arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Thomas Fel

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Fel.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Shaping & Monitoring Models through their Internal Representations

We propose Mechanistic Shaping, a unified framework for shaping models through their internal representations. Mechanistic Shaping is applied during training so that models follow specifications (rules) about which concepts they express, measured via their outputs or internal representations (e.g., no harmful content), and also which concepts they rely on, i.e., what they use to make their decisions (e.g., not a candidate's gender when screening a résumé). Across multiple domains (vision, medical imaging, language), scales (up to 32B parameters), and training paradigms (classification, SFT, DPO, GRPO), we find that Mechanistic Shaping substantially reduces targeted behaviors while preserving task performance. Since training against a representation can also modify it, we ask whether shaped concepts remain monitorable, a question that depends on the class of monitors considered. We therefore introduce a hierarchy of such classes, which separates a concept that escapes one probe from a concept that is truly gone. We characterize three geometric mechanisms of circumvention: the concept can drift away from the monitor, be erased from the layer, or persist in higher-order statistics as a nonlinear encoding, which we explain through a product-code construction. Although other mechanisms may arise in different settings or at larger scales, these three account for all of our observations, and each can be detected by a matching monitor. In practice, we find that shaped concepts largely remain monitorable: refitted linear probes recover the concept in most settings, and the original probe remains reliable whenever gradients do not flow through it. Taken together, these results point to the potential of using interpretability as a tool for training, and call for a correspondingly rigorous science of interpretability-based training.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

A Phenomenology of Neural Geometry in Vision-Language-Action Models

Robotic manipulation is inherently geometric, but what shape does the world take inside the policy that performs it? Prior work on vision-language-action (VLA) policies establishes that task-relevant variables are linearly readable from activations, yet readability certifies only that a variable is present and says nothing about the shape its values trace, which may be curved and multi-dimensional. Using controlled sweeps, natural rollouts, linear probes, and activation interventions, we build a taxonomy of seven task-relevant concepts in VLA models. We find that realized geometry is predominantly multi-dimensional and is shaped by the constraints under which the policy acts. Physical joint limits, for example, leave wrist orientation an open arc rather than a circle, and distance to the target, a single scalar, is realized in two orthogonal subspaces, a coarse ruler for the approach and a fine ruler for the grasp. The same geometries reappear in two further VLA models on real-world robot data, indicating that they are neither model-specific nor artifacts of simulation. We demonstrate how the findings are actionable by steering along the geometry a concept realizes. Overall, this work lays out an initial phenomenology of realized geometry in VLA policies and demonstrates that a concept's shape carries as much importance as its readability.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

A Unifying Framework for Concept-Based Representational Similarity

Learned representations across models and modalities often exhibit striking structural similarities, suggesting shared underlying concept decompositions. However, concept alignment remains poorly defined: existing approaches optimize different objectives under the same terminology, obscuring what is actually aligned. We propose a unifying framework that decomposes alignment along two axes: what is aligned (representations vs. concepts) and at what level (instance-wise vs. distributional). This induces four corresponding properties---instance-wise and distributional variants of translation and concept consistency---and reveals precisely which of these guarantees existing methods provide. We further introduce InterVenchA, an intervention-based benchmark that separately measures extraction quality, translation quality, and concept consistency---which we validate against human perception of concept alignment. Using this framework, we show that commonly assumed equivalences between alignment objectives fail in practice: optimizing one property does not reliably recover the others, and, on real embeddings, purely unsupervised objectives fail to recover meaningful instance-level alignment. As a constructive consequence, a model, the Coupled SAE (CoSAE), matches or exceeds specialized alignment methods such as crosscoders and Universal SAEs on their own target metrics, by jointly enforcing the properties identified by our framework without any architectural innovation. Moreover, as little as 1% paired data is sufficient to recover instance-level alignment when anchoring distributional objectives. Overall, concept alignment is fundamentally multi-objective, and progress requires treating it as such. Our framework and benchmark provide the means to define, measure, and compare concept alignment methods on this basis.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Causal Analysis of Robot Foundation Models Enables Efficiency Gains

Vision-language-action (VLA) models are a promising approach to general purpose robot manipulation. While the internal computation of vision-language models, which compose the backbone of VLAs, has been studied extensively, less is known about how their perceptual and semantic representations are transformed into action in VLA models. We study this question mechanistically in three frontier VLA models ($π_{0.5}$, MolmoAct2, and MolmoBot) by analyzing the causal pathways through which the input image and the instruction shape actions. Across the three models, activation patching shows that causally relevant information influences the action expert (AE) through a narrow band of mid-to-late cross-attention layers, which we term the action-conditioning interface. The content of this information changes with token and layer within the model. Early-to-mid layer representations of the target noun token determine which object is selected, whereas mid-to-late layers carry the spatial information in text tokens that redirects the movement when patched. Where spatial information is stored in prompt tokens various based on the architecture. In MolmoAct2 the model forms task-conditioned representations at the text positions that follow the instruction, whereas $π_{0.5}$ additionally stores this information at image token positions. We show that these findings can be translated directly into improving model efficiency. We find that restricting MolmoBot's action expert conditioning to only 3 out of 36 layers reduces inference FLOPs by up to $33\%$ while maintaining comparable task success with the default model across 3,000 evaluation episodes ($46.7\%$ vs. $46.9\%$), and the same principle carries over to real-robot deployment of $π_{0.5}$.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Multi-Dimensional Featurizers Yield Fine-Grained Steering and Data Shaping in Robot Foundation Models

Can better feature discovery improve control over robot behavior through internal interventions and training data? Recent work in vision and language models reveals multidimensional features, motivating block-sparse featurizers (BSFs), which represent each feature in a low-dimensional subspace. We investigate whether recovering this structure provides an interpretable interface for steering vision-language-action models and shaping the data from which they learn. We show that BSFs recover several multi-dimensional task-relevant features underlying the model's computation (e.g., perception, language, proprioceptive state, episode phase, and control variables). We causally validate these features through fine-grained steering: targeted changes in visual perception, semantic representation, and spatial localization produce predictable changes in downstream action prediction. Finally, we use feature-based data attribution to isolate where a specific behavior (failure recovery) arises in the training dataset, identifying fewer than $1.4\%$ of training tokens whose masking is sufficient to remove the targeted behavior. Overall, our results show how matching featurizers to representation geometry can provide more effective tools for understanding and changing robot behavior.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Monitoring and Discovering Reward Hacking with Internal Representations during LLM Evaluations

As models scale, reward hacking becomes more frequent, more sophisticated, and more consequential. Does it leave a telltale signature in model representations? This work analyzes how reward hacking is represented internally in frontier open source LLMs, and how those representations can be used to understand and discover the range of hacking behaviors a model displays. In particular, we find that simple difference of means vectors coherently represent reward hacking in Kimi K3, GLM 5.2, and Qwen 3.8 Max across a variety of behaviors in common evaluations. Despite their simplicity, these vectors are both generalizable and interpretable, and we can use them to reliably detect reward hacking. We first evaluate reward hacking in commonly reported benchmarks like DeepSWE and SWE-bench, finding that models reward hack excessively in these environments; GLM 5.2 hacks in 57.2% of rollouts on DeepSWE and in 73% of rollouts on SWE-bench. Catching these requires monitors; LLM monitors are effective, but expensive detectors. We show that DoM vectors are similarly effective but virtually free, catching 3.1% more hacks in Kimi K3 and 7.9% fewer hacks in GLM 5.2 on DeepSWE at a monitor matched false positive rate. DoM vectors run on the chain-of-thought also predict reward hacks in the model's subsequent actions, meaning we can run them online and catch potential hacks before they occur. Finally, we analyze probe-hits that LLM monitors do not catch and discover other undesirable behaviors, as well as show transfer to finding hacks in non-SWE evaluations. Together, these results provide evidence that simple, white-box methods can be used to scalably study and monitor reward hacking behaviors in frontier open source models

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Inference and learning in sparse autoencoders as natural gradient flow

Sparse autoencoders are widely used to uncover interpretable features in neural networks, yet reliable recovery remains difficult when features overlap or activate infrequently. These challenges involve both inferring which features explain an input and learning the dictionary that represents them. Here, we unify inference and dictionary learning as natural-gradient flows on a shared variational free energy. We instantiate this framework as BeFOND, an encoder-free sparse coding model with closed-form inference and learning dynamics. We show how recurrent explaining away reduces interference between overlapping features, while Fisher preconditioning can compensate for the slow learning of rare features. On synthetic data, BeFOND improves dictionary recovery and rare-feature detection, with a growing advantage over amortized baselines as superposition increases. On language-model activations, it improves single-feature concept detection and selective intervention, outperforming pretrained reference SAEs with substantially less training data. Its feature quality continues to improve with dictionary width, whereas the evaluated baselines largely plateau. Together, these results show how improving inference and learning within a unified probabilistic framework can make better use of data and dictionary capacity to interpret and intervene on neural representations.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Language Model Activations Inhabit Privileged Error-Correcting Basins

Language models exhibit remarkable robustness, continuing to produce coherent text even when their activations are perturbed by interventions like linear steering. We hypothesize that this robustness is a result of passive dynamics, i.e., constraining mechanisms in the forward pass that funnel activations toward "good" regions that produce coherent outputs. To investigate these hypothesized error-correcting mechanisms, we probe the geometry of language model activation space by observing the action of model layers on low-dimensional curves. In doing so, we discover that model activations occur within a cluster of distinct attracting basins, which differentiate natural activations geometrically from distributionally similar synthetic activations. Applying this lens to language model steering, we observe feature-specific basins along semantic steering directions, and find that steering moves activations between these basins. To demonstrate the active role of this geometry in neural computation, we show that adaptively modulating steering strength to transport activations across basins improves inter-language steering, significantly increasing the probability of sampling tokens from the target language compared to fixed-strength steering. Our findings establish analysis of activation space geometry as a promising approach to interpreting and controlling language models.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

The Independence Prior of SAEs Fragments Visual Concepts

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) decompose model activations into sparse combinations of interpretable dictionary atoms. Although SAEs are grounded in the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH), their objective smuggles in an additional prior: concepts across patches are treated as independent, an assumption clearly violated by natural images and by the activations they induce. We therefore specialize LRH to vision through the Markov-Field Linear Representation Hypothesis (MFLRH), which adds the missing spatial dependencies to the LRH assumptions. We thus propose Spatial-SAE as an amortized MAP estimator under the MFLRH. Spatial-SAE consistently outperforms standard SAEs in concept recovery and interpretability. Across four variants, it achieves a 96% average win rate on synthetic concept recovery and improves interpretability on DINOv2 activations, at a reconstruction cost concentrated in high spatial frequencies.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

When Models Don't Manipulate Manifolds: The Geometry of a Comparison Task

One of the current premises of mechanistic interpretability research is that detailed accounts of the geometry of neural network representations can tell us how models perform computations, and how to effectively intervene on them. While low dimensional manifolds have been observed for multiple concepts in the literature (e.g. numbers encoded on helices, days of the week on a circle, ...), with structure believed to reflect properties of data and tasks, the extent to which models rely on them for computation, and how they manipulate them, remains unclear. We characterize precisely the geometry of computation in a number-comparison task, as an abstraction of comparison for decision making, and how models utilize geometry in an elegant fashion to implement it. Specifically, we study the causal geometry of number comparison in Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, a capable and widely studied open-weight model, and find Qwen largely uses linear representations of numbers despite the presence of curved geometry. To compare two numbers, the model first encodes each number along a vector and adds the two representations using attention and the residual connection, bringing them into a shared space in the residual stream. Then, the model uses MLP neurons to compare the pair of numbers on local regions in this shared space, which correspond to smaller intervals of input numbers, and combines these to obtain the position of the maximum. In fact, this reliance on linear representations for comparison also persists when the model compares three numbers. Our findings demonstrate that the manifold hypothesis can co-exist with linear representations: while concepts that are ordered may have manifold structure in representations, the model may use an underlying linear structure of the concept in certain computations.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Sparse, self-organizing ensembles of local kernels detect rare statistical anomalies

Modern artificial intelligence has revolutionized how we extract representations from scientific data, yet the statistical properties of these representations remain poorly controlled, causing misspecified anomaly detection methods to falter. The hardest anomalies to detect are the rare, weakly separable ones hiding within the nominal distribution-a regime that grows in importance as models mature and easily separable signals are exhausted. We identify structural desiderata for detection in this regime under minimal prior information: sparsity, to enforce parsimony; locality, to preserve geometric sensitivity; and competition, to promote efficient allocation of model capacity. These principles define a class of self-organizing local kernels that adaptively partition the representation space around regions of statistical imbalance. As an instantiation, we introduce SparKer, a sparse ensemble of Gaussian kernels trained in a semi-supervised Neyman-Pearson framework to locally model the likelihood ratio between a sample that may contain anomalies and an anomaly-free reference. We provide theoretical insights into the mechanisms driving detection and self-organization, and demonstrate the approach on realistic high-dimensional problems in scientific discovery, open-world novelty detection, intrusion detection, and generative-model validation. Ensembles of only a handful of kernels identify statistically significant anomalies in representation spaces of thousands of dimensions while remaining sensitive across regimes, underscoring the interpretability, efficiency, and scalability of the approach.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Structuring Sparsity: Block-Sparse Featurizers Capture Visual Concept Manifolds

What is the geometry of a visual percept? The most widely used protocols for decomposing neural network representations into interpretable parts treat concepts as isolated directions, yet recent work shows that concepts are often realized as geometric structures in low dimensional regions of activation space. We turn to the literature of Structured sparsity to close this gap, and show that block sparsity, which groups directions into blocks, is the prior matched to a generative model in which a representation is a sparse sum of low-dimensional manifolds: the modern, learned form of a classical idea in visual neuroscience, where a visual feature is carried by a coordinated group of neurons rather than a single tuned one. We implement three variants of block-sparse featurizers (BSFs) and, through a minimum-description-length analysis, show that all three describe activations more compactly than direction-based featurizers, with the recovered concepts typically two- to four-dimensional. We then use BSFs to (i) recontextualize prior work, showing that curve detectors in InceptionV1 actually read from a single continuous curve manifold, (ii) discover novel manifolds including shadows and lighting in DINOv3, and (iii) support interpretable control of image generation in diffusion models (SDXL) via manifold steering.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Anatomy of Post-Training: Using Interpretability to Characterize Data and Shape the Learning Signal

Language-model post-training is the main stage at which model behavior is shaped, yet it still largely involves optimization of scalar rewards that summarize diverse desiderata. This abstraction gives practitioners little visibility into what their data actually teaches models, allowing spurious correlations to be learned by a model and inducing undesirable behaviors such as over-stylization and sycophancy. To address this problem, we ask: can we inspect a preference dataset before optimization and decide, at the level of concepts, which behaviors a model should be allowed to learn? Motivated by this, we introduce a data-centric post-training pipeline that uses interpretability protocols to develop statistical hypotheses for the latent concepts separating preferred from dispreferred generations, making them explicit for fine-grained user feedback. Building on this view, we unify several interpretability-based training protocols as ways of shaping rewards via feature or data interventions. Empirically, we show that our pipeline diagnoses undesirable signals in existing preference data, mitigates off-target learning, and can also help amplify or shape desired properties such as safeguards and model personality. More broadly, our results suggest that interpretability can turn post-training from optimizing opaque proxy rewards into a process of auditing and sculpting the learning signal itself.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

A Geometric Unification of Concept Learning with Concept Cones

Two traditions of interpretability have evolved side by side but seldom spoken to each other: Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), which prescribe what a concept should be, and Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), which discover what concepts emerge. While CBMs use supervision to align activations with human-labeled concepts, SAEs rely on sparse coding to uncover emergent ones. We show that both paradigms instantiate the same geometric structure: each learns a set of linear directions in activation space whose nonnegative combinations form a concept cone. Supervised and unsupervised methods thus differ not in kind but in how they select this cone. Building on this view, we propose an operational bridge between the two paradigms. CBMs provide human-defined reference geometries, while SAEs can be evaluated by how well their learned cones approximate or contain those of CBMs. This containment framework yields quantitative metrics linking inductive biases -- such as SAE type, sparsity, or expansion ratio -- to emergence of plausible\footnote{We adopt the terminology of \citet{jacovi2020towards}, who distinguish between faithful explanations (accurately reflecting model computations) and plausible explanations (aligning with human intuition and domain knowledge). CBM concepts are plausible by construction -- selected or annotated by humans -- though not necessarily faithful to the true latent factors that organise the data manifold.} concepts. Using these metrics, we uncover a ``sweet spot'' in both sparsity and expansion factor that maximizes both geometric and semantic alignment with CBM concepts. Overall, our work unifies supervised and unsupervised concept discovery through a shared geometric framework, providing principled metrics to measure SAE progress and assess how well discovered concept align with plausible human concepts.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

The Case for Model Science: Verify, Explore, Steer, Refine

We argue that the AI community is now ready to move beyond benchmarking and consolidate scattered efforts in model analysis into a systematic discipline, a direction we term Model Science. Complex AI models now serve billions of users, yet our understanding of how they work lags far behind our ability to deploy them. Decades of benchmark-driven research have delivered remarkable progress: extensive leaderboards, a wide range of performance metrics, tracking capability gains across diverse tasks; yet this success has also revealed the limits of benchmarks as they tell us whether models perform but not why they succeed or fail, they miss critical failure modes, such as hallucinations or shortcuts. Precedents from established sciences point the way forward: cognitive science shows that understanding complex systems requires complementary levels of analysis; neuroscience demonstrates that deep study of single cases reveals what population studies miss; medicine teaches that specialised training must develop alongside research practice; and agriculture models how shared infrastructure and principles enable cumulative progress. These lessons inform three foundations for Model Science. First, we propose to consolidate research around four functional perspectives: Verify, Explore, Steer, and Refine that address complementary questions about model behaviour. Second, we discuss the required infrastructure for cumulative knowledge: catalogues of datasets, models and findings. Third, we highlight the need for deep analysis of individual model instances, not just model families, because single cases can reveal what population studies miss.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Into the Rabbit Hull: From Task-Relevant Concepts in DINO to Minkowski Geometry

DINOv2 is routinely deployed to recognize objects, scenes, and actions; yet the nature of what it perceives remains unknown. As a working baseline, we adopt the Linear Representation Hypothesis (LRH) and operationalize it using SAEs, producing a 32,000-unit dictionary that serves as the interpretability backbone of our study, which unfolds in three parts. In the first part, we analyze how different downstream tasks recruit concepts from our learned dictionary, revealing functional specialization: classification exploits "Elsewhere" concepts that fire everywhere except on target objects, implementing learned negations; segmentation relies on boundary detectors forming coherent subspaces; depth estimation draws on three distinct monocular depth cues matching visual neuroscience principles. Following these functional results, we analyze the geometry and statistics of the concepts learned by the SAE. We found that representations are partly dense rather than strictly sparse. The dictionary evolves toward greater coherence and departs from maximally orthogonal ideals (Grassmannian frames). Within an image, tokens occupy a low dimensional, locally connected set persisting after removing position. These signs suggest representations are organized beyond linear sparsity alone. Synthesizing these observations, we propose a refined view: tokens are formed by combining convex mixtures of archetypes (e.g., a rabbit among animals, brown among colors, fluffy among textures). This structure is grounded in Gardenfors' conceptual spaces and in the model's mechanism as multi-head attention produces sums of convex mixtures, defining regions bounded by archetypes. We introduce the Minkowski Representation Hypothesis (MRH) and examine its empirical signatures and implications for interpreting vision-transformer representations.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Manifold Steering Reveals the Shared Geometry of Neural Network Representation and Behavior

Neural representations carry rich geometric structure; but does that structure causally shape behavior? To address this question, we intervene along paths through activation space defined by different geometries, and measure the behavioral trajectories they induce. In particular, we test whether interventions that respect the geometry of activation space will yield behaviors close to those the model exhibits naturally. Concretely, we first fit an activation manifold $M_h$ to representations and a behavior manifold $M_y$ to output probability distributions. We then test the link $M_h \leftrightarrow M_y$ via interventions: we find that steering along $M_h$, which we term manifold steering, yields behavioral trajectories that follow $M_y$, while linear steering -- which assumes a Euclidean geometry -- cuts through off-manifold regions and hence produces unnatural outputs. Moreover, optimizing interventions in activation space to produce paths along $M_y$ recovers activation trajectories that trace the curvature of $M_h$. We demonstrate this bidirectional relationship between the geometry of representation and behavior across tasks and modalities. In language models, we use reasoning tasks with cyclic and sequential geometries as well as in-context learning tasks with more complex graph geometries. In a video world model, we use a task with geometry corresponding to physical dynamics. Overall, our work shows that geometry in neural representation is not merely incidental, but is in fact the proper object for enabling principled control via intervention on internals. This recasts the core problem of steering from finding the right direction to finding the right geometry.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Arithmetic in the Wild: Llama uses Base-10 Addition to Reason About Cyclic Concepts

Does structure in representations imply structure in computation? We study how Llama-3.1-8B reasons over cyclic concepts (e.g., "what month is six months after August?"). Even though Llama-3.1-8B's representations for these concepts are circularly structured, we find that instead of directly computing modular addition in the period of the cyclic concept (e.g., 12 for months), the model re-uses a generic addition mechanism across tasks that operates independently of concept-specific geometry. First, it computes the sum of its two inputs using base-10 addition (six + August=14). Then, it maps this sum back to cyclic concept space (14->February). We show that Llama-3.1-8B uses task-agnostic Fourier features to compute these sums--in fact, these features have periods that respect standard base-10 addition, e.g., 2, 5, and 10, rather than the cyclic concept period (e.g., 12 for months). Furthermore, we identify a sparse set of 28 MLP neurons re-used across all tasks (approximately 0.2% of the MLP at layer 18) that can be partitioned into disjoint clusters, each computing the sum for a Fourier feature with a different period. Our work highlights how an interplay between causal abstraction and feature geometry can deepen our mechanistic understanding of LMs.

cs.AI↗