arXiv subjects

Vinay Nangia

Publications and source records attributed to Vinay Nangia.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Detecting Glaucoma Across Multi-ethnic Myopic and Non-Myopic Populations Using an Uncertainty-Aware Vision Transformer: A Multicentre Model Development and Validation Study

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based glaucoma detection from colour fundus photographs (CFP) offers scalable screening, but performance may decline on external datasets because of differences in ground-truth definitions, populations, and coexisting conditions such as high myopia (HM). We developed and validated a Vision Transformer-based deep learning (DL) model for glaucoma detection across multi-ethnic cohorts with and without HM. Methods: A ViT-B/16 model with predictive uncertainty estimation was developed using 56,483 CFPs (57.1% with myopia; 14.4% with HM). Glaucoma labels were standardised using clinical, imaging, and perimetry data. The model was validated on 16 independent datasets across three continents, including four datasets with explicit HM labels. Findings: Internal AUROC was 98.7% (95% CI 98.2-99.1%), with sensitivity 94.5% and specificity 97.3%. Across 16 external datasets from eight countries, AUROCs ranged from 86.4% to 99.6%. In HM eyes, internal AUROC was 97.8% (95% CI 96.1-99.2%), with sensitivity 94.8% and specificity 93.7%. External HM AUROCs were 86.5% in the Beijing Eye Study and 93.3%, 91.8%, and 85.5% in hospital-based datasets from Taiwan, Thailand, and South Korea. In an exploratory HM clinical evaluation, the model had higher CFP-only diagnostic accuracy than ophthalmologists and trained graders (92.0% vs 70.0%; p=0.008) and performed comparably to glaucoma specialists using full clinical information. Interpretation: The model showed robust glaucoma detection across myopic and non-myopic multi-ethnic populations and may support AI-assisted screening in settings with high HM prevalence.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

An integrated language-vision foundation model for conversational diagnostics and triaging in primary eye care

Current deep learning models are mostly task specific and lack a user-friendly interface to operate. We present Meta-EyeFM, a multi-function foundation model that integrates a large language model (LLM) with vision foundation models (VFMs) for ocular disease assessment. Meta-EyeFM leverages a routing mechanism to enable accurate task-specific analysis based on text queries. Using Low Rank Adaptation, we fine-tuned our VFMs to detect ocular and systemic diseases, differentiate ocular disease severity, and identify common ocular signs. The model achieved 100% accuracy in routing fundus images to appropriate VFMs, which achieved $\ge$ 82.2% accuracy in disease detection, $\ge$ 89% in severity differentiation, $\ge$ 76% in sign identification. Meta-EyeFM was 11% to 43% more accurate than Gemini-1.5-flash and ChatGPT-4o LMMs in detecting various eye diseases and comparable to an ophthalmologist. This system offers enhanced usability and diagnostic performance, making it a valuable decision support tool for primary eye care or an online LLM for fundus evaluation.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2025

Are Traditional Deep Learning Model Approaches as Effective as a Retinal-Specific Foundation Model for Ocular and Systemic Disease Detection?

Background: RETFound, a self-supervised, retina-specific foundation model (FM), showed potential in downstream applications. However, its comparative performance with traditional deep learning (DL) models remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate RETFound against three ImageNet-pretrained supervised DL models (ResNet50, ViT-base, SwinV2) in detecting ocular and systemic diseases. Methods: We fine-tuned/trained RETFound and three DL models on full datasets, 50%, 20%, and fixed sample sizes (400, 200, 100 images, with half comprising disease cases; for each DR severity class, 100 and 50 cases were used. Fine-tuned models were tested internally using the SEED (53,090 images) and APTOS-2019 (3,672 images) datasets and externally validated on population-based (BES, CIEMS, SP2, UKBB) and open-source datasets (ODIR-5k, PAPILA, GAMMA, IDRiD, MESSIDOR-2). Model performance was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Z-tests with Bonferroni correction (P<0.05/3). Interpretation: Traditional DL models are mostly comparable to RETFound for ocular disease detection with large datasets. However, RETFound is superior in systemic disease detection with smaller datasets. These findings offer valuable insights into the respective merits and limitation of traditional models and FMs.

cs.CV↗