arXiv subjects

Thomas Moerland

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Moerland.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

GEM-MPC: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Expert-Guided Planning

Effective exploration in high-dimensional continuous control remains a central challenge in reinforcement learning. Planning-based methods address this by combining online planning with learned policies and value functions, but their components can become misaligned during training: learned sampling policies may diverge from planner behavior, while planning distributions stored in replay become stale as the model and value function evolve. Reanalysis can refresh these targets, but at substantial computational cost. We propose GEM-MPC, an MPPI-based reinforcement learning method that improves the interaction between planning and learning. GEM-MPC uses MPPI to combine a policy trained to clone the planner with a KL-regularized policy that explores around it, providing complementary exploitation and guided exploration within planning. We further introduce Gated Prior Distillation, which selectively learns from stored planning distributions only when they provide a better target than the current prior, reducing the impact of stale planning data without requiring full reanalysis. Across continuous-control benchmarks, GEM-MPC consistently outperforms existing planning-based baselines under lower computational budgets.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Evaluation Metrics for Safe Reinforcement Learning

Safe reinforcement learning (RL) is commonly formalized as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP), in which an agent maximizes expected reward while keeping its expected cumulative cost below a specified safety bound. Existing safe RL benchmarks predominantly report whether an algorithm is safe on average, following this expectation-based guarantee. We argue that this convention is insufficient to reliably characterize an algorithm's true safety: it fails to capture how often and how severely the safety bound is violated, whether this holds consistently across tasks and safety bounds, and whether training-time behavior is representative of behavior of the final converged policy. Therefore, we introduce (i) evaluation metrics for safe RL that address each of these concerns and in addition allow for aggregation across tasks and safety bounds. We furthermore define (ii) a safety tier system to systematically categorize and compare algorithms in terms of safety and reliability at both training and for a final policy. Using this framework, we provide (iii) an empirical safety evaluation across multiple safety navigation tasks. Our results show that aggregate metrics, distributional reporting, and task- and safety bound-specific results each reveal information the other metrics cannot. We therefore recommend reporting all three jointly, rather than compressing this information into a single value, as is common practice. We provide SafeRLEval, an open-source evaluation suite to support the reliable characterization of safety in future safe RL research.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Reinforcement learning for Quantum Tiq-Taq-Toe

Quantum Tiq-Taq-Toe is a well-known benchmark and playground for both quantum computing and machine learning. Despite its popularity, no reinforcement learning (RL) methods have been applied to Quantum Tiq-Taq-Toe. Although there has been some research on Quantum Chess this game is significantly more complex in terms of computation and analysis. Therefore, we study the combination of quantum computing and reinforcement learning in Quantum Tiq-Taq-Toe, which may serve as an accessible testbed for the integration of both fields. Quantum games are challenging to represent classically due to their inherent partial observability and the potential for exponential state complexity. In Quantum Tiq-Taq-Toe, states are observed through Measurement (a 3x3 matrix of state probabilities) and Move History (a 9x9 matrix of entanglement relations), making strategy complex as each move can collapse the quantum state.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

A KL-regularization Framework for Learning to Plan with Adaptive Priors

Effective exploration remains a central challenge in model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL), particularly in high-dimensional continuous control tasks where sample efficiency is crucial. A prominent line of recent work leverages learned policies as proposal distributions for Model-Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) planning. Initial approaches update the sampling policy independently of the planner distribution, typically maximizing a learned value function with deterministic policy gradient and entropy regularization. However, because the states encountered during training depend on the MPPI planner, aligning the sampling policy with the planner improves the accuracy of value estimation and long-term performance. To this end, recent methods update the sampling policy by minimizing KL divergence to the planner distribution or by introducing planner-guided regularization into the policy update. In this work, we unify these MPPI-based reinforcement learning methods under a single framework by introducing Policy Optimization-Model Predictive Control (PO-MPC), a family of KL-regularized MBRL methods that integrate the planner's action distribution as a prior in policy optimization. By aligning the learned policy with the planner's behavior, PO-MPC allows more flexibility in the policy updates to trade off Return maximization and KL divergence minimization. We clarify how prior approaches emerge as special cases of this family, and we explore previously unstudied variations. Our experiments show that these extended configurations yield significant performance improvements, advancing the state of the art in MPPI-based RL.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Towards a Practical Understanding of Lagrangian Methods in Safe Reinforcement Learning

Safe reinforcement learning addresses constrained optimization problems where maximizing performance must be balanced against safety constraints, and Lagrangian methods are a widely used approach for this purpose. However, the effectiveness of Lagrangian methods depends crucially on the choice of the Lagrange multiplier $λ$, which governs the multi-objective trade-off between return and cost. A common practice is to update the multiplier automatically during training. Although this approach is standard in practice, there remains limited empirical evidence on the optimally achievable trade-off between return and cost as a function of $λ$, and there is currently no systematic benchmark comparing automated update mechanisms to this empirical optimum. Therefore, we study (i) the constraint geometry for eight widely used safety tasks and (ii) the previously overlooked constraint-regime sensitivity of different Lagrange multiplier update mechanisms in safe reinforcement learning. Through the lens of multi-objective analysis, we present empirical Pareto frontiers that offer a complete visualization of the trade-off between return and cost in the underlying optimization problem. Our results reveal the highly sensitive nature of $λ$ and further show that the restrictiveness of the constraint cost can vary across different cost limits within the same task. This highlights the importance of careful cost limit selection across different regions of cost restrictiveness when evaluating safe reinforcement learning methods. We provide a recommended set of cost limits for each evaluated task and offer an open-source code base: https://github.com/lindsayspoor/Lagrangian_SafeRL.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

A Unified Framework for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning

Zero-shot reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a setting for developing general agents, capable of solving downstream tasks without additional training or planning at test-time. While conventional RL optimizes policies for fixed rewards, zero-shot RL requires learning representations that enable immediate adaptation to arbitrary reward functions. As the field matures, the growing diversity of approaches demands a foundational framework reconciling different perspectives under a common unifying structure. In this work, we introduce a formal, unified framework for zero-shot RL, allowing for rigorous comparisons across methods. We propose a taxonomy organizing the algorithmic landscape along two levels: representation, distinguishing between compositional and direct methods based on their exploitation of action-value function decompositions; and learning paradigm, differentiating between reward-free and pseudo reward-free training. Additionally, we propose a unified view of existing error bounds, decomposing the total error into three primary contributing components: inference, reward, and approximation, serving as a foundation for more grounded comparisons of zero-shot methods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

On the Effect of Regularization in Policy Mirror Descent

Policy Mirror Descent (PMD) has emerged as a unifying framework in reinforcement learning (RL) by linking policy gradient methods with a first-order optimization method known as mirror descent. At its core, PMD incorporates two key regularization components: (i) a distance term that enforces a trust region for stable policy updates and (ii) an MDP regularizer that augments the reward function to promote structure and robustness. While PMD has been extensively studied in theory, empirical investigations remain scarce. This work provides a large-scale empirical analysis of the interplay between these two regularization techniques, running over 500k training seeds on small RL environments. Our results demonstrate that, although the two regularizers can partially substitute each other, their precise combination is critical for achieving robust performance. These findings highlight the potential for advancing research on more robust algorithms in RL, particularly with respect to hyperparameter sensitivity.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Chargax: A JAX Accelerated EV Charging Simulator

Deep Reinforcement Learning can play a key role in addressing sustainable energy challenges. For instance, many grid systems are heavily congested, highlighting the urgent need to enhance operational efficiency. However, reinforcement learning approaches have traditionally been slow due to the high sample complexity and expensive simulation requirements. While recent works have effectively used GPUs to accelerate data generation by converting environments to JAX, these works have largely focussed on classical toy problems. This paper introduces Chargax, a JAX-based environment for realistic simulation of electric vehicle charging stations designed for accelerated training of RL agents. We validate our environment in a variety of scenarios based on real data, comparing reinforcement learning agents against baselines. Chargax delivers substantial computational performance improvements of over 100x-1000x over existing environments. Additionally, Chargax' modular architecture enables the representation of diverse real-world charging station configurations.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Reinforcement Learning for Sustainable Energy: A Survey

The transition to sustainable energy is a key challenge of our time, requiring modifications in the entire pipeline of energy production, storage, transmission, and consumption. At every stage, new sequential decision-making challenges emerge, ranging from the operation of wind farms to the management of electrical grids or the scheduling of electric vehicle charging stations. All such problems are well suited for reinforcement learning, the branch of machine learning that learns behavior from data. Therefore, numerous studies have explored the use of reinforcement learning for sustainable energy. This paper surveys this literature with the intention of bridging both the underlying research communities: energy and machine learning. After a brief introduction of both fields, we systematically list relevant sustainability challenges, how they can be modeled as a reinforcement learning problem, and what solution approaches currently exist in the literature. Afterwards, we zoom out and identify overarching reinforcement learning themes that appear throughout sustainability, such as multi-agent, offline, and safe reinforcement learning. Lastly, we also cover standardization of environments, which will be crucial for connecting both research fields, and highlight potential directions for future work. In summary, this survey provides an extensive overview of reinforcement learning methods for sustainable energy, which may play a vital role in the energy transition.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2017

RRT-CoLearn: towards kinodynamic planning without numerical trajectory optimization

Sampling-based kinodynamic planners, such as Rapidly-exploring Random Trees (RRTs), pose two fundamental challenges: computing a reliable (pseudo-)metric for the distance between two randomly sampled nodes, and computing a steering input to connect the nodes. The core of these challenges is a Two Point Boundary Value Problem, which is known to be NP-hard. Recently, the distance metric has been approximated using supervised learning, reducing computation time drastically. The previous work on such learning RRTs use direct optimal control to generate the data for supervised learning. This paper proposes to use indirect optimal control instead, because it provides two benefits: it reduces the computational effort to generate the data, and it provides a low dimensional parametrization of the action space. The latter allows us to learn both the distance metric and the steering input to connect two nodes. This eliminates the need for a local planner in learning RRTs. Experimental results on a pendulum swing up show 10-fold speed-up in both the offline data generation and the online planning time, leading to at least a 10-fold speed-up in the overall planning time.

cs.RO↗