arXiv subjects

Tejasvi Singh Tomar

Publications and source records attributed to Tejasvi Singh Tomar.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The rank of $3\times 3$ matrix multiplication over $\mathbb{F}_2$ is 23

The rank of the tensor of $3\times 3$ matrix multiplication over the field with two elements is at most $23$ by Laderman's algorithm, and Rudich and Rousseau recently proved that it is at least $22$. We prove that it equals $23$. Hence Laderman's algorithm uses the fewest multiplications among all bilinear algorithms over $\mathbb{F}_2$ and among all bilinear algorithms with integer coefficients. The proof uses the substitution method in the form developed by D'Ambrosio, Wang and Yang et al., which bounds the number of first factors of a decomposition that lie in a given subspace of the space of first factors. We sharpen these bounds for $111$ of Wang's $496$ classes of subspaces, constrain the ranks of the first factors through a $27\times 27$ flattening of the tensor, and list, up to symmetry, all sets of $22$ first factors that satisfy these constraints. An exact completion search shows that none of them is the set of first factors of a decomposition. The computation emits certificates, which are checked in the Lean 4 proof assistant. In one formal proof the largest checks are evaluated as compiled code, and in a second one the kernel evaluates every check, so that its final theorem depends only on the three standard axioms of Lean. The Lean proofs build on the formalization of Rudich and Rousseau and import their table of bounds and their reduction for block algorithms.

math.RA↗

arXiv2026

Finiteness of planar central configurations of five bodies for all positive masses

We prove that for every choice of five positive masses the planar five-body problem has finitely many central configurations up to similarity. This settles Smale's sixth problem for five bodies in the plane. Albouy and Kaloshin proved it for masses outside a closed algebraic subset of codimension two. We follow their method. Infinitely many central configurations would give an algebraic curve of complex solutions. At the places at infinity of the curve the valuations of the mutual distances must balance. We determine the possible valuation vectors at all positive masses, together with the mass conditions under which each can occur. We treat limits in which four bodies form a cluster of zero potential energy by expanding the potential, which is constant along the curve, at a place. This excludes, at every positive mass, one of the two diagrams in which such clusters occur, and part of the other. The same expansion excludes one further diagram at every positive mass. What remains is an exact analysis, by computer algebra, of the sets of mass conditions that can hold together at positive masses. Exact rational certificates show that the balance fails under each of them, except on a few one-parameter families of masses, which we treat separately. On the rays through $(1,4,4,4,4)$ and $(1,1,4,4,4)$ the certificates do not apply. On the first ray they cannot apply: there the complex equations have a continuum of solutions, as Albouy and Kaloshin observed. On these rays we count the real central configurations: there are 306 and 294 up to orientation-preserving similarity. The certificates, the programs that check them and a proof of the theorem in the Lean proof assistant are available.

math.DS↗

arXiv2026

Uniqueness of four-body convex central configurations for all masses

We prove that for every choice of four positive masses and every cyclic ordering of the bodies there is exactly one strictly convex planar central configuration with that ordering, up to similarity. This answers Problem 10 in the list of Albouy, Cabral and Santos, which Santoprete calls the Simó-Yoccoz conjecture. The main step is a uniform lower bound for the Hessian at convex central configurations: it is at least one quarter of its radial part, which vanishes only on translations and rotations. Dziobek's relations turn the indefinite part of the Hessian into a negative multiple of a square, and a Cauchy-Schwarz argument bounds this term by the radial part times the trace of an explicit $2\times 2$ matrix in which the masses do not appear. We prove that this trace is less than 3/4 by interval arithmetic on the three-dimensional set of normalized convex central configurations, in the coordinates of Corbera, Cors and Roberts. Uniqueness then follows by a covering argument from the case of four equal masses. The computation has been repeated with a second, independently written program. The Hessian bound and the uniqueness theorem, including the computation, have been formalized in the Lean proof assistant and checked by its kernel, using only the standard axioms. As consequences, every degenerate four-body central configuration is concave, the convex central configuration depends analytically on the masses, and the known symmetry theorems for kites, isosceles trapezoids and rhombi follow in a few lines. The analytic dependence and the symmetry theorems are also formalized.

math.DS↗