arXiv subjects

Vivian Nguyen

Publications and source records attributed to Vivian Nguyen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Adapting from Downturns: Prediction of Long-Term Conversational-Skill Development in Mental-Health Crisis Counselors

How do people learn to become better conversationalists? This question is especially important in the context of mental-health counseling, where conversational skills are essential, yet volunteer counselors often have limited access to supervision and structured feedback. Understanding how counselors develop their ability to steer conversations toward positive outcomes -- and identifying early which counselors are (not) on track to improve -- can help prioritize support for the counselors who need it most. In this work, we introduce the task of predicting, early in a conversationalist's career, whether they will eventually improve at steering conversations toward positive outcomes, and demonstrate the feasibility of this task in the case of volunteer mental-health crisis counselors. Our central insight is that people may struggle with particular kinds of moments in a conversation, and that what is especially revealing of their likelihood of future improvement is how they learn to handle those moments over time. We operationalize this insight by designing a method that identifies the types of moments a counselor initially struggles with, captures how they adapt their response when they re-encounter similar moments in subsequent conversations, and learns which early adaptations predict improvement months or even years later. While this future-prediction task is challenging, our counselor-adaptation approach yields better results than baselines that learn directly from the conversation transcript.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

From Hanging to Standing: Fabric-Formed Catenary Arches as Scalable Concrete Building Components

Concrete is the most widely used construction material globally. Despite its versatility, it is typically poured into stiff, rectilinear formwork that restricts formal exploration and leads to considerable material waste and higher carbon output. Fabric formwork offers an alternative in which flexible textiles shape fresh concrete into structurally efficient geometries such as thin shells and catenary arches. However, a persistent challenge remains that forms optimized in tension under gravity often crack when rotated into their final compression orientation. Previous research has focused on form-finding and fabrication workflows, with little attention to damage-free reorientation. This paper addresses this gap through two contributions: a CNC-milled repositionable frame with soft-to-rigid connection details enabling controlled tilt-up reorientation without damage, and a scalar reframing that embeds small repeating catenary units within larger building components such as walls and slabs. The research pursues three objectives: (1) to design and refine compatible textile-concrete combinations, with particular focus on non-woven geotextiles; (2) to develop a CNC-cut, repositionable frame system that redistributes stresses during reorientation; and (3) to devise robust soft-to-rigid connection details that permit safe demolding and handling. Through material testing and iterative prototyping, the study identifies concrete paste-geotextile pairings that produce high-quality surface finishes. A tilt-up method was developed where the frame rotates with the arch, minimizing tensile stress. Results demonstrate that catenary arches can be cast, released, and reoriented without cracking or damage. These findings advance fabric-formed concrete toward low-tech, materially efficient structures with reduced environmental impact.

cs.GR↗

arXiv2026

Wait! There's a Way Out: A Decision Mechanism for Forecasting Conversational Derailment

Forecasting conversational derailment is the task of predicting, as the conversation unfolds, whether it will eventually derail into personal attacks. Since forecasting models operate in an online fashion, they must decide whether to "trigger" an alert after each utterance--for example, to notify participants or a moderator that the conversation is at risk of derailing. Existing approaches make this decision solely based on the estimated likelihood of derailment given the preceding utterances, implicitly assuming that the conversation's future trajectory is fixed. As a result, they ignore the possibility of future recovery and incur an unnecessarily high rate of false positives. In this work we propose a method for decoupling the decision to trigger from derailment likelihood estimation. Our approach is inspired by the first human baseline on this task, which shows that humans achieve dramatically lower false positive rates by selectively deferring their decision to trigger when they anticipate that tension is likely to subside. We operationalize this insight with a deferral mechanism that uses forward-looking simulations to assess whether a tense moment admits plausible paths to recovery. Incorporating this mechanism into a state-of-the-art forecasting model substantially reduces false positives without sacrificing forecasting accuracy. More broadly, this work highlights the value of treating decision-making as a first-class component of forecasting systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Hanging in the Balance: Pivotal Moments in Crisis Counseling Conversations

During a conversation, there can come certain moments where its outcome hangs in the balance. In these pivotal moments, how one responds can put the conversation on substantially different trajectories leading to significantly different outcomes. Systems that can detect when such moments arise could assist conversationalists in domains with highly consequential outcomes, such as mental health crisis counseling. In this work, we introduce an unsupervised computational method for detecting such pivotal moments as they happen, in an online fashion. Our approach relies on the intuition that a moment is pivotal if our expectation of the outcome varies widely depending on what might be said next. By applying our method to crisis counseling conversations, we first validate it by showing that it aligns with human perception -- counselors take significantly longer to respond during moments detected by our method -- and with the eventual conversational trajectory -- which is more likely to change course at these times. We then use our framework to explore the relation of the counselor's response during pivotal moments with the eventual outcome of the session.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Taking a turn for the better: Conversation redirection throughout the course of mental-health therapy

Mental-health therapy involves a complex conversation flow in which patients and therapists continuously negotiate what should be talked about next. For example, therapists might try to shift the conversation's direction to keep the therapeutic process on track and avoid stagnation, or patients might push the discussion towards issues they want to focus on. How do such patient and therapist redirections relate to the development and quality of their relationship? To answer this question, we introduce a probabilistic measure of the extent to which a certain utterance immediately redirects the flow of the conversation, accounting for both the intention and the actual realization of such a change. We apply this new measure to characterize the development of patient-therapist relationships over multiple sessions in a very large, widely-used online therapy platform. Our analysis reveals that (1) patient control of the conversation's direction generally increases relative to that of the therapist as their relationship progresses; and (2) patients who have less control in the first few sessions are significantly more likely to eventually express dissatisfaction with their therapist and terminate the relationship.

cs.CL↗