arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Vuong Bui

Publications and source records attributed to Vuong Bui.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

An optimal refinement-compatible bijection between singleton-free partitions and partitions without cyclic adjacencies

It is well known that the number of partitions of $[n]$ without singletons equals the number of partitions of $[n]$ in which no block contains two cyclically adjacent elements $i,i+1\pmod{n}$. Bernhart remarked that there might be no simple bijection between these two classes. Although Callan later constructed an algorithmic bijection proving the stronger equidistribution of singletons and adjacencies, his construction proceeds through multiple rounds of exchanges. Therefore, Bernhart's remark may still retain some validity, as suggested by Chen and Wang. In this article, we address this remark by giving a direct ``one-round'' bijection between the two classes. Unlike Callan's bijection, our map is closely compatible with the refinement order on partitions: in one direction it only decomposes blocks, while its inverse only merges blocks, with a single exceptional pair when $n>2$ is even. We further observe that this exception is unavoidable, establishing the optimality of the bijection with respect to the refinement order. The specific local form of these operations --- splitting off only singleton blocks and merging a singleton only with the block containing its cyclic neighbor --- also ensures that the construction restricts, without modification, to a bijection between the corresponding classes of noncrossing partitions.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

A direct injection for the strong $q$-log-convexity of Touchard polynomials

We provide a direct injection for the well-known strong log-convexity of the Bell numbers $B_n$, that is $B_mB_n\le B_{m-1}B_{n+1}$ for every $1\le m\le n$. Our injection $Π_m\timesΠ_n\to Π_{m-1}\timesΠ_{n+1}$, where $Π_n$ denotes the set of all partitions of $[n]$, preserves the total number of blocks in the pair of partitions. In other words, it is also an injection for the strong $q$-log-convexity of Touchard polynomials, a result established by Chen, Wang, and Yang using analytical arguments. As an application of the injection, we also recover a related result of Chern, Diaconis, Kane, and Rhoades.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

A sharper log-convexity inequality for Bell numbers

We prove a stronger version of the log-convexity inequality for the Bell numbers $B_n$. In particular, for $n\ge 5$, we have \[ B_{n+1}B_{n-1} - (B_n)^2 \ge \sum_{i=1}^{n} F_i (B_{n-i})^2, \] where $F_i$ is the $i$-th Fibonacci number with $F_0=F_1=1$. The simple proof is mostly combinatorial with elementary inequalities.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Explicit entropy bounds for symmetric nearest-neighbor subshifts

We provide another approach to Friedland's result that the topological entropy $h$ of a symmetric nearest-neighbor subshift is computable. Instead of the previous algebraic technique, our approach is mostly combinatorial and involves only counts of locally admissible patterns $C_n$ of a cube $[1,n]^d$ in $\mathbb Z^d$. The main idea is a reflection-gluing construction: we flip admissible patterns and merge them along their boundaries. In addition to a short and elementary proof, another advantage is that our approach yields an explicit convergence rate in arbitrary dimensions, whereas obtaining such a rate is already complicated for $\mathbb Z^3$ in Friedland's approach. In particular, we show that for every $n\ge 1$, \[ \frac{1}{n^d}(\log C_{n+1} - q_d(n)\log|Σ|) \le h \le \frac{1}{n^d} \log C_n, \] where $Σ$ is the alphabet and \[ q_d(n)=(2^d-1)\sum_{k=0}^{d-1} \frac{\binom{d}{k}}{2^d-2^k}\, n^k. \]

math.DS↗
arXiv2026

The mapping index through the lens of the cross-index

We study the cross-index of free \(G\)-posets as a combinatorial analogue of the equivariant topological index. We demonstrate that the cross-index exhibits many structural properties closely paralleling those of the topological index, while its behavior with respect to unions displays a pronounced dichotomy depending on the acting group. Specifically, if \(P = A \cup B\) is a union of \(G\)-invariant subposets, then for \(G = \mathbb{Z}_2\) we obtain the sharp inequality \[ \operatorname{xind} P \le \operatorname{xind} A + \operatorname{xind} B + 1, \] which is directly analogous to the classical union inequality for the topological index. In contrast, for every group \(G\neq \mathbb{Z}_2\), this phenomenon fails in general, and we establish the best possible weaker estimate \[ \operatorname{xind} P \le \operatorname{xind} A + 2(\operatorname{xind} B+1). \] This reveals a fundamental distinction between the \(\mathbb{Z}_2\)-equivariant and non-\(\mathbb{Z}_2\)-equivariant settings at the purely combinatorial level. As further consequences, we compare the cross-index with both the topological index and the simplicial index, showing in particular that the gap between the cross-index and the topological index can be arbitrarily large. These results clarify the role of the cross-index as a combinatorial analogue of the equivariant topological index and further strengthen the interplay between equivariant topological methods and combinatorial structures endowed with symmetry.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

A convolutional approach to bounding the number of polyominoes

Although known lower bounds for the growth rate $λ$ of polyominoes, or Klarner's constant, are already close to the empirically estimated value $4.06$, almost no conceptual progress on upper bounds has occurred since the seminal work of Klarner and Rivest (1973). Their approach, based on enumerating millions of local neighborhoods (also called ``twigs'') yielded $λ\le 4.649551$, later refined by Barequet and Shalah (2022) to $λ\le 4.5252$ using trillions of configurations. The inefficiency lies in representing each polyomino as an almost unrestricted sequence of neighborhoods once the large set of neighborhoods is fixed. We introduce a recurrence-based approach that constrains how local neighborhoods concatenate. Using a small system of convolution-type recurrences, we obtain $λ\le 4.5238$. The proof is short, self-contained, and hand-checkable. Despite the marginal numerical improvement, the main contribution is methodological: replacing trillions of configurations with a concise one-page system of recurrences. In addition, we present a new technique for rigorously bounding the growth of recurrences to any precision, applicable to a broad range of settings with nonnegative coefficients. The resulting upper bound even comes with a nice feature: a small set of parameters serves as the certificate for the bound, that is, one does not need to check more than a few arithmetic calculations to trust the bound.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

A short proof of an upper bound on the growth constant of polyiamonds

We provide a short and elementary proof that the growth constant of polyiamonds is at most $1+2z+3z^2$ for the unique real root $z$ of the equation $2z^3+z^2-1=0$. This coincidentally suffices to recover the best known upper bound $3.6108$. Unlike the previous proof of this bound, which relied on computer-assisted technical arguments and the counts of polyiamonds with up to 75 triangles, our method is based on a straightforward recurrence that can be verified by hand with minimal effort.

math.CO↗
arXiv2025

There exist infinite cube-free words over any sequence of binary alphabets

We prove that for any sequence of binary alphabets $\mathcal{A}_1,\mathcal{A}_2,\dots$, there exists a cube-free word $c_1c_2\dots$ so that $c_1\in\mathcal{A}_1,c_2\in\mathcal{A}_2,\dots$. In particular, for every $n$, there are at least $1.35^n$ cube-free words in $\mathcal{A}_1\times\mathcal{A}_2\times\dots\times \mathcal{A}_n$. We also prove that if the list of alphabets is computable then one of these words is computable and its $n$th letter can be computed in time polynomial in $n$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2025

Growth of bilinear maps III: Decidability

The following notion of growth rate can be seen as a generalization of joint spectral radius: Given a bilinear map $*:\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^d$ with nonnegative coefficients and a nonnegative vector $s\in\mathbb R^d$, denote by $g(n)$ the largest possible entry of a vector obtained by combining $n$ instances of $s$ using $n-1$ applications of $*$. Let $λ$ denote the growth rate $\limsup_{n\to\infty} \sqrt[n]{g(n)}$. Rosenfeld showed that the problem of checking $λ\le 1$ is undecidable by reducing the problem of joint spectral radius. In this article, we provide a simpler reduction using the observation that matrix multiplication is actually a bilinear map. Moreover, we extend the reduction to show that checking $λ\le 1$ is still undecidable even if $s$ is positive. If there is no restriction on the signs, we can also show that the problem of checking if the system can produce a zero vector is undecidable by reducing the problem of checking the mortality of a pair of matrices. This answers a question asked by Rosenfeld. Beside that, we confirm a remark of Rosenfeld that the problem does not become harder when we introduce more bilinear maps and more starting vectors. It is known that if the vector $s$ is strictly positive, then the limit superior $λ$ is actually a limit. However, we show that when $s$ is only nonnegative, the problem of checking the existence of the limit is undecidable. This also answers a question asked by Rosenfeld. We provide a formula for the growth rate $λ$ in terms of the diagonals of matrices corresponding to a special structure called ``linear pattern''. A condition is given so that the limit $λ$ exists. This actually provides a simpler proof for the existence of the limit $λ$ when $s>0$. An important corollary of the formula is the computability of the growth rate,....

math.CO↗
arXiv2025

A characterization of the Carathéodory number for $H$-convexity

We show that the Carathéodory number for $H$-convexity is the maximum of two parameters: the Helly number for $H$-convexity and the cone number of $H$. The cone number in this article is defined as the maximal number of points of $H$ in conical position with an empty positive hull relative to the remaining points. Earlier partial results by Boltyanski and Martini can provide an exact value for the Carathéodory number only when the Helly number is $1$ or $2$. We further establish connections between the Carathéodory numbers for $H$-convexity and that for $K$-strong convexity, where $H$ is the set of normals of $K$. Specifically, the Carathéodory number for $H$-convexity provides a lower bound for that of $K$-strong convexity. Moreover, if $K$ is a polytope, which has $|H|$ facets, then the Carathéodory number for $K$-strong convexity is at most the maximum of $|H|-1$ and the Carathéodory number for $H$-convexity. We conjecture a characterization of when the bound $|H|-1$ is attained. It is a consequence of a broader conjecture stating that the Carathéodory number for $K$-strong convexity is at most the maximum of the Carathéodory numbers for $H'$-convexity over all subsets $H'\subseteq H$. Finally, we observe that the Carathéodory number is at least the Helly number in any convex-structure where all sets are ordinarily convex.

math.CO↗
arXiv2025

An explicit condition for boundedly supermultiplicative subshifts

We study some properties of the growth rate of $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{F})$, that is, the language of words over the alphabet $\mathcal{A}$ avoiding the set of forbidden factors $\mathcal{F}$. We first provide a sufficient condition on $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{A}$ for the growth of $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{F})$ to be boundedly supermultiplicative. That is, there exist constants $C>0$ and $α\ge0$, such that for all $n$, the number of words of length $n$ in $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{F})$ is between $α^n$ and $Cα^n$. In some settings, our condition provides a way to compute $C$, which implies that $α$, the growth rate of the language, is also computable whenever our condition holds. We also apply our technique to the specific setting of power-free words where the argument can be slightly refined to provide better bounds. Finally, we apply a similar idea to $\mathcal{F}$-free circular words and in particular we make progress toward a conjecture of Shur about the number of square-free circular words.

math.CO↗
arXiv2024

Bounding Klarner's constant from above using a simple recurrence

Klarner and Rivest showed that the growth of the number of polyominoes, also known as Klarner's constant, is at most $2+2\sqrt{2}<4.83$ by viewing polyominoes as a sequence of twigs with appropriate weights given to each twig and studying the corresponding multivariate generating function. In this short note, we give a simpler proof by a recurrence on an upper bound. In particular, we show that the number of polyominoes with $n$ cells is at most $G(n)$ with $G(0)=G(1)=1$ and for $n\ge 2$, \[ G(n) = 2\sum_{m=1}^{n-1} G(m)G(n-1-m). \] It should be noted that $G(n)$ has multiple combinatorial interpretations in literature.

math.CO↗
arXiv2024

Growth of recurrences with mixed multifold convolutions

Generalizing some popular sequences like Catalan's number, Schröder's number, etc, we consider the sequence $s_n$ with $s_0=1$ and for $n\ge 1$, \begin{multline*} s_n=\sum_{x_1+\dots+x_{\ell_1}=n-1} κ_1 s_{x_1}\dots s_{x_{\ell_1}} + \dots +\sum_{x_1+\dots+x_{\ell_{t'}}=n-1} κ_{t'} s_{x_1}\dots s_{x_{\ell_{t'}}}+\\ \max_{x_1+\dots+x_{\ell_{t'+1}}=n-1} κ_{t'+1} s_{x_1}\dots s_{x_{\ell_{t'+1}}} + \dots + \max_{x_1+\dots+x_{\ell_t}=n-1} κ_t s_{x_1}\dots s_{x_{\ell_t}}, \end{multline*} where $x_i$ are nonnegative integers, $\ell_1,\dots,\ell_t$ are positive integers, and $κ_1,\dots,κ_t$ are positive reals. We show that it is possible to compute the growth rate $λ$ of $s_n$ to any precision. In particular, for every $n\ge 2$, \[ \sqrt[n]{\frac{κ^*}{\mathcal L(n-1) s_1} s_n} \le λ\le \sqrt[n]{3^{18\log 3 + 2\log\frac{s_1\mathcal L^2}{κ^*}} n^{3\log n + 12\log 3 + \log\frac{s_1\mathcal L^2}{κ^*}} s_n}, \]where $\mathcal L=\max_i \ell_i$ and $κ^*=κ_i$ for some $i$ with $\ell_i\ge 2$, and the logarithm has the base $\frac{\mathcal L+1}{\mathcal L}$. The constants in the inequalities are not very well optimized and serve mostly as a proof of concept with the ratio of the upper bound and the lower bound converging to $1$ as $n$ goes to infinity.

math.CO↗
arXiv2024

A bound on the joint spectral radius using the diagonals

The primary aim of this paper is to establish bounds on the joint spectral radius for a finite set of nonnegative matrices based on their diagonal elements. The efficacy of this approach is evaluated in comparison to existing and related results in the field. In particular, let $Σ$ be any finite set of $D\times D$ nonnegative matrices with the largest value $U$ and the smallest value $V$ over all positive entries. For each $i=1,\dots,D$, let $m_i$ be any number so that there exist $A_1,\dots,A_{m_i}\inΣ$ satisfying $(A_1\dots A_{m_i})_{i,i} > 0$, or let $m_i=1$ if there are no such matrices. We prove that the joint spectral radius $ρ(Σ)$ is bounded by \[ \max_i \sqrt[m_i]{\max_{A_1,\dots,A_{m_i}\inΣ} (A_1\dots A_{m_i})_{i,i}} \le ρ(Σ) \le \max_i \sqrt[m_i]{\left(\frac{UD}{V}\right)^{3D^2} \max_{A_1,\dots,A_{m_i}\inΣ} (A_1\dots A_{m_i})_{i,i}}. \]

math.CO↗
arXiv2024

Growth of bilinear maps II: Bounds and orders

A good range of problems on trees can be described by the following general setting: Given a bilinear map $*:\mathbb R^d\times\mathbb R^d\to\mathbb R^d$ and a vector $s\in\mathbb R^d$, we need to estimate the largest possible absolute value $g(n)$ of an entry over all vectors obtained from applying $n-1$ applications of $*$ to $n$ instances of $s$. When the coefficients of $*$ are nonnegative and the entries of $s$ are positive, the value $g(n)$ is known to follow a growth rate $λ=\lim_{n\to\infty} \sqrt[n]{g(n)}$. In this article, we prove that for such $*$ and $s$ there exist nonnegative numbers $r,r'$ and positive numbers $a,a'$ so that for every $n$, \[ a n^{-r}λ^n\le g(n)\le a' n^{r'}λ^n. \] While proving the upper bound, we actually also provide another approach in proving the limit $λ$ itself. The lower bound is proved by showing a certain form of submultiplicativity for $g(n)$. Corollaries include a lower bound and an upper bound for $λ$, which are followed by a good estimation of $λ$ when we have the value of $g(n)$ for an $n$ large enough.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

An asymptotic lower bound on the number of polyominoes

Let $P(n)$ be the number of polyominoes of $n$ cells and $λ$ be Klarner's constant, that is, $λ=\lim_{n\to\infty} \sqrt[n]{P(n)}$. We show that there exist some positive numbers $A,T$, so that for every $n$ \[ P(n) \ge An^{-T\log n} λ^n. \] This is somewhat a step toward the well known conjecture that there exist positive $C,θ$ so that $P(n)\sim Cn^{-θ}λ^n$ for every $n$. In fact, if we assume another popular conjecture that $P(n)/P(n-1)$ is increasing, we can get rid of $\log n$ to have \[ P(n)\ge An^{-T}λ^n. \] Beside the above theoretical result, we also conjecture that the ratio of the number of some class of polyominoes, namely inconstructible polyominoes, over $P(n)$ is decreasing, by observing this behavior for the available values. The conjecture opens a nice approach to bounding $λ$ from above, since if it is the case, we can conclude that \[ λ< 4.1141, \] which is quite close to the current best lower bound $λ> 4.0025$ and greatly improves the current best upper bound $λ< 4.5252$. The approach is merely analytically manipulating the known or likely properties of the function $P(n)$, instead of giving new insights of the structure of polyominoes. The techniques can be applied to other lattice animals and self-avoiding polygons of a given area with almost no change.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

The number of polyiamonds is supermultiplicative

While the number of polyominoes is known to be supermultiplicative by a simple concatenation argument, it is still unknown whether the same applies to polyiamonds. This article proves that if $\ell,m$ are not both $1$, then $T(\ell+m)\ge T(\ell)T(m)$, for which one can say that the number of polyiamonds $T(n)$ is supermultiplicative. The method is, however, by concatenating, merging and adding cells at the same time. A corollary is an increment of the best known lower bound on the growth constant from $2.8423$ to $2.8578$.

math.CO↗