arXiv subjects

Vishwajith Ramesh

Publications and source records attributed to Vishwajith Ramesh.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What a Deletion Certificate Covers, and Where It Expires: Auditable Removal from a Support-Vector Memory

We study deletion in a context memory that fits a support-vector boundary around stored keys and uses the resulting nonnegative coefficients to weight their values. An exactly zero coefficient lets us remove a key without changing the current normalized readout. In a three-key construction, however, a later admission makes the discarded key active in a solve over the full history. For a positive-weight key, a decremental update targets a refit on the remaining keys at the original coefficient cap, under its stated assumptions. Earlier standalone comparisons show close typical gate-score agreement, while similar keys with different values can yield larger readout differences. The journal extension tests chained deletions and admissions, checking coefficient feasibility and optimality conditions in both returned states and fresh references. The initial audit completes 66 of 80 trajectories and exposes numerical failures. A separately checked wrapper completes all 5,120 scheduled operations at unchanged acceptance thresholds, with eight initialization rescues and 84 update rescues. Its largest readout difference is 0.5273% of retained-value range. These finite results support explicit acceptance and rescue rules for the evaluated memory edits. They do not extend the current-state removal guarantee to arbitrary future admissions.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Can an AI Assistant Really Forget? Auditable Deletion from Addressable Memory

An assistant can stop repeating a fact without removing it from memory. To study this difference, we install a support-vector gate in frozen Gemma 3 and record which stored keys and values belong to each exchange. A deletion request excludes the exchange's rows from the long-range readout and recalculates the gate on what remains. We check this operation against an independent refit, then compare it with running the model again on the conversation without the exchange. This second comparison matters because the exchange may already have influenced surviving memory rows. At 4B, the gated model passed checks for recall and feasible deletion on the same six of eight records admitted by the base model, at a perplexity cost under 2%. Admission fell at the smaller and larger checkpoints with the same configuration. The edited memory agreed closely with the local refit on the registered probes, and the model disclosed fewer deleted answers than when simply instructed to forget. However, an attack evaluated separately for each record could still distinguish edited memory from memory that never stored the record. Excluding an exchange's own rows therefore provides a way to edit and audit conversation memory, while leaving a measurable difference from rebuilding it without that exchange. Additional paired studies found no update-speed advantage for the current FP32 proxy and retained-answer matching below half in every tested condition.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Exact Record Omission in Delta Attention: A Transport Criterion, Its Cost, and a Replay Certificate

An assistant can stop repeating a deleted statement while its recurrent memory still carries that statement's influence. We examine this distinction by saving the state difference immediately after a record, transporting this receipt through later updates, and comparing the correction with the state built from the same conversation with the record omitted. Unrolling the recurrence gives an exact criterion: transport reaches this never-stored state if and only if the additional differences created by later updates cancel after transport. We connect this criterion to eleven conditions on 40 prospectively selected synthetic Kimi Linear contexts, with 40 separate calibration contexts and paired whole-record uncertainty estimates. Attention masking removed all 40 exact greedy target answers, yet a fixed three-query candidate-scoring attack attained AUC 0.740 (95% interval 0.695--0.809); the measured false-positive rate was 7.5%. Prompt-only forgetting still returned 33 of the 40 targets. Checkpoint replay matched the complete declared active state and audit logits in all 80 contexts, while preserving all 120 retained answers in the evaluation cohort. An independent Qwen cohort and matched original-bf16/8-bit Kimi controls confirmed native transport mismatch above their empirical arithmetic floors. Replay also supported record replacement and sequential deletion with an intervening admission. These results provide a practical audit of both the requested memory change and the assistant's remaining behavior, with replay work determined by the surviving suffix.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2017

Deep supervised learning using local errors

Error backpropagation is a highly effective mechanism for learning high-quality hierarchical features in deep networks. Updating the features or weights in one layer, however, requires waiting for the propagation of error signals from higher layers. Learning using delayed and non-local errors makes it hard to reconcile backpropagation with the learning mechanisms observed in biological neural networks as it requires the neurons to maintain a memory of the input long enough until the higher-layer errors arrive. In this paper, we propose an alternative learning mechanism where errors are generated locally in each layer using fixed, random auxiliary classifiers. Lower layers could thus be trained independently of higher layers and training could either proceed layer by layer, or simultaneously in all layers using local error information. We address biological plausibility concerns such as weight symmetry requirements and show that the proposed learning mechanism based on fixed, broad, and random tuning of each neuron to the classification categories outperforms the biologically-motivated feedback alignment learning technique on the MNIST, CIFAR10, and SVHN datasets, approaching the performance of standard backpropagation. Our approach highlights a potential biological mechanism for the supervised, or task-dependent, learning of feature hierarchies. In addition, we show that it is well suited for learning deep networks in custom hardware where it can drastically reduce memory traffic and data communication overheads.

cs.NE↗