arXiv subjects

Tiffany Barnes

Publications and source records attributed to Tiffany Barnes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Will It Teach as Intended? How Teachers Configure Educational AI Chatbots

Teachers are increasingly using generative AI to support instruction, yet it remains unclear how pedagogical intentions are translated into chatbot configurations and reflected in chatbot behavior. We studied a teacher-facing chatbot authoring tool in professional development workshops with 27 middle school teachers, analyzing focus-group interviews alongside configuration and interaction logs. Teachers envisioned chatbots as instructional scaffolds that could provide differentiated support, extend access to assistance, and preserve student thinking within teacher-defined boundaries. Configuration analysis showed that Purpose primarily captured instructional goals and content focus, whereas Rules more often specified pedagogical behavior, guardrails, and learner-specific adaptations. Log-based evaluation showed stronger alignment for responsiveness (88.9%) and persona (81.5%) than for rules (70.4%) and purpose (59.3%). These findings show that configurable controls alone do not ensure pedagogical fidelity and highlight the need for authoring tools that help teachers express, test, and refine intended chatbot behavior.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

How Children Design and Reason about Trustworthy AI Chatbots

Children increasingly interact with AI chatbots, making trust calibration essential to AI literacy. Prior research has examined children's trust in AI mainly as users evaluating systems built by others, rather than as designers of their own chatbots. We developed a chatbot-building environment with adjustable trust-relevant traits (e.g., confidence, transparency, formality, assertiveness), rules, and persona. We conducted mixed-methods study with 115 learners (ages 8-18) who made 119 chatbots. We examined how children configured their chatbots, reasoned about trustworthiness, and how closely chatbot behavior aligned with their designs. Younger students (age 10-13) set significantly higher confidence than older students (age 14-18), and some deliberately built chatbots that gave wrong answers on purpose, yet still called them trustworthy, arguing that a chatbot does what it was built to do. Younger students equated trust with purpose-fulfillment, while older students linked it to transparent, calibrated design. Students also calibrated academic chatbots to be more transparent and formal than hobby chatbots. We identify seven design dimensions describing what children believe makes a chatbot trustworthy, and discuss implications for AI literacy tools.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

From Instructional Intent to Classroom-Ready Lessons: Investigating Teacher-AI Collaboration in Lesson Authoring for Secondary Computing Education

Generative AI is increasingly studied as a tool for supporting lesson authoring; the creation and adaptation of classroom materials, yet little is known about how it should fit into secondary computing teachers' subject-specific practices. We conducted two complementary qualitative studies with eight secondary computing teachers: focus groups examining existing authoring practices and a think-aloud study using LessonBuilder, a structured AI-supported lesson authoring system, as a research probe. We found that teachers' instructional intentions developed through creating, inspecting, and adapting materials, while teachers selectively delegated tasks to AI and retained responsibility for judging classroom readiness. The think-aloud sessions further showed how examining AI-generated materials prompted teachers to clarify and refine their intentions, making authoring an ongoing negotiation between what teachers intended and what the AI produced. In the context of computing lessons, classroom readiness also involved considering how programming materials and supporting guidance matched students' understanding and intended learning goals. We synthesize these findings into a conceptual model explaining how teachers coordinate instructional intent, AI assistance, and judgments of classroom readiness during lesson authoring. We derive design recommendations for supporting this coordination while preserving teacher control and addressing computing-specific authoring needs.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

If My Toy Could Talk: How Young Children Imagine, Design, and Test AI-Enabled Toys

To investigate the design space where children might design AI chatbots for their own toys, we developed ToyTalk, a technology probe that positions children as designers of LLM-enabled toys. Children begin with a familiar toy, configure its AI-enabled version through a no-code interface, and then interact with and test the character. We deployed ToyTalk with 76 children aged 7-9 across five elementary schools in the southeastern U.S. We examine how children define their toy, probe what it becomes, and respond when behavior diverges from expectations. Children predominantly designed toys with socially positive personalities, supportive roles, and interpersonal rules. In conversation, they most often probed identity and knowledge, while also testing capabilities, memory, and relationships. When mismatches arose, children typically responded through correction, persistence, and retesting, while few returned to reconfigure the system. We discuss implications for children's design agency, testing practices, and expectations of coherence in child-facing generative AI.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Adapting for AI: How elementary teachers adjust their practices for an AI-integrated curriculum

Conversational AI tools are entering children's everyday experiences, and schools are interested in adopting them. However, successful classroom integration depends not only on the technology but also on the work teachers do to make it usable and appropriate for their students and classroom context. There is little known about how elementary teachers work as they implement conversational AI tools in real classrooms. In this study, we examine three teachers' experiences implementing an AI literacy and English Language Arts (ELA) curriculum built around ToyTalk, a conversational AI toy development platform, over 13 instructional days, a three-week summer camp. Drawing on daily individual reflections, group reflections, and post-camp interviews, we find that teachers' adaptive practices of repair, differentiation, translation, and balancing sit at the intersection of three tensions (technology, learner, and instruction). Teachers' understanding of AI and their role evolved over the camp experiences. From these findings, we contribute design implications and considerations for deploying conversational AI within elementary classrooms.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Correct Diagnosis, Better Feedback: A Symbolic-Verifier for Faithful LLM Tutoring Feedback in Logic Proofs

Effective LLM tutoring depends on correctly identifying the specific error in a student's reasoning before generating feedback. We study this problem in propositional-logic proof tutoring, where student actions can be checked against formal inference rules. We introduce a verifier-grounded architecture that separates diagnosis from language generation. Using 600 balanced student actions, we compare a zero-shot LLM detector, a fine-tuned detector, and a symbolic verifier. Each diagnosis is processed by shared rationale and feedback agents, isolating the effect of the initial diagnosis. The zero-shot detector achieves a macro-F1 of 0.191; fine-tuning raises this to 0.709 but retains systematic errors between structurally related classes. Rationales generally preserve the diagnosis supplied to them, showing that an incorrect diagnosis can be faithfully propagated through the pipeline. Feedback can likewise remain faithful to its rationale, non-revealing, and pedagogically appropriate while addressing the wrong error. Verifier-grounded feedback achieves the highest diagnostic correctness, and expert ratings largely uneven with the automatic feedback evaluations. These findings show that apparent feedback quality can conceal upstream diagnostic errors and that faithfulness must be evaluated separately from correctness. Our code is publicly available

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Confirming Correct, Missing the Rest: LLM Tutoring Agents Struggle Where Feedback Matters Most

Effective tutoring requires distinguishing optimal, valid but suboptimal, and incorrect student solutions, a distinction central to intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) but untested for LLM-based tutors. As LLMs are increasingly explored as conversational complements to ITS, evaluating their diagnostic precision is essential. We present a benchmark of seven LLM feedback agents in propositional logic using knowledge-graph-derived ground truth across 10,836 solution--feedback pairs and three feedback conditions. Models achieved near-ceiling performance on optimal steps but systematically over-rejected valid but suboptimal reasoning and over-validated incorrect solutions, precisely where adaptive tutoring matters most. These failures persisted across models regardless of solution context, suggesting architectural rather than informational limits. Moreover, accurate diagnosis did not reliably produce pedagogically actionable feedback, revealing a gap between diagnostic judgment and instructional effectiveness. Our findings suggest that LLMs are better suited for hybrid architectures where KG-grounded models handle diagnosis while LLMs support open-ended scaffolding and dialogue.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Designing and Evaluating Next-Generation Learning Interfaces: Linking AI, HCI, and the Learning Sciences

This workshop addresses this gap by bringing together researchers and practitioners from AI, HCI, and the learning sciences to explore how interactive systems can better support learning. We focus on the design and evaluation of human-AI collaborative learning interfaces that are technically robust, human-centered, and pedagogically grounded. By fostering interdisciplinary dialogue, the workshop aims to identify shared challenges, design principles, and research directions for next-generation learning technologies.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Democratizing Foundations of Problem-Solving with AI: A Breadth-First Search Curriculum for Middle School Students

As AI becomes more common in students' everyday experiences, a major challenge for K-12 AI education is designing learning experiences that can be meaningfully integrated into existing subject-area instruction. This paper presents the design and implementation of an AI4K12-aligned curriculum that embeds AI learning goals within a rural middle school science classroom using Breadth-First Search (BFS) as an accessible entry point to AI problem-solving. Through unplugged activities and an interactive simulation environment, students learned BFS as a strategy for exploring networks and identifying shortest paths, then applied it to science contexts involving virus spread and contact tracing. To examine engagement and learning, we analyzed pre- and post-assessments, student work artifacts, and a teacher interview. Results suggest that students engaged productively with the curriculum, improved their understanding of BFS and AI problem-solving, and benefited from learning these ideas within ongoing science instruction. Teacher feedback further indicated that the module fit well within the science curriculum while supporting intended science learning outcomes. We conclude with curriculum and design considerations for broadening access to learning about problem-solving with AI in education.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

When Verification Hurts: Asymmetric Effects of Multi-Agent Feedback in Logic Proof Tutoring

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for automated tutoring, but their reliability in structured symbolic domains remains unclear. We study step-level feedback for propositional logic proofs, which require precise symbolic reasoning aligned with a learner's current proof state. We introduce a knowledge-graph-grounded benchmark of 516 unique proof states with step-level annotations and difficulty metrics. Unlike prior tutoring evaluations that rely on model self-assessment or binary correctness, our framework enables fine-grained analysis of feedback quality against verified solution paths. We evaluate three role-specialized pipelines with varying solution access: Tutor (partial solution access), Teacher (full derivation access), and Judge (verification of Tutor feedback). Our results reveal a striking asymmetry: verification improves outcomes when upstream feedback is error-prone (<70% accuracy), but degrades performance by 4-6 percentage points through over-specification when feedback is already reliable (>85%). Critically, we identify a shared complexity ceiling; no model or pipeline reliably succeeds on proof states exceeding complexity 4-5. These findings challenge the assumption that adding verifiers or richer context universally improves tutoring, motivating adaptive, difficulty-aware architectures that route problems by estimated complexity and upstream reliability.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

AI-Generated Rubric Interfaces: K-12 Teachers' Perceptions and Practices

This study investigates K--12 teachers' perceptions and experiences with AI-supported rubric generation during a summer professional development workshop ($n = 25$). Teachers used MagicSchool.ai to generate rubrics and practiced prompting to tailor criteria and performance levels. They then applied these rubrics to provide feedback on a sample block-based programming activity, followed by using a chatbot to deliver rubric-based feedback for the same work. Data were collected through pre- and post-workshop surveys, open discussions, and exit tickets. We used thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data. Teachers reported that they rarely create rubrics from scratch because the process is time-consuming and defining clear distinctions between performance levels is challenging. After hands-on use, teachers described AI-generated rubrics as strong starting drafts that improved structure and clarified vague criteria. However, they emphasized the need for teacher oversight due to generic or grade-misaligned language, occasional misalignment with instructional priorities, and the need for substantial editing. Survey results indicated high perceived clarity and ethical acceptability, moderate alignment with assignments, and usability as the primary weakness -- particularly the ability to add, remove, or revise criteria. Open-ended responses highlighted a ``strictness-versus-detail'' trade-off: AI feedback was often perceived as harsher but more detailed and scalable. As a result, teachers expressed conditional willingness to adopt AI rubric tools when workflows support easy customization and preserve teacher control.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Data-Driven Hints in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

This chapter explores the evolution of data-driven hint generation for intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). The Hint Factory and Interaction Networks have enabled the generation of next-step hints, waypoints, and strategic subgoals from historical student data. Data-driven techniques have also enabled systems to find the right time to provide hints. We explore further potential data-driven adaptations for problem solving based on behavioral problem solving data and the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs).

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Exploring Teacher-Chatbot Interaction and Affect in Block-Based Programming

AI-based chatbots have the potential to accelerate learning and teaching, but may also have counterproductive consequences without thoughtful design and scaffolding. To better understand teachers' perspectives on large language model (LLM)-based chatbots, we conducted a study with 11 teams of middle school teachers using chatbots for a science and computational thinking activity within a block-based programming environment. Based on a qualitative analysis of audio transcripts and chatbot interactions, we propose three profiles: explorer, frustrated, and mixed, that reflect diverse scaffolding needs. In their discussions, we found that teachers perceived chatbot benefits such as building prompting skills and self-confidence alongside risks including potential declines in learning and critical thinking. Key design recommendations include scaffolding the introduction to chatbots, facilitating teacher control of chatbot features, and suggesting when and how chatbots should be used. Our contribution informs the design of chatbots to support teachers and learners in middle school coding activities.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Exploring the Design and Impact of Interactive Worked Examples for Learners with Varying Prior Knowledge

Tutoring systems improve learning through tailored interventions, such as worked examples, but often suffer from the aptitude-treatment interaction effect where low prior knowledge learners benefit more. We applied the ICAP learning theory to design two new types of worked examples, Buggy (students fix bugs), and Guided (students complete missing rules), requiring varying levels of cognitive engagement, and investigated their impact on learning in a controlled experiment with 155 undergraduate students in a logic problem solving tutor. Students in the Buggy and Guided examples groups performed significantly better on the posttest than those receiving passive worked examples. Buggy problems helped high prior knowledge learners whereas Guided problems helped low prior knowledge learners. Behavior analysis showed that Buggy produced more exploration-revision cycles, while Guided led to more help-seeking and fewer errors. This research contributes to the design of interventions in logic problem solving for varied levels of learner knowledge and a novel application of behavior analysis to compare learner interactions with the tutor.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Enhancing Mathematical Problem Solving in LLMs through Execution-Driven Reasoning Augmentation

Mathematical problem solving is a fundamental benchmark for assessing the reasoning capabilities of artificial intelligence and a gateway to applications in education, science, and engineering where reliable symbolic reasoning is essential. Although recent advances in multi-agent LLM-based systems have enhanced their mathematical reasoning capabilities, they still lack a reliably revisable representation of the reasoning process. Existing agents either operate in rigid sequential pipelines that cannot correct earlier steps or rely on heuristic self-evaluation that can fail to identify and fix errors. In addition, programmatic context can distract language models and degrade accuracy. To address these gaps, we introduce Iteratively Improved Program Construction (IIPC), a reasoning method that iteratively refines programmatic reasoning chains and combines execution feedback with the native Chain-of-thought abilities of the base LLM to maintain high-level contextual focus. IIPC surpasses competing approaches in the majority of reasoning benchmarks on multiple base LLMs. All code and implementations are released as open source.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Adaptive Scaffolding for Cognitive Engagement in an Intelligent Tutoring System

The ICAP framework defines four cognitive engagement levels: Passive, Active, Constructive, and Interactive, where increased cognitive engagement can yield improved learning. However, personalizing learning activities that elicit the optimal level of cognitive engagement remains a key challenge in intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). In this work, we develop and evaluate a system that adaptively scaffolds cognitive engagement by dynamically selecting worked examples in two different ICAP modes: (active) Guided examples and (constructive) Buggy examples. We compare Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) as adaptive methods against a non-adaptive baseline method for selecting example type in a logic ITS. Our experiment with 113 students demonstrates that both adaptive policies significantly improved student performance on test problems. BKT yielded the largest improvement in posttest scores for low prior knowledge students, helping them catch up with their high prior knowledge peers, whereas DRL yielded significantly higher posttest scores among high prior knowledge students. This paper contributes new insights into the complex interactions of cognitive engagement and adaptivity and their results on learning outcomes.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

SafeTalkCoach: Diversity-Driven Multi-Agent Simulation for Parent-Teen Health Conversations

The importance of effective parent-child communication about sexual health is widely acknowledged, but real-world data on these conversations is scarce and challenging to collect, due to their private and sensitive nature. Although LLMs have been widely adopted in dialogue generation, they may deviate from best practices and frequently lack realism and diversity. We introduce SafeTalkCoach, a diversity-driven multi-agent dialogue generation framework that simulates parent-child conversations about sexual health, and present an accompanying dataset. SafeTalkCoach integrates crowd-sourced and synthesized scenarios, established sexual health guidelines, evidence-based personas, adaptive control modules, and hierarchical diversification. Through evaluations, we demonstrate that SafeTalkCoach generates diverse conversations while maintaining realism, communication quality, and controllability in practice. Our goal is that the SafeTalkCoach framework and the dataset support both AI research and health communications practices.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

SnapClass: An AI-Enhanced Classroom Management System for Block-Based Programming

Block-Based Programming (BBP) platforms, such as Snap!, have become increasingly prominent in K-12 computer science education due to their ability to simplify programming concepts and foster computational thinking from an early age. While these platforms engage students through visual and gamified interfaces, teachers often face challenges in using them effectively and finding all the necessary features for classroom management. To address these challenges, we introduce SnapClass, a classroom management system integrated within the Snap! programming environment. SnapClass was iteratively developed drawing on established research about the pedagogical and logistical challenges teachers encounter in computing classrooms. Specifically, SnapClass allows educators to create and customize block-based coding assignments based on student skill levels, implement rubric-based auto-grading, and access student code history and recovery features. It also supports monitoring student engagement and idle time, and includes a help dashboard with a raise hand feature to assist students in real time. This paper describes the design and key features of SnapClass those are developed and those are under progress.

cs.CY↗