arXiv subjects

Tianzhen Hong

Publications and source records attributed to Tianzhen Hong.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Selective Retrieval Routing for Multi-Violation Knowledge Graph Repair

Knowledge graphs often contain missing or inconsistent facts that undermine the applications built on them. Schema validation detects such violations but does not identify which of several valid repairs recovers the intended graph. External corpora can supply the evidence needed to identify the intended repair, but retrieving from them is costly and not always successful. We propose a framework for selective retrieval in iterative graph repair. An LLM repair agent explores and edits the graph, while a router controls its access to a researcher agent that retrieves external evidence. We extend a violation-injection framework to generate cases with multiple compatible violations and known reference repairs. The agent's repair outcomes on these cases provide supervision for training the deployment-specific router. On two building-automation datasets, researcher access improves repairs for some violations and degrades them for others, with effects differing across deployments. The router uses fewer repair-time tokens than always enabling access in all six evaluation suites. It achieves higher repair $F_1$ than always disabling access in five of six suites.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

A Formal Diagnostic Framework for Graph Repair Systems

Graph-based data representations excel at capturing relations among entities, e.g., for semantic web, artificial intelligence, or database applications, and their utility depends critically on their quality, usually enforced via graph schemas. These schemas are often violated, e.g., during data ingestion, calling for repair actions to achieve compliance. This paper presents a formal diagnostic framework for graph repair methods. Current methods often lack rigor and generality, since they rely on ad hoc test datasets. Our method starts, instead, from a compliant graph and uses an abstract rewriting system to systematically introduce schema violations while ensuring provable coverage of the constraints in the schema. We apply the framework to several repair methods, including those based on large language models, and assess their performance across multiple metrics. Results show that our framework effectively differentiates the performance of different methods across various constraints, highlighting the importance of fine-grained, systematic tools for graph repair.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

Large Language Models for HVAC Operations in Building Energy Systems: A Critical Review of Methods, Applications, and Deployment Readiness

Building automation systems generate rich sensor data yet remain insight-poor because heterogeneous point naming, missing metadata, and fragmented documentation obstruct their operational use. This systematic review analyses and codes 66 peer-reviewed studies on large language models (LLMs) for HVAC operations published between 2023 and March 2026. Each study is classified across five application families and three LLM method families and assessed for evidence realism, deployment readiness, and the responsibility boundary between the LLM and physical HVAC decisions. The corpus is concentrated in building energy modelling (BEM, 32 of 66 papers), while load forecasting remains too sparse for subfield-level conclusions. Only four studies reach pilot-level evidence, and none reports sustained operational deployment. No study was classified as ready-now for industry adoption; three were near-term and 63 research-only. Nevertheless, several bounded, human-in-the-loop uses merit near-term trials, including point-name normalisation, document-grounded operator support, BEM workflow assistance, and advisory interfaces around physics-based controllers. Conventional machine learning (ML), model predictive control (MPC), reinforcement learning (RL) and ontology-based tools remain more adopted for high-frequency control, short-horizon numerical forecasting, and well-posed ontology mapping, while autonomous agentic operation and unvalidated occupant proxies remain research-stage. Current evidence therefore supports LLMs primarily as semantic and workflow layers rather than autonomous HVAC controllers. Future work should prioritise field-validated benchmarks, orchestration evaluation under operational constraints, and LLM-MPC/RL architectures with bounded latency and verifiable safety properties.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

A Co-Simulation Platform Coupling Land Use, Transportation, and Building Energy: Development and Case Study

Land use, transportation, and building energy shape one another, yet urban-scale studies typically model each sector in isolation. We present a co-simulation platform that couples the UrbanSim land-use model, the POLARIS agent-based transportation model, and the CityBES urban building energy model into a single integrated workflow, with POLARIS travel skims driving land use and POLARIS agent activities driving dynamic building occupancy. We demonstrate the platform with forecasts through 2045 for the Chicago metropolitan area under a business-as-usual case, a high-telecommuting scenario, and a mileage-based user fee scenario. Both policies produced expected-direction responses that emerged from the model feedbacks rather than being imposed. Telecommuting decentralized activity toward outlying areas and cut 2045 vehicle miles traveled by 12.5%, whereas the mileage fee recentralized activity toward the urban core and cut it by 2.9%. Comparing coupled runs against uncoupled runs that hold land use fixed shows that the land-use feedback contributes over one percentage point to the county-level travel effect in several counties, large relative to the policy effect itself since the mileage fee's county-level effects are only about three percent, so a transportation-only study would materially misstate the sub-regional impact. Both policies raised citywide building energy by about 1%. This is the first platform to integrate land use, transportation, and building energy simultaneously, replacing predefined occupancy schedules and static building stocks with endogenous agent-based occupancy and a forecast-driven building stock. It lets planners evaluate transportation and pricing policies for their joint land use, travel, and energy consequences, and its component models rely on nationally available data, making the approach transferable given local building-stock and calibration data.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2025

Physics-informed machine learning for building performance simulation-A review of a nascent field

Building performance simulation (BPS) is critical for understanding building dynamics and behavior, analyzing performance of the built environment, optimizing energy efficiency, improving demand flexibility, and enhancing building resilience. However, conducting BPS is not trivial. Traditional BPS relies on an accurate building energy model, mostly physics-based, which depends heavily on detailed building information, expert knowledge, and case-by-case model calibrations, thereby significantly limiting their scalability. With the development of sensing technology and increased data availability, there is a growing attention and interest in data-driven BPS. However, purely data-driven models often suffer from limited generalization ability and a lack of physical consistency, resulting in poor performance in real-world applications. To address these limitations, recent studies have started to incorporate physics priors into data-driven models, a methodology called physics-informed machine learning (PIML). PIML is an emerging field with the definitions, methodologies, evaluation criteria, application scenarios, and future directions that remain open. To bridge those gaps, this study systematically reviews the state-of-art PIML for BPS, offering a comprehensive definition of PIML, and comparing it to traditional BPS approaches regarding data requirements, modeling effort, performance and computation cost. We also summarize the commonly used methodologies, validation approaches, application domains, available data sources, open-source packages and testbeds. In addition, this study provides a general guideline for selecting appropriate PIML models based on BPS applications. Finally, this study identifies key challenges and outlines future research directions, providing a solid foundation and valuable insights to advance R&D of PIML in BPS.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2024

CityLearn v2: Energy-flexible, resilient, occupant-centric, and carbon-aware management of grid-interactive communities

As more distributed energy resources become part of the demand-side infrastructure, it is important to quantify the energy flexibility they provide on a community scale, particularly to understand the impact of geographic, climatic, and occupant behavioral differences on their effectiveness, as well as identify the best control strategies to accelerate their real-world adoption. CityLearn provides an environment for benchmarking simple and advanced distributed energy resource control algorithms including rule-based, model-predictive, and reinforcement learning control. CityLearn v2 presented here extends CityLearn v1 by providing a simulation environment that leverages the End-Use Load Profiles for the U.S. Building Stock dataset to create virtual grid-interactive communities for resilient, multi-agent distributed energy resources and objective control with dynamic occupant feedback. This work details the v2 environment design and provides application examples that utilize reinforcement learning to manage battery energy storage system charging/discharging cycles, vehicle-to-grid control, and thermal comfort during heat pump power modulation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) Tools: A State-of-the-Art Review of bottom-up physics-based approaches

Regulations corroborate the importance of retrofitting existing building stocks or constructing new energy efficient district. There is, thus, a need for modeling tools to evaluate energy scenarios to better manage and design cities, and numerous methodologies and tools have been developed. Among them, Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) tools allow the energy simulation of buildings at large scales. Choosing an appropriate UBEM tool, balancing the level of complexity, accuracy, usability, and computing needs, remains a challenge for users. The review focuses on the main bottom-up physics-based UBEM tools, comparing them from a user-oriented perspective. Five categories are used: (i) the required inputs, (ii) the reported outputs, (iii) the exploited workflow, (iv) the applicability of each tool, and (v) the potential users. Moreover, a critical discussion is proposed focusing on interests and trends in research and development. The results highlighted major differences between UBEM tools that must be considered to choose the proper one for an application. Barriers of adoption of UBEM tools include the needs of a standardized ontology, a common three dimensional city model, a standard procedure to collect data, and a standard set of test cases. This feeds into future development of UBEM tools to support cities' sustainability goals.

cs.CY↗