arXiv subjects

Tejasvi C. Addagada

Publications and source records attributed to Tejasvi C. Addagada.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Structural Jailbreaks Generalize but Do Not Compound: A cross-provider and multilingual study of Involuntary In-Context Learning

Aligned language models fail under two independent pressures: the structural jailbreak class recently formalized as Involuntary In-Context Learning (IICL), which reframes a harmful request as the final missing cell of a data-labeling task completed by pattern rather than judged as content; and the erosion of safety alignment outside English. A natural hypothesis is that these compound. We test it directly. Using a deterministic IICL operator and a StrongREJECT-style rubric judge, we red-team two Google Gemini models on two benchmarks, a 30 general-harm behaviours from HarmBench and 30 financial-abuse behaviours from FinProof, each under a single-shot baseline and under IICL in four languages (English, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic). First, IICL generalizes to a second provider and is worse in finance: it lifts attack success from <=6.7% to 80-90% on HarmBench and 97-100% on FinProof, an order of magnitude above the <=24% its introducing study reported on OpenAI's GPT-5.4. Second, against the hypothesis, forcing the IICL output into a non-English language does not stack the two weaknesses, it attenuates the attack. Eleven of twelve non-English conditions score below their English baseline (sign test, p~0.003), the lone exception a ceiling tie near 100%; on the stronger model's financial set Arabic collapses from 100% to 33%. We attribute this to a relevance curse: once structure has unlocked compliance, the models produce lower-quality harmful content in lower-resource languages, which a substance-grading judge scores as partial. The pattern replicates under an independent non-Google judge (Cohen's kappa=0.86, 377 paired verdicts), and 76.6% of non-English responses were verified in-language. Jailbreak vulnerabilities are therefore not additive; the dominant residual risk is the English structural attack, most acute for financial abuse, not a multilingual one.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Governing the KV Cache: Preventing Timing Side-Channel Leakage in Multi-Tenant LLM Inference

The key-value (KV) cache is the primary throughput optimization in modern large language model (LLM) inference, enabling prefix reuse across requests. In multi-tenant deployments this cache is shared across tenants, creating a timing side channel: an adversarial tenant can reconstruct another tenant's private prompt by probing cache-hit latency. Three published attacks exploit it -- PROMPTPEEK, EarlyBird and InputSnatch -- reaching up to 100% attack success rate against unprotected vLLM and SGLang, with rates varying by cache architecture and prompt structure. We present KVGov, a governance layer addressing all three attack families' prefix-cache paths under one mechanism. A per-principal salt sigma_p = HMAC_K(secret, principal_id) seeds the block-hash chain, making cache keys cryptographically disjoint across principals. An ablation (N=1000 trials, seed 2026, deterministic judges) isolates this salt as the necessary and sufficient component. KVGov adds ORIGAMI, a Stackelberg water-filling audit scheduler that reduces adversary expected utility by 12.6% at realistic tenant heterogeneity (Gini 0.63), and an evolutionary stability analysis giving a 31.6% adversary-prevalence tipping point below which global caching remains stable. On real hardware (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, vLLM 0.26.0, NVIDIA A100) we measure a gate-verified cold/cached TTFT ratio of 0.22, confirming the channel is exploitable at production scale; the defense itself is evaluated in simulation calibrated to those measurements. We replicate the channel on an independent stack (llama.cpp on Apple Metal, ratio 0.093). Finally, isolation and cache efficiency need not conflict: identifying information resides only where prompts diverge, so injecting the salt at that boundary rather than the chain root retains an estimated 93% of the prefix-cache benefit with no cross-principal signal.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Semalith v1.4: A Calibrated 184M Safety Classifier Achieving State-of-the-Art Prompt-Injection Detection at 44x Fewer Parameters than Llama-Guard-3-8B

Deploying large language models in financial-services and agentic settings requires safety classifiers that simultaneously handle prompt injection, regulatory compliance, and general harm, a combination no existing open guardrail addresses in a single inference pass. Semalith v1.4 is a 184M-parameter DeBERTa-v3-base classifier performing simultaneous three-axis safety classification including prompt injection, general harm, and financial-services regulatory compliance, in a single forward pass. Its 22-class head (BENIGN, nine prompt-injection sub-types, general-harm, eleven BFSI labels) is trained with a 4-class auxiliary super-category head under jointly weighted loss, on a 76,204-row corpus mined from 49 public sources with SHA-1 deduplication against every held-out evaluation set, with 21 of 22 benchmarks at zero contamination (max 0.22%). Against Llama-Guard-3-8B on 22 held-out benchmarks, Semalith v1.4 wins every prompt-injection evaluation (7/7) and 11 of 18 benchmarks overall at 44x fewer parameters, with FPR = 0.000 on 208 benign agentic prompts vs 0.063 for Llama-Guard-3-8B. On general-harm benchmarks (WildGuardMix, HEx-PHI, HarmBench), Llama-Guard-3 leads; this complementary split is documented in Section 4. Six measured weak spots are disclosed in Section 6. Deployment guidance: v1.3 is recommended for conversational moderation deployments (ToxicChat F1 0.624); v1.4 is recommended when BFSI label coverage or zero-FPR on benign agentic prompts is the priority.

cs.LG↗