while delivering higher power than existing MMD-based tests.

stat.ME↗

Paired Sample Tests for High-dimensional Uncorrelatedness via Random Integration

This paper proposes a novel nonparametric test to assess the uncorrelatedness between two high-dimensional random vectors. We develop our test by generalizing the random integration proposed by Jiang et al. (2023, 2024), and the resulting test statistic estimates a weighted squared $\mathscr{L}_2$ norm of the covariance matrix. Asymptotic properties of the test statistic are derived by letting both the sample size $n$ and the dimension $p$ diverge to infinity. Under the null hypothesis of uncorrelatedness, our proposed test statistic is asymptotically normal with zero mean and unit variance, without requiring any specification of the relative magnitude regarding $n$ and $p$. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the good finite-sample performance of our proposed methods. Compared with many existing tests, our test statistic is more powerful at detecting ``weak but pervasive'' dependence while maintaining a comparable empirical size. The advantages of the proposed methods are further illustrated by an empirical analysis that assesses the correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression.

stat.ME↗