arXiv subjects

Thomas Tian

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Tian.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Should the Action Expert Train the VLM? Action-Token Supervision and Gradient Routing in Mixture-of-Transformer VLAs

Vision-language-action (VLA) models increasingly pair a pre-trained vision-language model (VLM) with a flow-matching expert that conditions its action predictions on the VLM's key-value representations. Those representations must carry information useful for control, yet the VLM was never trained for the action expert's flow-matching objective. Two signals can address this: gradients backpropagated from the expert's loss (coupling), or VLM supervision to predict discrete tokens encoding the same target actions. Prominent training recipes forgo the first, blocking expert-to-VLM gradients (insulation) to protect the VLM's existing capabilities, while also supervising it on vision-language data and action tokens. Because vision-language co-training also aims to preserve those capabilities, the additional protection provided by insulation is unclear. At the same time, insulation removes a direct signal about which features continuous action prediction requires. On the other hand, action-token supervision offers an alternative way to learn action-relevant representations, which may explain why insulation succeeds in practice. We disentangle these factors in autonomous driving and manipulation by independently varying action-token supervision and whether the expert's loss updates the VLM. In open-loop driving, insulation is competitive with coupling when action tokens are supervised; without them, coupling reduces trajectory-prediction error by roughly 25%. When both components are trained jointly from the outset, coupling increases closed-loop driving route progress by approximately 17% with action-token supervision and 40% without it, and similarly improves robot manipulation performance under both settings. These findings show that the value of gradient insulation depends on the VLM's action supervision and the evaluation setting, challenging insulation as a default VLA training recipe.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

TacitVLA: Reasoning Vision-Language-Action Models Without Reasoning Latency

Textual reasoning before acting has improved vision-language-action (VLA) models, but at the cost of latency: every action conditioned on the reasoning text must wait for autoregressive decoding. We show that actions do not need to wait for or condition on the generated reasoning to benefit from it, because the reasoning supervision already improves the backbone representation. We introduce TacitVLA, a reasoning VLA whose action expert never attends to the reasoning it generates for the current call. On long-horizon tasks where the reasoning text also serves as episodic memory, it can generate each entry during action execution rather than before acting. We evaluate it in a controlled study on four benchmarks spanning manipulation and autonomous driving, memory and non-memory tasks: RoboMME, RMBench, LIBERO, and PhysicalAI-AV. On all four, TacitVLA matches the performance of its explicit-reasoning counterpart at up to 3.4x lower latency, and matches the latency of the same architecture trained without reasoning at up to +17.1% success. In absolute terms, it surpasses the best previously published results on the RoboMME Counting suite (82.7% vs. 66.8%) and RMBench (77.5% vs. 56.5%), and reaches 72.9% on LIBERO-Plus and a 52.5% scene score on the public split of the PhysicalAI-AV closed-loop driving challenge. Project page: https://tacitvla.github.io.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

VeriFine: Scaling Verification for Self-Improvement in Embodied Reasoning

Self-improving policies continually expose new failure patterns, changing what their judges must be able to verify. However, current fixed judges constrain both optimization feedback and the discovery of useful training examples, limiting further self-improvement. This challenge is even more acute in embodied reasoning, where reliable evaluation must account for spatial grounding, causal reasoning, and safety-aware decision-making. We introduce VeriFine, an agent harness framework that scales verification through the co-evolution of the policy, training curriculum, and judge. The Policy Improvement Loop uses a rubric judge to diagnose recurring failures, construct an adaptive curriculum, and optimize the policy. When progress plateaus and verification becomes a bottleneck, the Judge Improvement Loop selectively queries human guidance on informative failure cases and refines the judge through coactive calibration, in which humans and agents resolve disagreements and converge toward the objective rubric of physical reasoning. The revised judge then guides the next stage of data selection and policy optimization. Experiments on driving and robot navigation tasks demonstrate continuous self-improvement in both policy and judge capability across reinforcement and supervised fine-tuning. These results show how scaling verification supports continuous self-improvement as policy failure patterns evolve.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CLIFT: Turning Gemini Robotics On-Device into Humanoid Specialists via Non-Invasive Closed-Loop Iterative Fine-Tuning

While robot foundation models are growing increasingly capable, the strongest models are typically trained on proprietary data and remain closed-source, limiting downstream users' ability to adapt them to new tasks, embodiments, and deployment settings. Following the LLM community, an emerging access paradigm for closed-weight robot foundation models is the managed supervised fine-tuning (SFT) API, where users submit training data and receive a tuned policy without access to model weights, gradients, or training internals. While such APIs let downstream users leverage powerful proprietary foundation models, they restrict policy improvement to pure imitation, ruling out reinforcement learning and other closed-loop methods that rely on internal training signals. This limitation is particularly acute for agile, contact-rich humanoid manipulation, where the gap between policy outputs and deployed behavior is large due to novel states, action tracking dynamics, latency, and controller-specific failure modes. We study how effective this managed-API regime is for humanoid adaptation, and how closed-loop improvement can be realized within it to push policies toward task mastery. We conduct one of the first empirical studies of managed-API adaptation on a real humanoid, instantiated on Gemini Robotics On-Device (GROD). We find that direct SFT through the API substantially outperforms a leading open-weight VLA trained on the same demonstrations, yet still falls short of deployment-level mastery on agile, contact-rich tasks. To close this gap, we introduce CLIFT: Closed-Loop Iterative Fine-Tuning, which turns deployment-time reward feedback into API-compatible supervised data and enables closed-loop policy improvement without accessing weights, gradients, likelihoods, or losses-pushing GROD to near-perfect success after two flywheel cycles, all without "opening the model box."

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

TEXEDO : Test Time Scaling for Controller-aware Language-conditioned Humanoid Motion Generation

Text-conditioned motion generation is a promising interface for programming humanoid robots, yet current generators are often trained on human motion datasets retargeted to robot morphologies. Although such data provides rich semantic and kinematic priors, it fails to capture the nuances of whole-body tracking controllers, including balance, contact dynamics, actuation limits, and controller-specific failure modes. As a result, generated motions can be semantically plausible but difficult or impossible for the robot to execute. We introduce TEXEDO, a test-time scaling framework for humanoid motion generation that improves motion quality without requiring a stronger underlying generator. Given a text prompt, TEXEDO samples multiple candidate motions from a pretrained text-conditioned generator and selects the best motion that is both executable and task-aligned. The reward model combines a dynamic feasibility verifier, distilled from whole-body tracking rollouts to predict physical executability, with a semantic alignment verifier that measures text-motion alignment in a learned co-embedding space. Our pipeline treats dynamic feasibility as a hard constraint and semantic alignment as the selection objective within the feasible set. Through large-scale simulation studies and real-world deployment on a Unitree G1 humanoid robot, we show that TEXEDO consistently improves both tracking fidelity and text alignment. These results demonstrate that grounded verification is an effective path toward deployable language-guided humanoid motion generation. Project website: https://jianuocao.github.io/TEXEDO/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Counterfactual VLA: Self-Reflective Vision-Language-Action Model with Adaptive Reasoning

Recent reasoning-augmented Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have improved the interpretability of end-to-end autonomous driving by generating intermediate reasoning traces. Yet these models primarily describe what they perceive and intend to do, rarely questioning whether their planned actions are safe or appropriate. This work introduces Counterfactual VLA (CF-VLA), a self-reflective VLA framework that enables the model to reason about and revise its planned actions before execution. CF-VLA first generates time-segmented meta-actions that summarize driving intent, and then performs counterfactual reasoning conditioned on both the meta-actions and the visual context. This step simulates potential outcomes, identifies unsafe behaviors, and outputs corrected meta-actions that guide the final trajectory generation. To efficiently obtain such self-reflective capabilities, we propose a rollout-filter-label pipeline that mines high-value scenes from a base (non-counterfactual) VLA's rollouts and labels counterfactual reasoning traces for subsequent training rounds. Experiments on large-scale driving datasets show that CF-VLA improves trajectory accuracy by up to 17.6%, enhances safety metrics by 20.5%, and exhibits adaptive thinking: it only enables counterfactual reasoning in challenging scenarios. By transforming reasoning traces from one-shot descriptions to causal self-correction signals, CF-VLA takes a step toward self-reflective autonomous driving agents that learn to think before they act.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

Human-oriented Representation Learning for Robotic Manipulation

Humans inherently possess generalizable visual representations that empower them to efficiently explore and interact with the environments in manipulation tasks. We advocate that such a representation automatically arises from simultaneously learning about multiple simple perceptual skills that are critical for everyday scenarios (e.g., hand detection, state estimate, etc.) and is better suited for learning robot manipulation policies compared to current state-of-the-art visual representations purely based on self-supervised objectives. We formalize this idea through the lens of human-oriented multi-task fine-tuning on top of pre-trained visual encoders, where each task is a perceptual skill tied to human-environment interactions. We introduce Task Fusion Decoder as a plug-and-play embedding translator that utilizes the underlying relationships among these perceptual skills to guide the representation learning towards encoding meaningful structure for what's important for all perceptual skills, ultimately empowering learning of downstream robotic manipulation tasks. Extensive experiments across a range of robotic tasks and embodiments, in both simulations and real-world environments, show that our Task Fusion Decoder consistently improves the representation of three state-of-the-art visual encoders including R3M, MVP, and EgoVLP, for downstream manipulation policy-learning. Project page: https://sites.google.com/view/human-oriented-robot-learning

cs.RO↗