arXiv subjects

Thomas Place

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Place.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Navigational hierarchies of regular languages

We study the class of star-free languages. A long-standing goal is to classify them by the complexity of their descriptions. The most influential research effort involves concatenation hierarchies, which measure alternations between ``complement'' and ``union plus concatenation''. We explore alternative hierarchies that also stratify star-free languages. They are built with an operator $C\mapsto TL(C)$. From an input class $C$, it produces a larger one $TL(C)$, consisting of all languages definable in a variant of unary temporal logic, where temporal modalities depend on $C$. Level $n$ in the navigational hierarchy of basis $C$ is constructed by applying this operator $n$ times to $C$. As bases $G$, we focus on group languages and natural extensions thereof, denoted $G^+$. We prove that the navigational hierarchies of bases $G$ and $G^+$ are strictly intertwined and conduct a thorough investigation of their relationships with concatenation hierarchies. We also look at two problems on classes of languages: membership (decide if a language is in the class) and separation (decide, for two languages $L_1,L_2$, if there is a language $K$ in the class with $L_1\subseteq K$ and $L_2\cap K=\emptyset$). We prove that if separation is decidable for $G$, then so is membership for level \emph{two} in the navigational hierarchies of bases $G$ and $G^+$. We take a look at the trivial class $ST=\{\emptyset,A^*\}$. For the bases $ST$ and $ST^+$, the levels \emph{one} are standard variants of unary temporal logic. The levels \emph{two} correspond to variants of two-variable logic, investigated recently by Krebs, Lodaya, Pandya and Straubing. We solve one of their conjectures. We also prove that for these two bases, level \emph{two} has decidable \emph{separation}. Combined with earlier results on the operator $C\mapsto TL(C)$, this implies that level \emph{three} has decidable membership.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2024

Dot-depth three, return of the J-class

We look at concatenation hierarchies of classes of regular languages. Each such hierarchy is determined by a single class, its basis: level $n$ is built by applying the Boolean polynomial closure operator (BPol), $n$ times to the basis. A prominent and difficult open question in automata theory is to decide membership of a regular language in a given level. For instance, for the historical dot-depth hierarchy, the decidability of membership is only known at levels one and two. We give a generic algebraic characterization of the operator BPol. This characterization implies that for any concatenation hierarchy, if $n$ is at least two, membership at level $n$ reduces to a more complex problem, called covering, for the previous level, $n-1$. Combined with earlier results on covering, this implies that membership is decidable for dot-depth three and for level two in most of the prominent hierarchies in the literature. For instance, we obtain that the levels two in both the modulo hierarchy and the group hierarchy have decidable membership.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2023

A generic characterization of generalized unary temporal logic and two-variable first-order logic

We investigate an operator on classes of languages. For each class $C$, it outputs a new class $FO^2(I_C)$ associated with a variant of two-variable first-order logic equipped with a signature$I_C$ built from $C$. For $C = \{\emptyset, A^*\}$, we get the variant $FO^2(<)$ equipped with the linear order. For $C = \{\emptyset, \{\varepsilon\},A^+, A^*\}$, we get the variant $FO^2(<,+1)$, which also includes the successor. If $C$ consists of all Boolean combinations of languages $A^*aA^*$ where $a$ is a letter, we get the variant $FO^2(<,Bet)$, which also includes "between relations". We prove a generic algebraic characterization of the classes $FO^2(I_C)$. It smoothly and elegantly generalizes the known ones for all aforementioned cases. Moreover, it implies that if $C$ has decidable separation (plus mild properties), then $FO^2(I_C)$ has a decidable membership problem. We actually work with an equivalent definition of \fodc in terms of unary temporal logic. For each class $C$, we consider a variant $TL(C)$ of unary temporal logic whose future/past modalities depend on $C$ and such that $TL(C) = FO^2(I_C)$. Finally, we also characterize $FL(C)$ and $PL(C)$, the pure-future and pure-past restrictions of $TL(C)$. These characterizations as well imply that if \Cs is a class with decidable separation, then $FL(C)$ and $PL(C)$ have decidable membership.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2023

Closing star-free closure

We introduce an operator on classes of regular languages, the star-free closure. Our motivation is to generalize standard results of automata theory within a unified framework. Given an arbitrary input class $C$, the star-free closure operator outputs the least class closed under Boolean operations and language concatenation, and containing all languages of $C$ as well as all finite languages. We establish several equivalent characterizations of star-free closure: in terms of regular expressions, first-order logic, pure future and future-past temporal logic, and recognition by finite monoids. A key ingredient is that star-free closure coincides with another closure operator, defined in terms of regular operations where Kleene stars are allowed in restricted~contexts. A consequence of this first result is that we can decide membership of a regular language in the star-free closure of a class whose separation problem is decidable. Moreover, we prove that separation itself is decidable for the star-free closure of any finite class, and of any class of group languages having itself decidable separation (plus mild additional properties). We actually show decidability of a stronger property, called covering.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

A generic polynomial time approach to separation by first-order logic without quantifier alternation

We look at classes of languages associated to the fragment of first-order logic B{\Sigma}1 which disallows quantifier alternations. Each class is defined by choosing the set of predicates on positions that may be used. Two key such fragments are those equipped with the linear ordering and possibly the successor relation. It is known that these two variants have decidable membership: "does an input regular language belong to the class ?". We rely on a characterization of B{\Sigma}1 by the operator BPol: given an input class C, it outputs a class BPol(C) that corresponds to a variant of B{\Sigma}1 equipped with special predicates associated to C. We extend these results in two orthogonal directions. First, we use two kinds of inputs: classes G of group languages (i.e., recognized by a DFA in which each letter induces a permutation of the states) and extensions thereof, written G+. The classes BPol(G) and BPol(G+) capture many variants of B{\Sigma}1 which use predicates such as the linear ordering, the successor, the modular predicates or the alphabetic modular predicates. Second, instead of membership, we explore the more general separation problem: decide if two regular languages can be separated by a language from the class under study. We show it is decidable for BPol(G) and BPol(G+) when this is the case for G. This was known for BPol(G) and for two particular classes BPol(G+). Yet, the algorithms were indirect and relied on involved frameworks, yielding poor upper complexity bounds. Our approach is direct. We work with elementary concepts (mainly, finite automata). Our main contribution consists in polynomial time Turing reductions from both BPol(G)- and BPol(G+)-separation to G-separation. This yields polynomial algorithms for key variants of B{\Sigma}1, including those equipped with the linear ordering and possibly the successor and/or the modular predicates.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

All about unambiguous polynomial closure

We study a standard operator on classes of languages: unambiguous polynomial closure. We prove that for every class C of regular languages satisfying mild properties, the membership problem for its unambiguous polynomial closure UPol(C) reduces to the same problem for C. We also show that unambiguous polynomial closure coincides with alternating left and right deterministic closure. Moreover, we prove that if additionally C is finite, the separation and covering problems are decidable for UPol(C). Finally, we present an overview of the generic logical characterizations of the classes built using unambiguous polynomial closure.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Group separation strikes back

Group languages are regular languages recognized by finite groups, or equivalently by finite automata in which each letter induces a permutation on the set of states. We investigate the separation problem for this class of languages: given two arbitrary regular languages as input, we show how to decide if there exists a group language containing the first one while being disjoint from the second. We prove that covering, a problem generalizing separation, is decidable. A simple covering algorithm was already known: it can be obtained indirectly as a corollary of an algebraic theorem by Ash. Unfortunately, while deducing the algorithm from this algebraic result is straightforward, all proofs of Ash's result itself require a strong background on algebraic concepts, and a wealth of technical machinery outside of automata theory. Our proof is independent of previous ones. It relies exclusively on standard notions from automata theory: we directly deal with separation and work with input languages represented by nondeterministic finite automata. We also investigate two strict subclasses. First, the alphabet modulo testable languages are those defined by counting the occurrences of each letter modulo some fixed integer (equivalently, they are the languages recognized by a commutative group). Secondly, the modulo languages are those defined by counting the length of words modulo some fixed integer. We prove that covering is decidable for both classes, with algorithms that rely on the construction made for group languages. Our proofs lead to tight complexity bounds for separation for all three classes, as well as for covering for both alphabet modulo testable languages and for modulo testable languages.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

The amazing mixed polynomial closure and its applications to two-variable first-order logic

Polynomial closure is a standard operator which is applied to a class of regular languages. In the paper, we investigate three restrictions called left (LPol), right (RPol) and mixed polynomial closure (MPol). The first two were known while MPol is new. We look at two decision problems that are defined for every class C. Membership takes a regular language as input and asks if it belongs to C. Separation takes two regular languages as input and asks if there exists a third language in C including the first one and disjoint from the second. We prove that LPol, RPol and MPol preserve the decidability of membership under mild hypotheses on the input class, and the decidability of separation under much stronger hypotheses. We apply these results to natural hierarchies. First, we look at several language theoretic hierarchies that are built by applying LPol, RPol and MPol recursively to a single input class. We prove that these hierarchies can actually be defined using almost exclusively MPol. We also consider quantifier alternation hierarchies for two-variable first-order logic and prove that one can climb them using MPol. The result is generic in the sense that it holds for most standard choices of signatures. We use it to prove that for most of these choices, membership is decidable for all levels in the hierarchy. Finally, we prove that separation is decidable for the hierarchy of two-variable first-order logic equipped with only the linear order.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Characterizing level one in group-based concatenation hierarchies

We investigate two operators on classes of regular languages: polynomial closure (Pol) and Boolean closure (Bool). We apply these operators to classes of group languages G and to their well-suited extensions G+, which is the least Boolean algebra containing G and the singleton language containing the empty word. This yields the classes Bool(Pol(G)) and Bool(Pol(G+)). These classes form the first level in important classifications of classes of regular languages, called concatenation hierarchies, which admit natural logical characterizations. We present generic algebraic characterizations of these classes. They imply that one may decide whether a regular language belongs to such a class, provided that a more general problem called separation is decidable for the input class G. The proofs are constructive and rely exclusively on notions from language and automata theory.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

On all things star-free

We investigate the star-free closure, which associates to a class of languages its closure under Boolean operations and marked concatenation. We prove that the star-free closure of any finite class and of any class of groups languages with decidable separation (plus mild additional properties) has decidable separation. We actually show decidability of a stronger property, called covering. This generalizes many results on the subject in a unified framework. A key ingredient is that star-free closure coincides with another closure operator where Kleene stars are also allowed in restricted contexts.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

Separation and covering for group based concatenation hierarchies

Concatenation hierarchies are classifications of regular languages. All such hierarchies are built through the same construction process: start from an initial class of languages and build new levels using two generic operations. Concatenation hierarchies have gathered a lot of interest since the 70s, thanks to an alternate logical definition: each concatenation hierarchy is the quantification alternation hierarchy within a variant of first-order logic over words. Our goal is to understand such hierarchies. We look at two decision problems: membership and separation. For a class of languages C, C-separation takes two regular languages as input and asks whether there exists a third one in C including the first one and disjoint from the second one. Settling whether separation is decidable for the levels within a given concatenation hierarchy is among the most fundamental and challenging questions in formal language theory. In all prominent cases, it is open, or answered positively for low levels only. Recently, a breakthrough was made using a generic approach for a specific kind of hierarchy: those with a finite basis. In this case, separation is always decidable for levels 1/2, 1 and 3/2. Our main theorem is similar but independent: we consider hierarchies with possibly infinite bases, but that may only contain group languages. An example is the quantifier alternation hierarchy of first-order logic with modular predicates: its basis consists of languages counting the length of words modulo some number. Using a generic approach, we show that for any such hierarchy, if separation is decidable for the basis, then it is decidable for levels up to 3/2. This complements the aforementioned result nicely: all bases considered in the literature are either finite or made of group languages. Thus, one may handle the lower levels of any prominent hierarchy in a generic way.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

Separation for dot-depth two

The dot-depth hierarchy of Brzozowski and Cohen classifies the star-free languages of finite words. By a theorem of McNaughton and Papert, these are also the first-order definable languages. The dot-depth rose to prominence following the work of Thomas, who proved an exact correspondence with the quantifier alternation hierarchy of first-order logic: each level in the dot-depth hierarchy consists of all languages that can be defined with a prescribed number of quantifier blocks. One of the most famous open problems in automata theory is to settle whether the membership problem is decidable for each level: is it possible to decide whether an input regular language belongs to this level? Despite a significant research effort, membership by itself has only been solved for low levels. A recent breakthrough was achieved by replacing membership with a more general problem: separation. Given two input languages, one has to decide whether there exists a third language in the investigated level containing the first language and disjoint from the second. The motivation is that: (1) while more difficult, separation is more rewarding (2) it provides a more convenient framework (3) all recent membership algorithms are reductions to separation for lower levels. We present a separation algorithm for dot-depth two. While this is our most prominent application, our result is more general. We consider a family of hierarchies that includes the dot-depth: concatenation hierarchies. They are built via a generic construction process. One first chooses an initial class, the basis, which is the lowest level in the hierarchy. Further levels are built by applying generic operations. Our main theorem states that for any concatenation hierarchy whose basis is finite, separation is decidable for level one. In the special case of the dot-depth, this can be lifted to level two using previously known results.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2018

The complexity of separation for levels in concatenation hierarchies

We investigate the complexity of the separation problem associated to classes of regular languages. For a class C, C-separation takes two regular languages as input and asks whether there exists a third language in C which includes the first and is disjoint from the second. First, in contrast with the situation for the classical membership problem, we prove that for most classes C, the complexity of C-separation does not depend on how the input languages are represented: it is the same for nondeterministic finite automata and monoid morphisms. Then, we investigate specific classes belonging to finitely based concatenation hierarchies. It was recently proved that the problem is always decidable for levels 1/2 and 1 of any such hierarchy (with inefficient algorithms). Here, we build on these results to show that when the alphabet is fixed, there are polynomial time algorithms for both levels. Finally, we investigate levels 3/2 and 2 of the famous Straubing-Th\'erien hierarchy. We show that separation is PSPACE-complete for level 3/2 and between PSPACE-hard and EXPTIME for level 2.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2018

Regular tree languages in low levels of the Wadge Hierarchy

In this article we provide effective characterisations of regular languages of infinite trees that belong to the low levels of the Wadge hierarchy. More precisely we prove decidability for each of the finite levels of the hierarchy; for the class of the Boolean combinations of open sets $BC(\Sigma_1^0)$ (i.e. the union of the first $\omega$ levels); and for the Borel class $\Delta_2^0$ (i.e. for the union of the first $\omega_1$ levels).

cs.FL↗

arXiv2018

Covering and separation for logical fragments with modular predicates

For every class $\mathscr{C}$ of word languages, one may associate a decision problem called $\mathscr{C}$-separation. Given two regular languages, it asks whether there exists a third language in $\mathscr{C}$ containing the first language, while being disjoint from the second one. Usually, finding an algorithm deciding $\mathscr{C}$-separation yields a deep insight on $\mathscr{C}$. We consider classes defined by fragments of first-order logic. Given such a fragment, one may often build a larger class by adding more predicates to its signature. In the paper, we investigate the operation of enriching signatures with modular predicates. Our main theorem is a generic transfer result for this construction. Informally, we show that when a logical fragment is equipped with a signature containing the successor predicate, separation for the stronger logic enriched with modular predicates reduces to separation for the original logic. This result actually applies to a more general decision problem, called the covering problem.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

A generic characterization of Pol(C)

We investigate the polynomial closure operation (C -> Pol(C)) defined on classes of regular languages. We present an interesting and useful connection relating the separation problem for the class C and the membership problem for it polynomial closure Pol(C). This connection is formulated as an algebraic characterization of Pol(C) which holds when C is an arbitrary \pvari of regular languages and whose statement is parameterized by C-separation. Its main application is an effective reduction from Pol(C)-membership to C-separation. Thus, as soon as one designs a C-separation algorithm, this yields "for free" a membership algorithm for the more complex class Pol(C).

cs.FL↗

arXiv2017

Generic Results for Concatenation Hierarchies

In the theory of formal languages, the understanding of concatenation hierarchies of regular languages is one of the most fundamental and challenging topic. In this paper, we survey progress made in the comprehension of this problem since 1971, and we establish new generic statements regarding this problem.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2017

Adding successor: A transfer theorem for separation and covering

Given a class C of word languages, the C-separation problem asks for an algorithm that, given as input two regular languages, decides whether there exists a third language in C containing the first language, while being disjoint from the second. Separation is usually investigated as a means to obtain a deep understanding of the class C. In the paper, we are mainly interested in classes defined by logical formalisms. Such classes are often built on top of each other: given some logic, one builds a stronger one by adding new predicates to its signature. A natural construction is to enrich a logic with the successor relation. In this paper, we present a transfer result applying to this construction: we show that for suitable logically defined classes, separation for the logic enriched with the successor relation reduces to separation for the original logic. Our theorem also applies to a problem that is stronger than separation: covering. Moreover, we actually present two reductions: one for languages of finite words and the other for languages of infinite words.

cs.FL↗