Tim Scarr | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Estimating noise for airborne electromagnetic data from repeat flight lines or inversion residuals

Characterising the noise of an airborne electromagnetic (AEM) system is critical in correctly imaging the earth's subsurface conductivity. Deterministic and probabilistic geophysical inversion algorithms require foreknowledge of the system noise to specify stopping criteria or a valid model likelihood. Repeat flight lines provide a way for geophysicists to calculate the statistical variability in AEM data acquired over the same ground, and therefore estimate the levels of noise to propagate into the inversion. The total noise can be separated into multiplicative and additive components. The multiplicative noise is derived by repeat lines at survey altitude. The method to calculate the multiplicative noise is scarcely documented and usual methods for height correcting acquired data require a linear trend removal. This study will outline the algorithm used to estimate multiplicative noise of an AEM system, and non-linearly correct for varying altitudes during repeat flights. Additionally, this paper details a methodology to Gaussianise the data noise and provide a statistically valid Gaussian data misfit or likelihood function. Significantly, we provide methods for estimating the off-diagonal elements in the data covariance matrix used within the misfit function, taking into account the time-channel data correlation that is usually neglected. While our methodology is general, our study of a rotary-wing system leads us to conclude that for regularised time-domain AEM imaging, a diagonal data covariance suffices -- an important implication for rigorous yet practical AEM inversion.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

A decade of airborne electromagnetic surveying Lake Menindee (Australia) under varying water levels

Time domain airborne electromagnetic (AEM) surveying is a mature geophysical tool for imaging the Earth's shallow subsurface. It produces images of the electromagnetic conductivity structure of the earth, down to depths of a few hundred metres. The AEM method is fast, with aircraft acquiring data at speeds of 100-300 km/hr, making it an ideal near-surface reconnaissance tool. The physics of the AEM method are sensitive primarily to the subsurface conductivity, which is influenced by a range of geological factors such as mineral content, porosity, and water content and chemistry. In addition, the inferred subsurface conductivity depends on the accurate measurement and modelling of airborne transmitter and receiver geometries. In this work, we present inferences of the subsurface conductivity over Lake Menindee, New South Wales, Australia, using data from various AEM systems over the period 2014-2024. The lake storage has varied dramatically over this time and while this difference in storage volume undoubtedly influences the near surface conductivity, a remarkably consistent interpretation of the regional geology emerges. While the upper ten metres of the modelled depth sections exhibit the greatest time-variability in inferred electromagnetic conductivity, a correlation of lakebed near-surface conductivity with the lake water volume cannot robustly be established. We also provide information theoretic calculations for each inversion result to aid in their quantitative comparison. The implications of our study are that subtle, shallow, hydrogeological changes are difficult to image with repeat overflights. Conversely, we establish that different AEM systems robustly image the regional geo-electric structure of the near surface, validated by known stratigraphy and borehole conductivity logs.

physics.geo-ph↗