arXiv subjects

Vikrant Singhal

Publications and source records attributed to Vikrant Singhal.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Privacy for Free in Efficient Agnostic Halfspace Learning

We provide the first computationally efficient, differentially private algorithms for agnostically learning halfspaces. In particular, we study three different settings of agnostic learning: improper learning under Gaussian and log-concave marginals; proper learning under Gaussian marginals; and semi-agnostic learning under Gaussian marginals. In all three aforementioned settings, the added cost in the sample complexity due to privacy matches the respective non-private sample complexity, implying that we get privacy for free.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Actually, All Learnable Distribution Classes Are Privately Learnable

We show that every class of distributions that is learnable up to arbitrarily small target error in total variation distance with finitely many samples is also learnable under ($\varepsilon, δ$)-differential privacy up to arbitrarily small target error with finitely many samples. This proves a conjecture of Ashtiani. Previous work by Bun, Kamath, Mouzakis, and Singhal [arXiv:2402.00267] gave a weak refutation of this conjecture, showing that this implication is not true when learnability is defined with respect to a fixed target error. In contrast, we show that, under the standard definition of learnability, the conjecture is true.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Why Forget-Only Unlearning Needs Memorization

Machine unlearning asks for a deletion algorithm whose output is close to retraining from scratch without the selected forget examples. In this work, we study forget-only unlearning, where the deletion algorithm receives only the trained model and the examples to forget, with no retained data or extra training information. We ask whether forget-only unlearning is always possible. We first show that this depends on the learning method: different datasets can produce the same trained model but require very different outputs after the same examples are removed. Using this observation, we derive lower bounds on how accurately unlearning can match retraining and instantiate them for several standard learning algorithms. We then ask what must be true when forget-only unlearning succeeds. To this end, we derive lower bounds on what an algorithm must memorize about the training data to handle arbitrary deletion requests. For simple threshold learners, the required information can be as large as the entire dataset, even though ordinary training keeps only one boundary point. Overall, our results show that information discarded during ordinary learning may be needed later for deletion, so models designed for forget-only unlearning may need to retain more information than standard training does.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Privately Estimating Monotone Statistics in Polynomial Time

We study efficient differentially private algorithms for estimating monotone statistics, i.e., statistics that are monotone under the addition of new observations. The starting point for our investigation is subsample-and-aggregate: a classical paradigm that partitions the dataset into blocks, estimates the statistic on each block, and then privately aggregates the estimates. While practical and generically applicable, this approach is quite data-hungry. We improve upon this framework for the class of monotone statistics -- compared to subsample-and-aggregate, our algorithms save a factor of $t$ in sample complexity and pay a factor of $e^t$ in running time, where $t>0$ is a tunable parameter. We complement our results with a query-complexity lower bound, showing that our algorithms are essentially optimal for this task. As an application, we obtain improved results for private eigenvalue estimation, private loss estimation, and privately estimating a single parameter of a high-dimensional model, e.g., in linear regression.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Not All Learnable Distribution Classes are Privately Learnable

We give an example of a class of distributions that is learnable up to constant error in total variation distance with a finite number of samples, but not learnable under $(\varepsilon, δ)$-differential privacy with the same target error. This weakly refutes a conjecture of Ashtiani.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Laplace and Gaussian: Exploring the Generalized Gaussian Mechanism for Private Machine Learning

Differential privacy (DP) is obtained by randomizing a data analysis algorithm, which necessarily introduces a tradeoff between its utility and privacy. Many DP mechanisms are built upon one of two underlying tools: Laplace and Gaussian additive noise mechanisms. We expand the search space of algorithms by investigating the Generalized Gaussian (GG) mechanism, which samples the additive noise term $x$ with probability proportional to $e^{-\frac{| x |}σ^β }$ for some $β\geq 1$ (denoted $GG_{β, σ}(f,D)$). The Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms are special cases of GG for $β=1$ and $β=2$, respectively. We prove that the full GG family satisfies differential privacy and extend the PRV accountant to support privacy loss computation for these mechanisms. We then instantiate the GG mechanism in two canonical private learning pipelines, PATE and DP-SGD. Empirically, we explore PATE and DP-SGD with the GG mechanism across the computationally feasible values of $β$: $β\in [1,2]$ for DP-SGD and $β\in [1,4]$ for PATE. For both mechanisms, we find that $β=2$ (Gaussian) performs as well as or better than other values in their computational tractable domains.This provides justification for the widespread adoption of the Gaussian mechanism in DP learning.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Uniformity Testing under User-Level Local Privacy

We initiate the study of distribution testing under \emph{user-level} local differential privacy, where each of $n$ users contributes $m$ samples from the unknown underlying distribution. This setting, albeit very natural, is significantly more challenging that the usual locally private setting, as for the same parameter $\varepsilon$ the privacy guarantee must now apply to a full batch of $m$ data points. While some recent work consider distribution \emph{learning} in this user-level setting, nothing was known for even the most fundamental testing task, uniformity testing (and its generalization, identity testing). We address this gap, by providing (nearly) sample-optimal user-level LDP algorithms for uniformity and identity testing. Motivated by practical considerations, our main focus is on the private-coin, symmetric setting, which does not require users to share a common random seed nor to have been assigned a globally unique identifier.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Private Means and the Curious Incident of the Free Lunch

We show that the most well-known and fundamental building blocks of DP implementations -- sum, mean, count (and many other linear queries) -- can be released with substantially reduced noise for the same privacy guarantee. We achieve this by projecting individual data with worst-case sensitivity $R$ onto a simplex where all data now has a constant norm $R$. In this simplex, additional ``free'' queries can be run that are already covered by the privacy-loss of the original budgeted query, and which algebraically give additional estimates of counts or sums.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

A Bias-Accuracy-Privacy Trilemma for Statistical Estimation

Differential privacy (DP) is a rigorous notion of data privacy, used for private statistics. The canonical algorithm for differentially private mean estimation is to first clip the samples to a bounded range and then add noise to their empirical mean. Clipping controls the sensitivity and, hence, the variance of the noise that we add for privacy. But clipping also introduces statistical bias. This tradeoff is inherent: we prove that no algorithm can simultaneously have low bias, low error, and low privacy loss for arbitrary distributions. Additionally, we show that under strong notions of DP (i.e., pure or concentrated DP), unbiased mean estimation is impossible, even if we assume that the data is sampled from a Gaussian. On the positive side, we show that unbiased mean estimation is possible under a more permissive notion of differential privacy (approximate DP) if we assume that the distribution is symmetric.

math.ST↗

arXiv2024

A Polynomial Time, Pure Differentially Private Estimator for Binary Product Distributions

We present the first $\varepsilon$-differentially private, computationally efficient algorithm that estimates the means of product distributions over $\{0,1\}^d$ accurately in total-variation distance, whilst attaining the optimal sample complexity to within polylogarithmic factors. The prior work had either solved this problem efficiently and optimally under weaker notions of privacy, or had solved it optimally while having exponential running times.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Private Distribution Learning with Public Data: The View from Sample Compression

We study the problem of private distribution learning with access to public data. In this setup, which we refer to as public-private learning, the learner is given public and private samples drawn from an unknown distribution $p$ belonging to a class $\mathcal Q$, with the goal of outputting an estimate of $p$ while adhering to privacy constraints (here, pure differential privacy) only with respect to the private samples. We show that the public-private learnability of a class $\mathcal Q$ is connected to the existence of a sample compression scheme for $\mathcal Q$, as well as to an intermediate notion we refer to as list learning. Leveraging this connection: (1) approximately recovers previous results on Gaussians over $\mathbb R^d$; and (2) leads to new ones, including sample complexity upper bounds for arbitrary $k$-mixtures of Gaussians over $\mathbb R^d$, results for agnostic and distribution-shift resistant learners, as well as closure properties for public-private learnability under taking mixtures and products of distributions. Finally, via the connection to list learning, we show that for Gaussians in $\mathbb R^d$, at least $d$ public samples are necessary for private learnability, which is close to the known upper bound of $d+1$ public samples.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Private Estimation with Public Data

We initiate the study of differentially private (DP) estimation with access to a small amount of public data. For private estimation of d-dimensional Gaussians, we assume that the public data comes from a Gaussian that may have vanishing similarity in total variation distance with the underlying Gaussian of the private data. We show that under the constraints of pure or concentrated DP, d+1 public data samples are sufficient to remove any dependence on the range parameters of the private data distribution from the private sample complexity, which is known to be otherwise necessary without public data. For separated Gaussian mixtures, we assume that the underlying public and private distributions are the same, and we consider two settings: (1) when given a dimension-independent amount of public data, the private sample complexity can be improved polynomially in terms of the number of mixture components, and any dependence on the range parameters of the distribution can be removed in the approximate DP case; (2) when given an amount of public data linear in the dimension, the private sample complexity can be made independent of range parameters even under concentrated DP, and additional improvements can be made to the overall sample complexity.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemma

We prove new lower bounds for statistical estimation tasks under the constraint of $(\varepsilon, δ)$-differential privacy. First, we provide tight lower bounds for private covariance estimation of Gaussian distributions. We show that estimating the covariance matrix in Frobenius norm requires $Ω(d^2)$ samples, and in spectral norm requires $Ω(d^{3/2})$ samples, both matching upper bounds up to logarithmic factors. The latter bound verifies the existence of a conjectured statistical gap between the private and the non-private sample complexities for spectral estimation of Gaussian covariances. We prove these bounds via our main technical contribution, a broad generalization of the fingerprinting method to exponential families. Additionally, using the private Assouad method of Acharya, Sun, and Zhang, we show a tight $Ω(d/(α^2 \varepsilon))$ lower bound for estimating the mean of a distribution with bounded covariance to $α$-error in $\ell_2$-distance. Prior known lower bounds for all these problems were either polynomially weaker or held under the stricter condition of $(\varepsilon, 0)$-differential privacy.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussians

We give the first polynomial-time, polynomial-sample, differentially private estimator for the mean and covariance of an arbitrary Gaussian distribution $\mathcal{N}(μ,Σ)$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$. All previous estimators are either nonconstructive, with unbounded running time, or require the user to specify a priori bounds on the parameters $μ$ and $Σ$. The primary new technical tool in our algorithm is a new differentially private preconditioner that takes samples from an arbitrary Gaussian $\mathcal{N}(0,Σ)$ and returns a matrix $A$ such that $A ΣA^T$ has constant condition number.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2021

Privately Learning Subspaces

Private data analysis suffers a costly curse of dimensionality. However, the data often has an underlying low-dimensional structure. For example, when optimizing via gradient descent, the gradients often lie in or near a low-dimensional subspace. If that low-dimensional structure can be identified, then we can avoid paying (in terms of privacy or accuracy) for the high ambient dimension. We present differentially private algorithms that take input data sampled from a low-dimensional linear subspace (possibly with a small amount of error) and output that subspace (or an approximation to it). These algorithms can serve as a pre-processing step for other procedures.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2021

Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributions

We give new upper and lower bounds on the minimax sample complexity of differentially private mean estimation of distributions with bounded $k$-th moments. Roughly speaking, in the univariate case, we show that $n = Θ\left(\frac{1}{α^2} + \frac{1}{α^{\frac{k}{k-1}}\varepsilon}\right)$ samples are necessary and sufficient to estimate the mean to $α$-accuracy under $\varepsilon$-differential privacy, or any of its common relaxations. This result demonstrates a qualitatively different behavior compared to estimation absent privacy constraints, for which the sample complexity is identical for all $k \geq 2$. We also give algorithms for the multivariate setting whose sample complexity is a factor of $O(d)$ larger than the univariate case.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated Gaussians

Learning the parameters of Gaussian mixture models is a fundamental and widely studied problem with numerous applications. In this work, we give new algorithms for learning the parameters of a high-dimensional, well separated, Gaussian mixture model subject to the strong constraint of differential privacy. In particular, we give a differentially private analogue of the algorithm of Achlioptas and McSherry. Our algorithm has two key properties not achieved by prior work: (1) The algorithm's sample complexity matches that of the corresponding non-private algorithm up to lower order terms in a wide range of parameters. (2) The algorithm does not require strong a priori bounds on the parameters of the mixture components.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Privately Learning High-Dimensional Distributions

We present novel, computationally efficient, and differentially private algorithms for two fundamental high-dimensional learning problems: learning a multivariate Gaussian and learning a product distribution over the Boolean hypercube in total variation distance. The sample complexity of our algorithms nearly matches the sample complexity of the optimal non-private learners for these tasks in a wide range of parameters, showing that privacy comes essentially for free for these problems. In particular, in contrast to previous approaches, our algorithm for learning Gaussians does not require strong a priori bounds on the range of the parameters. Our algorithms introduce a novel technical approach to reducing the sensitivity of the estimation procedure that we call recursive private preconditioning.

cs.DS↗