arXiv subjects

Tobias Eisenreich

Publications and source records attributed to Tobias Eisenreich.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Recovering Software Architecture Intent from Historical Work Items using Generative AI: A Mixed-Methods Industry Case Study

Software architecture is often only partially captured in code, while much of the design intent lives in evolving project artifacts. In agile projects, work items, user stories, and related tracking documents preserve valuable traces of that intent, but they rarely support direct architectural analysis. This work investigates the recovery of C4 architecture diagrams from historical agile work items using an LLM-based pipeline. The semi-automatic five-step workflow employs a prompt chain, bidirectional traceability, and Chain-of-Thought reasoning to transform unstructured Azure DevOps work items into visual artifacts. Evaluated on two industry projects, we use a mixed-methods design combining qualitative expert interviews with a quantitative stability analysis. Practitioners perceive the generated architectural baselines as accurate and highly useful for system comprehension. Strictly bound by their input data, the artifacts mirror the documented intent, thereby surfacing discrepancies and architectural drift when compared to the implemented reality. Quantitatively, the workflow exhibits high stability for architectural entities but lower stability for their relationships, with relative variance compounding across generation steps. The proposed workflow demonstrates the practical viability of LLM-assisted architectural recovery based on development process artifacts.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Automating Domain-Driven Design: Experience with a Prompting Framework

Domain-driven design (DDD) is a powerful design technique for architecting complex software systems. This paper introduces a prompting framework that automates core DDD activities through structured large language model (LLM) interactions. We decompose DDD into five sequential steps: (1) establishing an ubiquitous language, (2) simulating event storming, (3) identifying bounded contexts, (4) designing aggregates, and (5) mapping to technical architecture. In a case study, we validated the prompting framework against real-world requirements from FTAPI's enterprise platform. While the first steps consistently generate valuable and usable artifacts, later steps show how minor errors or inaccuracies can propagate and accumulate. Overall, the framework excels as a collaborative sparring partner for building actionable documentation, such as glossaries and context maps, but not for full automation. This allows the experts to concentrate their discussion on the critical trade-offs. In our evaluation, Steps 1 to 3 worked well, but the accumulated errors rendered the artifacts generated from Steps 4 and 5 impractical. Our findings show that LLMs can enhance, but not replace, architectural expertise, offering a practical tool to reduce the effort and overhead of DDD while preserving human-centric decision-making.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the German Software Engineering Industry: An Empirical Study

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools have seen rapid adoption among software developers. While adoption rates in the industry are rising, the underlying factors influencing the effective use of these tools, including the depth of interaction, organizational constraints, and experience-related considerations, have not been thoroughly investigated. This issue is particularly relevant in environments with stringent regulatory requirements, such as Germany, where practitioners must address the GDPR and the EU AI Act while balancing productivity gains with intellectual property considerations. Despite the significant impact of GenAI on software engineering, to the best of our knowledge, no empirical study has systematically examined the adoption dynamics of GenAI tools within the German context. To address this gap, we present a comprehensive mixed-methods study on GenAI adoption among German software engineers. Specifically, we conducted 18 exploratory interviews with practitioners, followed by a developer survey with 109 participants. We analyze patterns of tool adoption, prompting strategies, and organizational factors that influence effectiveness. Our results indicate that experience level moderates the perceived benefits of GenAI tools, and productivity gains are not evenly distributed among developers. Further, organizational size affects both tool selection and the intensity of tool use. Limited awareness of the project context is identified as the most significant barrier. We summarize a set of actionable implications for developers, organizations, and tool vendors seeking to advance artificial intelligence (AI) assisted software development.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Leveraging Large Language Models for Use Case Model Generation from Software Requirements

Use case modeling employs user-centered scenarios to outline system requirements. These help to achieve consensus among relevant stakeholders. Because the manual creation of use case models is demanding and time-consuming, it is often skipped in practice. This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist in this tedious process. The proposed method integrates an open-weight LLM to systematically extract actors and use cases from software requirements with advanced prompt engineering techniques. The method is evaluated using an exploratory study conducted with five professional software engineers, which compares traditional manual modeling to the proposed LLM-based approach. The results show a substantial acceleration, reducing the modeling time by 60\%. At the same time, the model quality remains on par. Besides improving the modeling efficiency, the participants indicated that the method provided valuable guidance in the process.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Towards Mixed-Criticality Software Architectures for Centralized HPC Platforms in Software-Defined Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review

Centralized electrical/electronic architectures and High-Performance Computers (HPCs) are redefining automotive software development, challenging traditional microcontroller-based approaches. Ensuring real-time, safety, and scalability in software-defined vehicles necessitates reevaluating how mixed-criticality software is integrated into centralized architectures. While existing research on automotive SoftWare Architectures (SWAs) is relevant to the industry, it often lacks validation through systematic, empirical methods. To address this gap, we conduct a systematic literature review focusing on automotive mixed-criticality SWAs. Our goal is to provide practitioner-oriented guidelines that assist automotive software architects and developers design centralized, mixed-criticality SWAs based on a rigorous and transparent methodology. First, we set up a systematic review protocol grounded in established guidelines. Second, we apply this protocol to identify relevant studies. Third, we extract key functional domains, constraints, and enabling technologies that drive changes in automotive SWAs, thereby assessing the protocol's effectiveness. Additionally, we extract techniques, architectural patterns, and design practices for integrating mixed-criticality requirements into HPC-based SWAs, further demonstrating the protocol's applicability. Based on these insights, we propose an exemplary SWA for a microprocessor-based system-on-chip. In conclusion, this study provides a structured approach to explore and realize mixed-criticality software integration for next-generation automotive SWAs, offering valuable insights for industry and research applications.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

From Requirements to Architecture: Semi-Automatically Generating Software Architectures

To support junior and senior architects, I propose developing a new architecture creation method that leverages LLMs' evolving capabilities to support the architect. This method involves the architect's close collaboration with LLM-fueled tooling over the whole process. The architect is guided through Domain Model creation, Use Case specification, architectural decisions, and architecture evaluation. While the architect can take complete control of the process and the results, and use the tooling as a building set, they can follow the intended process for maximum tooling support. The preliminary results suggest the feasibility of this process and indicate major time savings for the architect.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

From Requirements to Architecture: An AI-Based Journey to Semi-Automatically Generate Software Architectures

Designing domain models and software architectures represents a significant challenge in software development, as the resulting architectures play a vital role in fulfilling the system's quality of service. Due to time pressure, architects often model only one architecture based on their known limited domain understanding, patterns, and experience instead of thoroughly analyzing the domain and evaluating multiple candidates, selecting the best fitting. Existing approaches try to generate domain models based on requirements, but still require time-consuming manual effort to achieve good results. Therefore, in this vision paper, we propose a method to generate software architecture candidates semi-automatically based on requirements using artificial intelligence techniques. We further envision an automatic evaluation and trade-off analysis of the generated architecture candidates using, e.g., the architecture trade-off analysis method combined with large language models and quantitative analyses. To evaluate this approach, we aim to analyze the quality of the generated architecture models and the efficiency and effectiveness of our proposed process by conducting qualitative studies.

cs.SE↗