arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xianzhong Li

Publications and source records attributed to Xianzhong Li.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Keep Pace to Learn: Movable Antennas Restore the Backpropagated Gradient Under User Mobility

When a mobile terminal takes part in over-the-air training, its own motion rotates the gradient that travels back through it; a movable antenna that keeps pace with the terminal rotates it back---without any channel estimate. We give a speed law: under a scalar conditional-mean model of the physical return, landing the residual displacement inside the first positive lobe of the spatial correlation keeps the conditional mean gradient a descent direction, which, given sufficient travel, fixes a critical actuator-to-terminal speed ratio. We further prove a bias--jitter law: under the same scalar conditional-mean model and with zero effective bias, independent zero-mean Gaussian jitter of any finite amplitude scales the conditional mean gradient without reversing its direction, whereas a sub-wavelength systematic bias can reverse it. This result motivates prioritizing bias calibration to preserve gradient direction. Simulations on 3GPP CDL-A channels show that an antenna keeping pace with the terminal achieves near-CSI accuracy without digital channel correction, reaching 98.58 % compared with 98.59% for the ideal-CSI reference. The simulations also show that partial compensation can support learning when the residual displacement falls within a later positive correlation lobe, so a faster actuator does not necessarily yield higher accuracy. Separate positioning simulations show a sharp accuracy loss under systematic bias but little degradation under zero-mean Gaussian jitter of comparable spatial scale.

eess.SP↗

Wait to Learn: Lobes and Dead Zones in Physical Backpropagation over an Aging Single-Antenna Channel

Sometimes the best way to correct an aged gradient is to wait. In physical backpropagation, a receiver returns its loss gradient through the reciprocal channel. With a single moving antenna, the mean gradient returned at the antenna is the true one counter-rotated by the phase of the temporal correlation. In simulation, uncorrected training fails in negative correlation lobes and revives in positive ones. At correlation zeros the return is independent of the forward channel, so no linear correction has a mean to recover; near them, more calibration barely helps, but holding the return until the next correlation extremum does.

eess.SP↗

Coherent but Discordant: Rotate, Don't Invert, to Backpropagate Through an Aging Channel

A channel can be almost perfectly coherent and still teach a transmitter the wrong direction. In physical ("over-the-air") backpropagation, the receiver sends its loss gradient back through the reciprocal channel; when the terminal moves in between, mobility does not merely add noise to the returned gradient, it rotates it. Under a scalar conditional mean model the rotation is set by the phase of the temporal correlation, so coherence, which measures only its magnitude, is the wrong ruler: in simulation, channels with absolute value of rho greater than 0.9 drive uncorrected training to 51.7% accuracy, while phase correction restores 92.5%. Arrays add a twist. Near zeros of the trace correlation, scalar correction fails even with rho known exactly, yet most of the information is still there: noise has moved it onto neighbouring antennas. Re-indexing the ports by the displacement, with zero digital feedback, recovers the lost performance in simulation, and so does rotating the returned seed with the unitary polar factor of the conditional mean operator, never inverting it; aligning each antenna's phase with its own past makes things worse. An exact array identity explains all three. The lesson fits in one line: correct the rotation, not the stretch.

eess.SP↗