arXiv subjects

Xiangmin Yi

Publications and source records attributed to Xiangmin Yi.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ActionOPD: Distilling Decisions, Not Tokens

Distilling capable language-model agents into smaller models requires aligning the student's behavior with the teacher's. This raises a fundamental question: at which states and at what granularity should this alignment be performed? Offline imitation provides dense but token-specific supervision and can suffer from state-distribution mismatch. Token-level on-policy distillation (OPD) addresses this mismatch but typically requires teacher token probabilities and compatible tokenization. We argue that semantic actions provide a natural unit of supervision for agent distillation. We introduce ActionOPD, an action-level on-policy distillation method motivated by maximizing expected teacher-action likelihood at student-encountered states. At each such state, ActionOPD samples actions from both the student and a black-box teacher, rewarding student actions according to their semantic agreement with the sampled teacher actions. Through policy optimization, ActionOPD aligns the student's action-level behavior with the teacher's decisions without requiring reproduction of teacher-written reasoning or access to teacher token probabilities. Training Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B with two teachers on diverse, curated tool-use tasks yields average gains of 3.3-6.9 percentage points across four out-of-distribution benchmarks. ActionOPD scales favorably with student size and teacher capability, without requiring the teacher and student to share a model family or tokenizer. On $τ^2$-bench, ActionOPD achieves competitive performance against offline distillation and token-level OPD. We further explore Self-ActionOPD with a same-model teacher and privileged context. These results establish ActionOPD as a promising approach to agent distillation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Verifiable Process Rewards for Agentic Reasoning

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet existing approaches predominantly rely on sparse outcome-level feedback, posing a substantial credit-assignment challenge in long-horizon agentic tasks. In this work, we study structured agentic reasoning problems that admit symbolic or algorithmic task-solving oracles. We propose Verifiable Process Rewards (VPR), a training framework that repurposes such task oracles as action-level process verifiers, providing dense rewards for intermediate actions and enabling fine-grained credit assignment. We instantiate VPR in three distinct settings: a search-based oracle for Sokoban, a constraint-based oracle for Sudoku, and a posterior-based oracle for Minesweeper. To optimize policies with these rewards, we introduce oracle-guided state-group rollout and locally normalized optimization. Empirically, VPR-trained Qwen3-4B outperforms outcome-reward GRPO and VinePPO across all three training environments. When jointly trained on math data and all three game environments, VPR achieves the highest average general-reasoning performance and strongest agentic results among the compared training configurations. To further assess its applicability to more general agentic tool-use settings, we apply VPR-style action-level supervision to $τ^2$-bench using an expert LLM as a reference policy and observe improved performance over outcome-reward GRPO on held-out tasks. Together, these results position VPR as a promising approach for leveraging reliable task oracles to improve agentic reasoning, while highlighting its dependence on the availability and reliability of task oracles and the challenge of extending intermediate verification to less structured, open-ended environments.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Task-Utility IQA: Rethinking Image Quality Assessment in Embodied Tasks

Image quality assessment (IQA) underpins embodied imaging pipelines by judging whether visual quality satisfies downstream tasks, yet most existing methods learn task-agnostic scores aligned with generic human ratings on static benchmarks. This objective mismatches embodied and interactive settings, where image adequacy depends on task goals, context, and action requirements that shape an agent's decisions. We argue that IQA should shift from score regression to goal-conditioned judgment defined by embodied task utility. To this end, we propose an MLLM-based embodied IQA agent framework that reasons about task requirements, grounds quality evidence, and produces decision-facing assessments. A compact VisDrone evidence study shows that conventional perceptual metrics and generic MLLM-based IQA scores are weak proxies for downstream VLM task success, while a task-conditioned utility score better predicts whether visual input supports the target task. These findings support a task-utility-oriented reframing of IQA for embodied, explainable, and decision-aware visual perception.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

VS-Bench: Evaluating VLMs for Strategic Abilities in Multi-Agent Environments

Recent advancements in Vision Language Models (VLMs) have expanded their capabilities to interactive agent tasks, yet existing benchmarks remain limited to single-agent or text-only environments. In contrast, real-world scenarios often involve multiple agents interacting within rich visual and textual contexts, posing challenges with both multimodal observations and strategic interactions. To bridge this gap, we introduce Visual Strategic Bench (VS-Bench), a multimodal benchmark that evaluates VLMs for strategic abilities in multi-agent environments. VS-Bench comprises ten vision-grounded environments that cover cooperative, competitive, and mixed-motive interactions. The performance of VLM agents is evaluated across three dimensions: perception measured by element recognition accuracy; strategic reasoning measured by next-action prediction accuracy; and decision-making measured by normalized episode return. Extensive experiments on fifteen leading VLMs show that, although current models exhibit strong perception abilities, there remains a significant gap to optimal performance in reasoning and decision-making, with the best-performing model attaining 46.6% prediction accuracy and 31.4% normalized return. We further analyze the key factors influencing performance, conduct human experiments, and examine failure modes to provide a deeper understanding of VLMs' strategic abilities. By standardizing the evaluation and highlighting the limitations of existing models, we envision VS-Bench as a foundation for future research on strategic multimodal agents. Code and data are available at https://vs-bench.github.io.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Scalable UAV Multi-Hop Networking via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models

In disaster scenarios, establishing robust emergency communication networks is critical, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offer a promising solution to rapidly restore connectivity. However, organizing UAVs to form multi-hop networks in large-scale dynamic environments presents significant challenges, including limitations in algorithmic scalability and the vast exploration space required for coordinated decision-making. To address these issues, we propose MRLMN, a novel framework that integrates multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) and large language models (LLMs) to jointly optimize UAV agents toward achieving optimal networking performance. The framework incorporates a grouping strategy with reward decomposition to enhance algorithmic scalability and balance decision-making across UAVs. In addition, behavioral constraints are applied to selected key UAVs to improve the robustness of the network. Furthermore, the framework integrates LLM agents, leveraging knowledge distillation to transfer their high-level decision-making capabilities to MARL agents. This enhances both the efficiency of exploration and the overall training process. In the distillation module, a Hungarian algorithm-based matching scheme is applied to align the decision outputs of the LLM and MARL agents and define the distillation loss. Extensive simulation results validate the effectiveness of our approach, demonstrating significant improvements in network performance over the MAPPO baseline and other comparison methods, including enhanced coverage and communication quality.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

VolleyBots: A Testbed for Multi-Drone Volleyball Game Combining Motion Control and Strategic Play

Robot sports, characterized by well-defined objectives, explicit rules, and dynamic interactions, present ideal scenarios for demonstrating embodied intelligence. In this paper, we present VolleyBots, a novel robot sports testbed where multiple drones cooperate and compete in the sport of volleyball under physical dynamics. VolleyBots integrates three features within a unified platform: competitive and cooperative gameplay, turn-based interaction structure, and agile 3D maneuvering. These intertwined features yield a complex problem combining motion control and strategic play, with no available expert demonstrations. We provide a comprehensive suite of tasks ranging from single-drone drills to multi-drone cooperative and competitive tasks, accompanied by baseline evaluations of representative reinforcement learning (RL), multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) and game-theoretic algorithms. Simulation results show that on-policy RL methods outperform off-policy methods in single-agent tasks, but both approaches struggle in complex tasks that combine motion control and strategic play. We additionally design a hierarchical policy which achieves 69.5% win rate against the strongest baseline in the 3 vs 3 task, demonstrating its potential for tackling the complex interplay between low-level control and high-level strategy. To highlight VolleyBots' sim-to-real potential, we further demonstrate the zero-shot deployment of a policy trained entirely in simulation on real-world drones.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

MARSHAL: Incentivizing Multi-Agent Reasoning via Self-Play with Strategic LLMs

Developing Large Language Models (LLMs) to cooperate and compete effectively within multi-agent systems (MASs) is a critical step towards more advanced intelligence. While reinforcement learning (RL) has proven effective for enhancing reasoning in single-agent tasks, its extension to multi-turn, multi-agent scenarios remains underexplored due to the challenges of long-horizon credit assignment and agent-specific advantage estimation. To address these challenges, we introduce MARSHAL, an end-to-end RL framework that incentivizes Multi-Agent Reasoning through Self-play witH strAtegic LLMs in both cooperative and competitive games. MARSHAL features a turn-level advantage estimator that aligns learning signals with each interaction for credit assignment, and an agent-specific advantage normalization to stabilize multi-agent training. By learning with self-play across cooperative and competitive games, MARSHAL agents trained from Qwen3-4B develop strong strategic abilities, with up to 28.7% performance improvements in held-out games. More importantly, the capability acquired through self-play generalizes beyond games, yielding consistent performance gains of MASs in reasoning benchmarks. When integrated into leading MASs, our MARSHAL agent achieves significant zero-shot performance gains of up to 10.0% on AIME, 7.6% on GPQA-Diamond, and 3.5% on average across all benchmarks. These results establish self-play in strategic games as a powerful approach for developing generalizable multi-agent reasoning capabilities in LLMs.

cs.AI↗