arXiv subjects

Wang Yang

Publications and source records attributed to Wang Yang.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SLIDE: Search-to-List Item Distillation for Single-Rollout Generative Retrieval

Generative retrieval (GR) typically relies on item-level beam search to retrieve candidates, leaving cross-item dependencies unmodeled and limiting direct optimization of list-level objectives. A natural alternative is to generate the entire list within a single autoregressive trajectory. However, greedy decoding with directly trained list-wise models substantially underperforms beam search. We identify two contributing factors: the broader search space explored by beam search and the positional bias of scarce positive signals, which deprives later positions of adequate supervision. To address these challenges, we propose $\textbf{SLIDE}$, a search-to-list item distillation framework that decouples offline search from online list generation. A teacher model retrieves high-quality candidates through offline item-level beam search, providing additional conversion-relevant supervision beyond sparse behavioral labels. Their Semantic IDs (SIDs) are then concatenated in beam-score order to form list-wise distillation targets. This search-to-list conversion transforms candidates retrieved along separate search paths into sequential item-generation targets within a single trajectory. Trained on these targets, the student generates the Top-$K$ list in a single greedy pass, also decoupling teacher scaling from online deployment. Experiments on FORGE and Taobao Search show that SLIDE substantially improves retrieval quality under single greedy decoding and, with stronger offline teachers, surpasses the beam-search reference. Supplementary RL experiments support the effectiveness of list-level generation.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Topological multicomponent superconductivity with sizable $s$-wave admixture in twisted bilayer cuprates

We investigate multicomponent superconductivity in twisted bilayer cuprates with order parameter $s+d_1 e^{iϕ_1}+d_2 e^{iϕ_2}$, where $s=s_1+s_2$ is the layer-symmetric $s$-wave pairing and $d_i$ is the $d$-wave pairing in layer $i$. When $ϕ_1-ϕ_2\neq 0,π$, this three-component state spontaneously breaks time-reversal and $C_4$ rotational symmetries and can realize a topologically nontrivial phase. Ginzburg-Landau analysis and self-consistent mean-field calculations show that this state is stabilized over a broad parameter regime. We further identify nematic Kerr anisotropy as a key signature distinguishing it from $s+id$ and $d_1+e^{iϕ}d_2$, and find that its Josephson critical current remains sizable near the $45^{\circ}$ twist. Our results show that $s$-wave pairing does not preclude chiral topological superconductivity, pointing to twisted cuprates as a more robust platform than previously appreciated.

cond-mat.supr-con↗

arXiv2026

What Can't Jev Decide? Probing the Limits of One-Pass Decision Models

Jev and its open replicas choose among the options a caller supplies with a single forward pass, fast enough to decide inside an agent loop. We ask what such a model cannot decide, and find a simple limit: Jev cannot make a decision that an LLM makes only by writing out intermediate steps. On a benchmark that varies one factor at a time, Jev finds and selects records without error up to 20k tokens and 64 options, but once the answer depends on two or more updates of one user, accuracy falls, to 53-80% at sixteen updates, because similar records interfere. Given a stale summary of the state, Jev follows it. On real decision items graded by how many thinking tokens a reference LLM needs, Jev answers 97.5% of the items that one forward pass of that LLM solves, but only 74% of the others. Jev also does not know its limit: its confidence flags the errors it makes itself but not those it inherits from a stale input, and neither an explicit nor a trained hand-off option catches the latter. The open models we evaluate share these limits. Checking the state such models rely on requires a model that reasons.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Sequent-Prover: Training Agents for Formal, Checkable SMT-based Reasoning

We introduce Sequent-Prover, a family of verifier-using language-model agents, and the post-training framework that produces them. Agents reason in an executable SMT-LIB scratchpad: they write complete SMT-LIB programs, query Z3 across turns, inspect solver feedback, repair formalizations, and terminate with an explicit answer. Our recipe, verifier-conditioned trajectory distillation, bootstraps from a noisy teacher proposal policy by sampling multi-turn trajectories, retaining the successful tail that is correct, non-trivial, grounded, and executable, then applying supervised fine-tuning and trajectory-level preference optimization. Because solver success alone does not guarantee semantic faithfulness, we evaluate task accuracy, k-sample reliability, and SMT program quality. Across 37 benchmarks and 7,254 problems per model family, post-training raises the 4B model's per-attempt accuracy from 85.6% to 97.0% and four-sample all-correct reliability (pass^4}) from 64.1% to 91.7%. It also reduces average SMT calls from 4.10 to 2.52 and tokens per attempt from 18.97k to 12.72k. Sequent-Prover agents give answers backed by executable formal artifacts.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Demystifying Hybrid Thinking: Can LLMs Truly Switch Between Think and No-Think?

Hybrid thinking enables LLMs to switch between reasoning and direct answering, offering a balance between efficiency and reasoning capability. Yet our experiments reveal that current hybrid thinking LLMs only achieve partial mode separation: reasoning behaviors often leak into the no-think mode. To understand and mitigate this, we analyze the factors influencing controllability and identify four that matter most: (1) larger data scale, (2) using think and no-think answers from different questions rather than the same question, (3) a moderate increase in no-think data number, and (4) a two-phase strategy that first trains reasoning ability and then applies hybrid think training. Building on these findings, we propose a practical recipe that, compared to standard training, can maintain accuracy in both modes while significantly reducing no-think output length (from 1085 to 585 on MATH500) and occurrences of reasoning-supportive tokens such as "wait" (from 5917 to 522 on MATH500). Our findings highlight the limitations of current hybrid thinking and offer directions for strengthening its controllability. The code is available at: https://github.com/SR-A-W/demystifying-hybrid-thinking

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Renormalization group analysis for bosonization coefficients in half-odd-integer Kitaev spin chains

Based on a renormalization-group (RG) analysis, we study the bosonization formulas for spin-$S$ Kitaev-Gamma and Kitaev-Heisenberg-Gamma chains in the parameter regime $K<0$, $Γ>0$, and $J>0$, with $S$ being a half-odd integer. We find that the effects associated with the breaking of emergent continuous symmetries in the bosonization formulas scale as $1/S$ in the large-$S$ limit, in qualitative agreement with density-matrix renormalization-group (DMRG) results for Kitaev-Gamma chains. For Kitaev-Heisenberg-Gamma chains, the low-energy excitations are characterized by incommensurate gapless wave vectors, and symmetry analysis yields ten independent bosonization coefficients, five of which are predicted by the RG analysis to be independent of the Heisenberg coupling up to linear order. Our results provide useful input for determining magnetic ordering tendencies in two-dimensional Kitaev spin models within a quasi-one-dimensional approach.

cond-mat.str-el↗

arXiv2026

Correcting WHERE, Preserving HOW: Compositional Generalization for Vision-Language-Action Models via Referential Guidance

While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable flexible action generation, their generalization across diverse environmental elements, including manipulated objects, destinations, and backgrounds, is limited by the lack of diversity in robotic training data. Trained end-to-end on such data, VLAs tend to exploit visual shortcuts, associating actions with task-irrelevant visual features rather than the intended task semantics. These shortcuts block recomposition of elements already seen by the policy, that is, compositional generalization. Existing approaches mitigate such entanglement through task-relevant perception or targeted data diversification, but offer no explicit mechanism for unseen recomposition and require backbone-specific modifications with retraining. We observe that under such recomposition, VLAs often fail at global grounding while retaining local manipulation skills that recover near the correct target in familiar configurations. Therefore, we propose Referential Guidance (ReGuide), a training-free wrapper that, given object poses from a grounding module, combines semantic and geometric rebinding to guide the end-effector into demonstration-supported configurations of the instructed referent, where the frozen policy can resume execution. Experiments in simulation across multiple VLA backbones as well as on a real robot show that ReGuide improves success rates under compositional shifts by up to 56.8 and 75.0 percentage points, respectively, while preserving standard-task performance.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

How to Loop MoE: Flatten the Experts, Untie the Attention

Looped Transformers reuse one block of layers several times: by spending extra computation they push a model of fixed size further, and so use its parameters more fully; while sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) models activate only a few of many experts for each token. Looped MoE bridges these two design philosophies and gives MoE models new potential for better expert usage, but it raises a question: how to loop a MoE? We answer it with Foil. With the expert parameters and the expert compute per token held fixed, Foil (1) flattens the experts, halving the expert layers, doubling the experts per layer and doubling the passes, so that every routing decision chooses from a larger pool, and (2) unties the attention, giving each pass its own attention parameters while the experts and routers stay shared. Experiments show that Foil clearly outperforms the unflattened looped baseline: at 20B tokens every Foil model has lower pretraining loss than the baseline; at 100B tokens the loss improves monotonically with the degree of flattening, the most flattened Foil ending 0.012 nat below the baseline at equal parameters and compute, with downstream accuracy on par or better; untying the attention also yields more balanced and more confident routing at equal shape. Our ablations analyse why Foil works and turn the findings into design guidance for looped MoE: the returns of looping and of widening the expert layers amplify each other, routing confidence tracks healthy expert use better than load balance, and a sparse looped MoE should therefore use more experts per layer and more passes. Code and configurations are available at https://github.com/SR-A-W/how-to-loop-moe.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Mechanistic Diagnostics of Spatial Lexical Bias in Multimodal Large Language Model Spatial Reasoning

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) remain unreliable on spatial multiple-choice questions, and their failures are often attributed to poorly attended visual information. We identify a complementary failure mode, spatial lexical bias: a spatial relation word added to the answer options can act as a lexical-semantic distractor that draws the model's decision toward that option. Using nine open-weight MLLMs, we show that this phenomenon is widespread. We then isolate diagnostic cases in which a model answers a binary spatial question correctly yet consistently chooses a newly added third spatial option, which we call binary-stable but ternary-fragile cases. Leveraging mechanistic interpretability tools on these cases, we find that the failure arises on the language side rather than the visual side: visual attention analyses and residual-stream probes show the correct spatial relation remains internally available, while irrelevant-option controls, activation patching, and sparse component interventions trace the bias to specific LLM-side channels and neurons. Accordingly, we show that a lightweight LLM-only DPO update on tiny single-object-pair synthetic data mitigates the bias, lifting four-way robust accuracy by up to 100 points on synthetic data, and by 68.0, 32.6, and 20.1 points on broader evaluation datasets WhatsUp, SpatialMQA-Direct, and VSR.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Path-Lock Expert: Separating Reasoning Mode in Hybrid Thinking via Architecture-Level Separation

Hybrid-thinking language models expose explicit /think and /no_think modes, but current designs do not separate them cleanly. Even in /no_think mode, models often emit long and self-reflective responses, causing reasoning leakage. Existing work reduces this issue through better data curation and multi-stage training, yet leakage remains because both modes are still encoded in the same feed-forward parameters. We propose Path-Lock Expert (PLE), an architecture-level solution that replaces the single MLP in each decoder layer with two semantically locked experts, one for /think and one for /no_think, while keeping attention, embeddings, normalization, and the language-model head shared. A deterministic control-token router selects exactly one expert path for the entire sequence, so inference preserves the dense model's per-token computation pattern and each expert receives mode-pure updates during supervised fine-tuning. Across math and science reasoning benchmarks, PLE maintains strong /think performance while producing a substantially stronger mode separation, a /no_think mode with higher accuracy and far less reasoning leakage. On Qwen3-4B, for example, compared to the SFT-only baseline on AIME24, PLE generates 17x fewer reflective tokens (6.01 vs. 0.35 per answer) and 2x shorter outputs (8665 vs. 4101 tokens), and improves /no_think accuracy from 35.33% to 44.67%, while maintaining /think-mode performance (61.33% vs. 60.00%). These results suggest that controllable hybrid thinking is fundamentally an architectural problem, and separating mode-specific feed-forward pathways is a simple and effective solution.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Many-body wave function and edge magnetization of an open $p+is$ superconducting chain

Although BCS wave functions for superconductors under periodic boundary conditions are well established, obtaining an explicit form of the many-body BCS wave function under open boundary condition is usually a nontrivial problem. In this work, we construct the exact BCS ground-state wave function of a one-dimensional spin-$\frac12$ superconductor with $p+is$ pairing symmetry under open boundary conditions for special sets of parameters. The spin magnetization on the edges is calculated explicitly using the obtained wave function. Our work is useful for obtaining deeper understandings of open $p+ is$ superconducting chains on a wave-function level.

cond-mat.supr-con↗

arXiv2026

Crossover and Changeover in Spin-1 Kitaev-$Γ$ Chain with Uniaxial Single-ion Anisotropy

Recent advances in bond-directional spin chains have revealed extensive emergent phenomena and unconventional criticality. Here we investigate the spin-1 Kitaev-$Γ$ chain with uniaxial single-ion anisotropy (SIA) using large-scale density-matrix renormalization group calculations and bosonization analysis. Tuning the SIA strength reveals a crossover from the Kitaev phase to the large-$D$ phase, evidenced by the excitation gap changing from quadratic to linear, the coexistence and smooth evolution of spin-nematic and string order parameters, and the suppression of the double-peak specific heat. For negative SIA, we uncover a changeover from a first-order transition to a continuous one between the dimerized and Haldane phases. The continuous transition belongs to the \textrm{SU(2)$_2$} Wess-Zumino-Witten universality class with central charge $c=3/2$, a rare instance in a system without continuous symmetry. Our results establish the Kitaev-$Γ$ chain as a minimal platform for controlling crossover and changeover phenomena.

cond-mat.str-el↗

arXiv2026

Speculative Thinking: Enhancing Small-Model Reasoning with Large Model Guidance at Inference Time

Recent advances leverage post-training to enhance model reasoning performance, which typically requires costly training pipelines and still suffers from inefficient, overly lengthy outputs. We introduce Speculative Thinking, a training-free framework that enables large reasoning models to guide smaller ones during inference at the reasoning level, distinct from speculative decoding, which operates at the token level. Our approach is based on two observations: (1) reasoning-supportive tokens such as "wait" frequently appear after structural delimiters like "\n\n", serving as signals for reflection or continuation; and (2) larger models exhibit stronger control over reflective behavior, reducing unnecessary backtracking while improving reasoning quality. By strategically delegating reflective steps to a more capable model, our method significantly boosts the reasoning accuracy of reasoning models while shortening their output. With the assistance of the 32B reasoning model, the 1.5B model's accuracy on MATH500 increases from 83.2% to 89.4%, marking a substantial improvement of 6.2%. Simultaneously, the average output length is reduced from 5439 tokens to 4583 tokens, representing a 15.7% decrease. Moreover, when applied to a non-reasoning model (Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct), our framework boosts its accuracy from 74.0% to 81.8% on the same benchmark, achieving a relative improvement of 7.8%.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Longer Context, Deeper Thinking: Uncovering the Role of Long-Context Ability in Reasoning

Recent language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet the influence of long-context capacity on reasoning remains underexplored. In this work, we hypothesize that current limitations in reasoning stem, in part, from insufficient long-context capacity, motivated by empirical observations such as (1) higher context window length often leads to stronger reasoning performance, and (2) failed reasoning cases resemble failed long-context cases. To test this hypothesis, we examine whether enhancing a model's long-context ability before Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) leads to improved reasoning performance. Specifically, we compared models with identical architectures and fine-tuning data but varying levels of long-context capacity. Our results reveal a consistent trend: models with stronger long-context capacity achieve significantly higher accuracy on reasoning benchmarks after SFT. Notably, these gains persist even on tasks with short input lengths, indicating that long-context training offers generalizable benefits for reasoning performance. These findings suggest that long-context modeling is not just essential for processing lengthy inputs, but also serves as a critical foundation for reasoning. We advocate for treating long-context capacity as a first-class objective in the design of future language models.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

100-LongBench: Are de facto Long-Context Benchmarks Literally Evaluating Long-Context Ability?

Long-context capability is considered one of the most important abilities of LLMs, as a truly long context-capable LLM enables users to effortlessly process many originally exhausting tasks -- e.g., digesting a long-form document to find answers vs. directly asking an LLM about it. However, existing real-task-based long-context evaluation benchmarks have two major shortcomings. First, benchmarks like LongBench often do not provide proper metrics to separate long-context performance from the model's baseline ability, making cross-model comparison unclear. Second, such benchmarks are usually constructed with fixed input lengths, which limits their applicability across different models and fails to reveal when a model begins to break down. To address these issues, we introduce a length-controllable long-context benchmark and a novel metric that disentangles baseline knowledge from true long-context capabilities. Experiments demonstrate the superiority of our approach in effectively evaluating LLMs.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Mid-Think: Training-Free Intermediate-Budget Reasoning via Token-Level Triggers

Hybrid reasoning language models are commonly controlled through high-level Think/No-think instructions to regulate reasoning behavior, yet we found that such mode switching is largely driven by a small set of trigger tokens rather than the instructions themselves. Through attention analysis and controlled prompting experiments, we show that a leading ``Okay'' token induces reasoning behavior, while the newline pattern following `` '' suppresses it. Based on this observation, we propose Mid-Think, a simple training-free prompting format that combines these triggers to achieve intermediate-budget reasoning, consistently outperforming fixed-token and prompt-based baselines in terms of the accuracy-length trade-off. Furthermore, applying Mid-Think to RL training after SFT reduces training time by approximately 15% while improving final performance of Qwen3-8B on AIME from 69.8% to 72.4% and on GPQA from 58.5% to 61.1%, demonstrating its effectiveness for both inference-time control and RL-based reasoning training.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

AgentCE-Bench: Agent Configurable Evaluation with Scalable Horizons and Controllable Difficulty under Lightweight Environments

Existing Agent benchmarks suffer from two critical limitations: high environment interaction overhead (up to 41\% of total evaluation time) and imbalanced task horizon and difficulty distributions that make aggregate scores unreliable. To address these issues, we propose AgentCE-Bench built around a unified grid-based planning task, where agents must fill hidden slots in a partially completed schedule subject to both local slot constraints and global constraints. Our benchmark offers fine-grained control through two orthogonal axes: \textbf{Scalable Horizons}, controlled by the number of hidden slots $H$, and \textbf{Controllable Difficulty}, governed by a decoy budget $B$ that determines the number of globally misleading decoy candidates. Crucially, all tool calls are resolved via static JSON files under a \textbf{Lightweight Environment} design, eliminating setup overhead and enabling fast, reproducible evaluation suitable for training-time validation. We first validate that $H$ and $B$ provide reliable control over task horizon and difficulty, and that AgentCE-Bench exhibits strong domain consistency and model discriminability. We then conduct comprehensive experiments across 13 models of diverse sizes and families over 6 domains, revealing significant cross-model performance variation and confirming that AgentCE-Bench provides interpretable and controllable evaluation of agent reasoning.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Theoretical study of spin-dependent transport in WSe$_2$-based vertical spin valves

We theoretically investigate spin-dependent transport in a TMD-based vertical spin valve, taking WSe$_2$ as a representative example. Using effective Hamiltonians for the heterostructure and the Landauer formula, we derive the transmission and reflection coefficients within a transfer-matrix approach. The calculated magnetoresistance shows an oscillatory dependence on the WSe$_2$ thickness when the Fermi level is tuned near the valence-band maximum. The effects of gate voltage and exchange fields on the magnetoresistance are further analyzed. We also identify a Fabry-Pérot-like interference contribution to the magnetoresistance, which can enhance or even induce negative magnetoresistance in certain thickness regimes. Our results provide a qualitative understanding of the negative magnetoresistance observed in WSe$_2$-based spin valves and may offer useful insights for the design of tunable spintronic devices.

cond-mat.mes-hall↗