arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xiaofei Xie

Publications and source records attributed to Xiaofei Xie.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

JANUS: Synthesizing Cross-Layer Defenses Against Web Deserialization Attacks

Unsafe deserialization turns untrusted data into attacker-controlled execution, and a single vulnerability can admit diverse exploit variants that evade defenses tailored to a known exploit. Existing defenses typically operate at a single enforcement point with limited visibility into the full attack. Combining controls across layers offers complementary protection, but coordinating them to preserve legitimate functionality and adapting them to new variants requires substantial expert effort. We propose JANUS, a red-blue adversarial framework for automated cross-layer defense synthesis. Starting from a known exploit, \sys iteratively refines deployment-specific policies in an isolated offline environment. A black-box attacker probes the current policy for exploit variants using only externally observable feedback. The defender summarizes each verified variant into its security-relevant effects, uses counterfactual replay to separate complementary coverage from redundant enforcement, and jointly selects and scopes controls across layers. Each candidate policy is validated against accumulated exploits and benign workflows. We evaluate JANUS on sixteen vulnerability deployments across six Java and PHP applications against gateway, application, system, and cross-layer defenses. JANUS reduces held-out attack success to 6.2%, compared with 18.8-55.0% for the baselines, fully mitigates 13 of 16 deployments, and preserves 98.4% of benign functionality tests at a 6.9% targeted P95 latency increase.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

The Agent in the Middle: How AI-Mediated Access Reshapes Web Vulnerability Exploitation

Web services increasingly expose backend interfaces that let users delegate tasks to AI agents, which invoke service operations directly without navigating websites. This shift changes how existing Web vulnerabilities can be exploited. We investigate these changes through VELA, an executable benchmark covering 44 vulnerabilities across twelve Web application families. The benchmark preserves vulnerable backends and derives agent-facing interfaces from legitimate workflows. We evaluate three commercial agents across multiple interface configurations, using controlled comparisons to separate interface effects from agent behavior and independent oracles to verify attack outcomes. Our results show that the agent realizes every attack that direct interface invocation realizes in the reference configuration, so exploitability is set mainly by the interface: 91% of vulnerabilities remain exploitable under the reference design. Interface restrictions prevent some attacks by removing required operations or limiting input control, while retention remains high across vulnerability classes. No case-level loss in the reference configuration is attributed to agent refusal or input normalization, and in one case the agent completed an attack by supplying calls the attacker omitted. Across the tested configurations, interface design affects exploitability more than agent choice, moving retention from 39% to 95% against at most 4.5 points across agents, but some restrictive interfaces also limit legitimate workflows. Our study provides a systematic empirical account of how agent-mediated access reshapes existing Web vulnerabilities, grounding future Web architecture design in measured security outcomes and trade-offs between reducing attack exposure and preserving legitimate functionality in agent-facing services.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

AgenTest: Mining Business Rules to Test LLM Agents for Business Logic Bugs

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly execute business operations through tools and interact directly with application data and services. Beyond completing user requests, these agents must obey domain-specific business rules that constrain when actions are permitted and what data or resources may be affected. Violating such rules can lead to business logic bugs, even when a task appears successful. Detecting these bugs is difficult because the rules are rarely available as explicit, testable specifications. They are distributed across system prompts and tool definitions, while others remain implicit in domain knowledge. Existing agent testing approaches typically evaluate task success, predefined policies, or known attack scenarios. This limits their ability to systematically uncover previously unspecified business-rule violations. We present AgenTest, which mines business rules from system prompts, tool definitions, and domain knowledge, refines them into Given-When-Then specifications, and systematically tests each specification. For each extracted specification, AgenTest instantiates its Given conditions by constructing a satisfying environment state and simulated user, exercises the agent through multi-turn interactions, and checks its Then conditions over messages, tool calls, and state changes using a hybrid oracle. On the airline, retail, and telecom agents of tau2-bench with two underlying models, AgenTest produces 551 refined specifications, and detects violations of 89 and 121 distinct specifications, respectively -- 3.4X and 2.5X as many as all baselines combined. Only AgenTest detects cases where an agent improperly accesses or modifies another user's data. Moreover, about 60% of bug-triggering runs cannot be detected from the final state alone, highlighting the need to check the full interaction against explicit business rules.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

When Code Becomes an LLM Call: An Empirical Study of Call-Site Contracts in Agentic Systems

Software quality has long rested on specifications that state what code must do, and on testing and verification that check that the code does it. Agentic systems change this foundation: they replace parts of their logic, such as choosing the next tool, judging whether an action is allowed, or writing code to run, with calls to a large language model (LLM). The program still relies on what this logic must guarantee, but the model's behavior is not fixed by code, varies across runs, and can be steered by its input. The guarantee must therefore come from the program around each LLM call site, as a contract of pre-conditions, prompt constraints, and post-conditions. We present an empirical study of these contracts in 496 LLM call sites of 40 popular open-source agentic systems (13.4 MLOC, four languages). Using a multi-agent pipeline validated by 17,428 human judgments, we trace where every model output flows, derive an expected contract for each call site without access to its code, and compare it with the contract that the code implements. We find that 48% of LLM outputs reach control flow or execution, and 73% of these never reach a person. Programs enforce 78% of their constraints in code, but in the prompt, 67% of the constraints are only requested from the model. Although 82% of call sites are checked before and after the call, 63% of the expected constraints are unmet and only 5.3% of call sites satisfy their whole contract; ten recurring patterns explain 99% of the gaps. 38 mechanisms behind these gaps trigger at runtime, and a small code fix that enforces the expected constraint stops all 38. Our results show that the presence of checks says little about their adequacy, and we derive implications for agent developers, framework maintainers, and researchers.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

PropGen: Automated Property Generation for Property-Based Testing of Mobile Apps

Mobile apps often suffer from functional bugs that do not cause crashes but instead manifest as incorrect behaviors under specific user interactions. Such bugs are difficult to detect by conventional automatic testing techniques because they often lack explicit \textit{test oracles}. Property-based testing can effectively expose them by specifying intended behavior as properties and checking them under diverse interactions. However, its practical use is limited by the reliance on manually written properties, which are difficult and expensive to construct. To address this limitation, this paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to automate property construction for property-based testing of mobile apps. This is challenging in two ways. \textit{First}, it is difficult to systematically uncover and execute diverse app functionalities. \textit{Second}, it is difficult to derive valid properties from functionality execution results. To address these challenges, we introduce PropGen, which infers candidate app functionalities as hypotheses from GUI states, validates each hypothesis by executing it to collect behavioral evidence, synthesizes properties from the collected evidence, and refines imprecise properties based on testing feedback. We implemented PropGen and evaluated it on 12 real-world Android apps. The results show that PropGen can effectively identify and execute app functionalities, generate valid properties, and refine most imprecise ones. Across all apps, PropGen inferred 1,210 valid functionalities and correctly executed 977 of them, compared with 491 and 187 for the baseline. It generated 985 properties, 912 of which were valid, and successfully refined 118 of 127 imprecise ones exposed during testing. Using the resulting properties, we found 25 previously unknown functional bugs, many of which were missed by existing testing techniques.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

When Flaws Cascade: Understanding Vulnerabilities and Exploitation Chains in JavaScript Engines

JavaScript engines are pivotal to modern web browsers, enabling the execution of dynamic and interactive web applications. However, their complexity and widespread adoption make them prime targets for attackers exploiting vulnerabilities. While existing research has focused on detecting vulnerabilities of JavaScript engines, a significant gap remains in systematically understanding the characteristics of these vulnerabilities, including their symptoms, root causes, and exploitability. This paper bridges this gap by presenting the first comprehensive empirical study on vulnerabilities in JavaScript engines, investigating their characteristics and potential exploitation strategies. We construct a dataset comprising 241 vulnerabilities across four mainstream JavaScript engines from 2017 to 2024. Through in-depth analysis, we first develop taxonomies for symptoms and root causes. Building on this understanding, we investigate the exploitability of these vulnerabilities, identifying key prerequisites and extracting vulnerability trigger chains that demonstrate how logical errors propagate into memory safety violations. Additionally, we analyze the mitigation strategies to counter these exploits. Finally, we summarize key implications for various stakeholders, including developers and researchers, offering actionable insights to improve the security and resilience of JavaScript engines.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Before Acting, Change the State: Prospective State Intervention for Web Agents under Deceptive Interfaces

LLM-based Web agents can autonomously complete user tasks, yet deceptive interfaces can steer them toward outcomes that conflict with users' interests. Existing defenses primarily intervene on agent behavior through blocking, guidance, or replanning. We identify a distinct failure mode: a task-valid action can still realize an unauthorized consequence because of the current Web state. This motivates treating task-relevant Web state itself as a runtime control target. We introduce Veer, an agent-side runtime defense that leaves task planning to the base agent and intervenes on Web state when a proposed action would produce an unauthorized consequence. Before modifying the live environment, Veer constructs a prospective intervention trajectory toward a safe task-relevant state and executes it with runtime grounding and verification. Across TrickyArena and WebDecept, Veer achieves the highest safe task completion in all three evaluation settings, exceeding the next-best defense by 15.9 and 25.0 percentage points on TrickyArena-Single and TrickyArena-Multi, respectively, while reducing dark-pattern success on WebDecept to 0.3%. These gains persist across dark-pattern types and all 12 agent, model, and benchmark configurations. Ablations show that active state intervention provides the largest gain, while prospective rollout and temporal evidence contribute additional improvements. These results establish task-relevant Web state as an effective runtime control target for protecting Web agents from deceptive outcomes.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Path2Spec: Path-Aware Specification Generation via Large Language Models

Formal specifications are critical for program verification, comprehension, and maintenance. However, manually writing them is costly and difficult to scale. Recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) are promising for automated specification generation, but existing methods suffer from quality issues. We analyze a state-of-the-art approach and find that at least 34.6% of successfully verified specifications actually fail to meaningfully capture the program's distinct behavior, which is a quality issue not captured by metrics that only measure verification success. We further found that a major factor contributing to such hidden quality issues stems from the design of existing methods: these methods treat a program as a single unit, resulting in overly general, coarse-grained constraints. To this end, we introduce Path2Spec, a divide-and-conquer framework that addresses these limitations through systematic path-based reasoning. Path2Spec leverages LLMs to extract all execution paths from an input program, generates path-specific specifications for each, and merges them into a comprehensive overall specification. For complex programs where path-based generation struggles, Path2Spec employs a decompose-then-retry strategy that recursively breaks a program into smaller subprograms based on logical branches, generates specifications for each, and merges them back. We evaluate Path2Spec on two public benchmarks: SG-Bench (120 programs) and SV-COMP (265 programs). Results show that Path2Spec can outperform the state-of-the-art baseline SpecGen: 87.5% versus 66.7% on SG-Bench, and 83.0% versus 44.2% on SV-COMP. Human evaluation further validates that Path2Spec generates higher-quality specifications with precise semantic alignment to the code.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

GraphAHA: Graph-Based Adaptive Search with Heterogeneous Actions for Test-Time Code Generation

Test-time scaling improves code generation by spending additional inference budget (e.g., calls or tokens) on direct sampling, feedback-conditioned repair, and reasoning-guided implementation. Search-based methods can allocate this budget adaptively, but two challenges remain. First, tree-structured search treats each generation history as a separate state even when trajectories converge to the same program, duplicating evaluation and preventing statistics from being shared. Second, sampling, repair, and reasoning have complementary and state-dependent payoffs, making online allocation among them difficult under a finite budget. To address these challenges, we propose an adaptive graph search method with heterogeneous actions (GraphAHA). GraphAHA organizes the test-time code generation in a typed directed acyclic graph. Equivalent programs are merged into a single code node, allowing their downstream search statistics to be reused across all discovery paths. Hierarchical Thompson sampling then selects whether to generate a new state or follow an existing successor and, for generation, chooses among the type-valid sampling, reasoning, implementation, and repair operations. Evaluated on LiveCodeBench and CodeContests with Qwen2.5-Coder and DeepSeek-Coder, GraphAHA achieves the best score in 18 of 20 cases. For Pass@1 measured using visible tests, it outperforms the strongest baseline for both models on both benchmarks by 4.1 percentage points on average, demonstrating more effective use of a fixed inference budget.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Detecting Backdoors in Object Detection via Pre-NMS Prediction Distribution Shift

Object detection models deployed in safety-critical applications remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks that cause targeted misbehaviors when a hidden trigger is present. Existing detection methods either rely on trigger inversion or exploit architecture-specific assumptions, and critically, representative existing methods fail to generalize reliably to scene-level attacks, where a single trigger induces anomalous behavior across all objects in the scene simultaneously. We present DistScan, a backdoor detection framework based on a simple but previously unexploited observation: backdoor injection systematically shifts a model's pre-NMS prediction class distribution away from its training class frequencies, even on clean inputs without any trigger present. DistScan aggregates intermediate class predictions over a clean validation set and flags a model as backdoored if the resulting distribution deviates significantly from the training class frequencies, requiring no model weight access, no trigger knowledge, and no additional training. Extensive experiments on MS-COCO and PASCAL VOC across two architectures and three scene-level attack scenarios demonstrate that DistScan substantially outperforms existing methods, improving average detection accuracy over the best-performing applicable baseline by 27.32 percentage points.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

AgentAntibody: An Adaptive Immune System for Defending LLM Agents against Prompt Injection

Prompt injection remains a critical threat to LLM agents, yet existing defenses treat each task as a self-contained problem, independent of previous encounters. In practice, user requests are often underspecified: they describe the desired outcome without fully specifying acceptable behavior. An injection can exploit this ambiguity, causing the agent to complete the task in a way the user would reject. As the user's expectations become clearer through concrete cases, a defense should learn from each encounter and apply what it learns to the next. Inspired by adaptive immunity, we propose AgentAntibody, which equips LLM agents with a self-evolving immune system against prompt injection. AgentAntibody represents its evolving understanding of the user's security boundary as a persistent library of antibodies. At runtime, the library recognizes threats to this boundary and mounts corresponding immune responses. Across encounters, it evolves to strengthen the agent's immunity to future attacks. Extensive experiments across three benchmarks and four backbone LLMs show that, by learning the user's boundary through experience, AgentAntibody outperforms existing defenses in preventing harmful actions while preserving legitimate task completion, even when the harmful and legitimate actions are both compatible with the stated task.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

PRWeaver: Evaluating LLM-Based Code Auditors against Long-Horizon Malicious Pull Requests

LLM-based code auditors are increasingly integrated into pull-request (PR) workflows, yet their reliability against adversarial changes distributed across repository evolution remains poorly understood. We introduce PRWeaver, a benchmark of 208 execution-validated attacks from ten real-world repositories, each instantiated under four matched review renderings (832 renderings in total). We evaluate three PR-auditing agents across six auditor-model systems. Across all systems, decomposing an attack changes detection by at most five percentage points, showing that commit boundaries alone do not explain evasion. In contrast, per-PR interleaving at $N=16$ and coherent carrier fusion reduce detection by 5-13 and 10-18 points, respectively. Under whole-window review at $N=24$, detection falls to 16-22%, compared with 50-60% under per-PR review. These results show that access to repository history is insufficient: concealment becomes most effective when benign and malicious changes jointly occupy the auditor's active review context or when the stated purpose plausibly accounts for the attack-bearing diff.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

TrajAudit: Automated Failure Diagnosis for Agentic Coding Systems

Agentic systems have been widely studied to automate coding tasks such as bug fixing and feature implementation. As these systems increasingly operate on complex codebases, understanding where and why they fail becomes essential for iterative refinement and operational reliability. Existing automated failure diagnosis approaches leverage \textit{task execution trajectories}, yet they struggle with trajectories produced by repository-level coding agents due to two key properties. First, these trajectories are often long, spanning many execution steps, making it difficult for LLMs to track the causal chain of failure over the execution history. Second, these trajectories are laden with noise, containing substantial low-signal observations such as redundant program structures and verbose code context, which can interfere with LLM reasoning. To address these challenges, we propose \textit{TrajAudit}, an automated failure diagnosis framework specifically for trajectories produced by repository-level coding agents. TrajAudit employs an investigator agent supported by two modules: one reduces failure-irrelevant noisy context through semantic saliency folding, and the other derives preliminary diagnostic guidance from test failure reports as prior knowledge to help LLMs focus on likely failure regions. The investigator agent can further invoke tools to inspect folded content on demand, enabling a focused investigation without losing access to the full trajectory context. We also introduce \textit{RootSE}, a benchmark of 102 real-world instances from repository-level coding tasks, each annotated with the earliest decisive error step and a justification. Experiments on RootSE show that TrajAudit outperforms the strongest baselines by 10.8\% and 21.6\% in exact failure localization accuracy in the with- and without-reference settings, respectively, demonstrating its effectiveness.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

From Signals to Behaviors: Evidence-Based Android Malware Detection

Android malware remains a persistent threat, and detecting it accurately is a long-standing open problem. Whether an app is malicious depends on what it actually does and the context in which it does it, not on the surface signals it happens to exhibit. Existing detectors instead reason about proxies for behavior, such as learned features or local code slices, and flag whatever deviates from these proxies as malicious. But deviation is not maliciousness: benign apps that merely look unusual are over-flagged, evolving malware that looks ordinary slips through. We argue that detection should be behavior-oriented: recover an app's potentially malicious behaviors and judge which are truly malicious. To realize this, we present Praxis, which structures detection as a hypothesize-confirm-judge pipeline: it hypothesizes candidate behaviors from coarse static signals, confirms each by grounding it in code evidence verified with program analysis, and judges the confirmed behaviors in context: the user's awareness, the app's functional context, and how they compose into an attack. For a malicious app, Praxis returns a verdict and the supported behaviors. We evaluate Praxis against seven baselines across three challenging settings. It achieves the best overall detection performance (87.4% F1), outperforming the baselines by 18.6-34.8 percentage points. On high-permission benign apps, it reduces the false-positive rate to 13.0%, a reduction of 41.1-67.0 percentage points compared with the baselines. Beyond binary detection, Praxis recovers fine-grained malicious behaviors at 87.3% F1, outperforming prior behavior-level approaches by 56.5-73.4 percentage points. Ablation studies show that each stage of the pipeline contributes to the final performance.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

ARGUS: Defending LLM Agents Against Context-Aware Prompt Injection

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed as task-oriented software systems that use runtime context to decide and act on behalf of users. This delegation model makes prompt injection especially dangerous: an attacker can hide a context-aware instruction inside evidence the agent must use to decide what to do. Existing benchmarks and defenses largely miss this setting. Benchmarks often use context-insensitive tasks where the user prompt already specifies the intended action, together with generic attack payloads independent of context. Existing defenses also do not capture the causal support from runtime evidence to concrete actions, which makes them incomplete and ineffective for context-dependent tasks. We present AgentLure, a benchmark for context-dependent tasks under context-aware prompt injection. AgentLure spans four agentic domains and eight attack vectors across six attack surfaces. To defend this setting, we propose ARGUS, a causal-provenance auditor for LLM agents. Instead of relying only on tool authorization or suspicious-context detection, ARGUS verifies whether each proposed action has a complete benign causal justification. It builds an influence-provenance graph, labels runtime spans, grounds action arguments in supporting evidence, and releases an action only when benign evidence entails it and task invariants hold. On AgentLure, ARGUS reduces attack success rate from 28.8% to 3.8% while preserving 87.5% clean utility, significantly outperforming existing defenses in the security-utility tradeoff.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

EvoEye: Self-Evolving Runtime Monitoring for Autonomous Driving Systems

Runtime monitoring is essential for detecting impending hazards in autonomous driving systems (ADSs). However, existing ADS runtime monitors have fixed detection capabilities: rule-based monitors cover only manually specified hazards, while learning-based monitors depend heavily on their initial training data and may retain substantial prediction errors. We therefore propose EvoEye, which identifies the current monitor's errors, generates informative executions accordingly, and updates the monitor through self-evolution. To enable effective self-evolution, EvoEye combines a capable runtime monitor with targeted scenario acquisition. FusionMonitor learns cross-module temporal interactions for collision prediction, while BlindSpotEvolver converts current prediction errors into search guidance and uses density-aware mutation to acquire informative executions for subsequent monitor updates. We evaluate EvoEye on Baidu Apollo with CARLA in representative highway and urban scenarios. FusionMonitor improves frame-level Recall by up to 37.8 percentage points at a false positive rate of 0.05, with 2.49 ms latency and 2.8-4.2 seconds of median warning time. Under the same budget, BlindSpotEvolver outperforms uniform and violation-oriented sampling by up to 13.2 F1 points on previously missed unsafe contexts.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been actively integrated into modern software systems as critical components, introducing a new type of software vulnerability, LLM-in-the-Loop (LiL) vulnerability, in which threats are caused by LLMs. Although some studies have attempted to investigate the impact of LiL vulnerabilities, they have unfortunately failed to clearly distinguish LiL vulnerabilities from conventional ones, leaving the understanding of real-world LiL vulnerabilities an open problem. To address this gap, we first clearly define the scope of LiL vulnerability, and discuss the differences between LiL vulnerabilities and vulnerabilities that exist in LLM systems but are not really caused by LLMs (i.e., LLM-ecosystem vulnerabilities). Then, we construct the first LiL vulnerability dataset, LiLCVE, covering 41 LiL vulnerabilities and 75 LLM-ecosystem vulnerabilities, to facilitate the risk analysis of LLM-integrated software. The analysis of LiLCVE reveals that LiL vulnerabilities have higher severity than LLM-ecosystem vulnerabilities and conventional software vulnerabilities, with 15.5% and 30.3% more critical vulnerabilities, respectively. Furthermore, given the high severity of LiL vulnerabilities and the potential of LLM-based vulnerability repair methods in patching conventional software vulnerabilities. We explore the capabilities of existing widely-used LLM-based methods in repairing vulnerabilities in LiLCVE. Experimental results on 20 agent-model configuration demonstrate that LiL vulnerabilities are far more challenging to fix, with an average decrease of 10.8% Pass@1 rate compared to other types of vulnerabilities. More critically, three categories, Generated Query Execution, Agent Action, and Model Output Rendering, frequently receive 0% repair success rates.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Diagnosis-Driven Automatic Repair for Agentic Workflow via Symbolic Inference

Platform-orchestrated agentic workflows have become a popular paradigm for developing LLM-based applications. However, their reliability remains a major challenge due to the uncertainty of LLM outputs, complex inter-node dependencies, and heterogeneous tool interactions. Existing agentic workflow optimization and agent enhancement methods primarily rely on trajectory-level feedback. Without explicitly identifying the underlying failure root causes, their resulting repair plans are often insufficiently targeted. We propose FlowFixer, a diagnosis-driven automated repair framework for agentic workflows. FlowFixer first transforms workflow executions into unified symbolic traces and performs symbolic inference to derive executable behavioral specifications that capture node correctness, temporal dependencies, and causal relationships. Based on specification verification, it conducts failure attribution and root cause analysis, and then generates targeted repair patches. To reduce verification costs, FlowFixer further employs a multi-dimensional pre-execution assessment to filter infeasible repairs before dynamic verification. We evaluate FlowFixer on workflow failures collected from three popular development platforms: Dify, Coze and n8n. Results show that FlowFixer achieves a repair success rate of 71.3%, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by 11.9% to 27.6%. It also improves failure attribution accuracy by 4.8% to 33.1% and root cause analysis accuracy by 15.3% to 38.8%. This work offers a new perspective on reliable diagnosis and repair of agentic workflows through symbolic modeling and inference.

cs.SE↗