arXiv subjects

Wang Claire

Publications and source records attributed to Wang Claire.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Stereotypically Yours: Portrayal and Perception of Race-Coded AI Companions

AI companions can purportedly adopt racial personas, raising questions about how they represent identity and how users interpret these portrayals. We combined an algorithmic audit of race-coded AI personas with interviews with 12 companion users who interacted with a probe. Our audit revealed systematic differences, such as Asian-coded male personas receiving higher submissiveness scores than White counterparts, and Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous male personas receiving higher aggression scores than their White counterparts in open-weight models. Interviews revealed that participants envisioned AI companions as offering cultural familiarity and outside perspectives, but differed in which portrayals they considered meaningful or stereotypical. Some rejected overt racial signaling while still expecting culturally distinctive responses. Triangulating these findings with theory, we highlight how social norms and cultural expectations complicate efforts to support meaningful racial representation without reproducing stereotypes. We discuss how companion personalization should be evaluated beyond user satisfaction to account for broader representational harms.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

First Impressions: How Placement Shapes the Influence of AI Summaries

AI-generated summaries increasingly mediate how people interpret information across platforms, including product reviews on e-commerce sites. Using Amazon's AI summaries as a case study, we conducted a preregistered, randomized experiment (N = 278) comparing how AI summaries and user reviews shaped product perceptions, and how their influence varied with valence and presentation order. We found that both AI summaries and user reviews influenced participants' opinions, with negative summaries having a larger effect than positive ones. Presentation order was the most important factor: the first source anchored judgment and only user reviews could displace an existing anchor. Although participants reported preferring user reviews, they often underestimated the influence of AI summaries on their judgments. Our findings show how the placement of AI summaries shapes user perception and highlight opportunities to design interfaces that support more deliberate judgments about when to rely on summaries and when to examine the underlying content directly.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

The Wisdom of the Loudest: A Large-Scale Audit of Generative Search on Reddit

Online communities are valued not only for answers, but for the diversity of experiences and perspectives they contain. Generative search increasingly mediates access to this discourse, yet little is known about which community voices survive retrieval and synthesis. We audit Reddit Answers using 10,000 queries from 20 advice- and support-seeking communities, repeated three times to produce 30,000 answers over 14.68M comments. We find that differences across runs are driven primarily by retrieval, answers routinely combine evidence across communities, and selection strongly favors already-visible, top-level comments. Formal and directive language is more likely to be surfaced, while experiential voice is less likely to survive selection and is further weakened during synthesis, with first-person singular language declining sharply. These findings show that community-grounded generative search is not neutral summarization, and should be designed not only for relevance and fluency, but also for provenance, plurality, and legibility.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2025

WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI

There has been growing interest from both practitioners and researchers in engaging end users in AI auditing, to draw upon users' unique knowledge and lived experiences. However, we know little about how to effectively scaffold end users in auditing in ways that can generate actionable insights for AI practitioners. Through formative studies with both users and AI practitioners, we first identified a set of design goals to support user-engaged AI auditing. We then developed WeAudit, a workflow and system that supports end users in auditing AI both individually and collectively. We evaluated WeAudit through a three-week user study with user auditors and interviews with industry Generative AI practitioners. Our findings offer insights into how WeAudit supports users in noticing and reflecting upon potential AI harms and in articulating their findings in ways that industry practitioners can act upon. Based on our observations and feedback from both users and practitioners, we identify several opportunities to better support user engagement in AI auditing processes. We discuss implications for future research to support effective and responsible user engagement in AI auditing and red-teaming.

cs.HC↗