Identifying the Group to Intervene on to Maximize Effect Under Cross-Group Interference
In many networked systems, interventions applied to one group of units can induce substantial causal effects on another group through cross-group interference pathways. Despite its practical importance in domains such as public health, digital marketing, and social policy, the problem of identifying which intervention subset in a source group maximizes the benefit on a target group remains largely unaddressed. We formalize this problem as cross-group causal influence estimation and introduce the core-to-group causal effect (Co2G), a formally defined causal estimand that quantifies the contrast in target-group outcomes under intervention versus non-intervention on a candidate source subset. We establish the nonparametric identifiability of Co2G from observational network data using do-calculus under standard causal assumptions, and develop a graph neural network-based estimator that captures cross-group interference patterns. To navigate the combinatorial search space of candidate subsets, we propose CauMax, an uncertainty-aware causal effect maximization framework with two scalable selection algorithms: (i) CauMax-G, an iterative greedy search with Monte Carlo dropout-based lower confidence bounds, and (ii) CauMax-D, a differentiable gradient-based optimization via a concrete Gumbel-Softmax relaxation. Extensive experiments on semi-synthetic data over two real-world social-network topologies, complemented by a real-outcome validation on three additional networks, show that CauMax substantially reduces regret relative to structural and diffusion-based heuristics, by up to an order of magnitude at small budgets and consistently across all budgets, while remaining robust to the uncertainty-penalty weight.