Ulrich Mutze | arXiv Science

arXiv2017

On a deterministic disguise of orthodox quantum mechanics

According to quantum theory, pure physical states correspond to equivalence classes of state vectors, where any two members of one class differ by a complex factor. The point is that such a factor does not change the probability for the occurrence of any measurement result as computed within the formalism of quantum mechanics. In the formalism to be presented here, the state vector does not only determine the probabilities for the occurrence of measurement results, rather it determines the result itself. The information which guides the selection process is obtained from the state vector in a way that is not invariant against multiplication by a complex factor. It can be seen as a kind of global phase of the state vectors. This global phase then is a perfectly hidden variable. For this presentation of quantum mechanics we have a remarkable parallelism to classical statistical mechanics: If we would know exactly the initial state of a system, we could compute the outcomes for all experiments to be done later on this system. In the quantum case the initial state is to be represented by its state vector with specified phase, e.g. as a concrete complex-valued wave function.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2013

An asynchronous leapfrog method II

A second order explicit one-step numerical method for the initial value problem of the general ordinary differential equation is proposed. It is obtained by natural modifications of the well-known leapfrog method, which is a second order, two-step, explicit method. According to the latter method, the input data for an integration step are two system states, which refer to different times. The usage of two states instead of a single one can be seen as the reason for the robustness of the method. Since the time step size thus is part of the step input data, it is complicated to change this size during the computation of a discrete trajectory. This is a serious drawback when one needs to implement automatic time step control. The proposed modification transforms one of the two input states into a velocity and thus gets rid of the time step dependency in the step input data. For these new step input data, the leapfrog method gives a unique prescription how to evolve them stepwise. The stability properties of this modified method are the same as for the original one: the set of absolute stability is the interval [-i,+i] on the imaginary axis. This implies exponential growth of trajectories in situations where the exact trajectory has an asymptote. By considering new evolution steps that are composed of two consecutive old evolution steps we can average over the velocities of the sub-steps and get an integrator with a much larger set of absolute stability, which is immune to the asymptote problem. The method is exemplified with the equation of motion of a one-dimensional non-linear oscillator describing the radial motion in the Kepler problem.

math.NA↗