arXiv subjects

Sylvain Bodard

Publications and source records attributed to Sylvain Bodard.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Performance vs Consistency: Evaluating a Foundation Model in Lung-RADS Screening

Foundation models have recently demonstrated strong capabilities across a wide range of medical imaging tasks. However, their performance in structured clinical interpretation settings remains insufficiently explored. In lung cancer screening, interpretative variability persists despite standardized frameworks such as Lung-RADS. In this study, we evaluate MedGemma, a medical general-purpose foundation model derived from Gemini and its fine-tuned version adapted for lung cancer detection and diagnosis, compared against radiologists performing Lung-RADS v2022 assessment on the NLST dataset. Twelve radiologists independently evaluated each case in a multi-reader design, enabling quantification of inter-reader variability. Radiologists achieved a mean AUC of 0.90, with substantial variability across readers (range: 0.80-0.94). The native foundation model achieved an AUC of 0.70, failing to reach clinically relevant performance. In contrast, fine-tuning significantly improved performance to an AUC of 0.83, placing the model within the lower range of individual radiologists performance. These findings highlight a trade-off between peak accuracy and prediction consistency. Unlike radiologists, under fixed conditions, the model produces deterministic outputs, removing inter-run variability under identical inputs, in contrast to inter-reader variability observed among radiologists. This supports the role of fine-tuned foundation models potential complementary tools for clinical decision support, particularly in settings with limited expertise. However, evaluation is performed on a case-enriched cohort from NLST and does not account for real-world prevalence or external validation, limiting direct clinical generalization.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

How to measure intra-physician variability in clinical decision-making?

Intra-physician prescribing variability, the probability that one physician issues discordant decisions for two patients deemed comparable on observed covariates, holds great impact in quality of care, safety and cost. However, there are no known validated measurement methods. Here, we benchmark eight methods (Euclidean, Mahalanobis, Learned-Weights, Genetic Mahalanobis, Random Forest proximity, Mutual-Information-weighted, Latent Profile Analysis and Bayesian binomial generalized linear mixed model) against a synthetic ground truth across 94 experimental conditions. Learned-Weights matching achieves the lowest mean absolute error (0.027), followed by Mutual-Information-weighted matching (0.028) and RF Proximity (0.034). All eight discordance-analysis methods preserve the physician rank ordering with high fidelity (Spearman > 0.89 versus the ground truth on the SCORE2 experiment), as long as the physician variability groups are well separated. Under a continuous-heterogeneity physician model, rank preservation degrades substantially for unsupervised methods (Spearman = [0.28, 0.35]) but is retained by supervised feature-weighted methods and the GLMM (Spearman = [0.62, 0.68]). This controlled methodological evaluation is a foundation for validation on observational prescribing data. Once validated on observational prescribing data, these evaluated open-source estimators could turn prescribing inconsistency into a routinely measurable clinician-level quality metric, systematically complementing the existing literature on between-physician variation.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Size and Growth: Rethinking Lung Cancer Screening with AI Based Nodule Detection and Diagnosis

Early detection of malignant lung nodules remains constrained by size and growth based screening criteria, often delaying diagnosis. We present an integrated AI system that jointly performs nodule detection and malignancy assessment directly at the nodule level from low dose CT scans, within a unified CADe/CADx framework. Unlike conventional pipelines separating detection and diagnosis, our approach targets malignant nodules directly, redefining evaluation at the point where clinical decisions are made. To address limitations in dataset scale and explainability, the system consists of a Large Ensemble Model (LEM) combining ensembles of shallow deep learning and feature based models. It was trained and evaluated on 25,709 scans with 69,449 annotated nodules, with external validation on an independent cohort. It achieved an AUC of 0.98 internally and 0.945 externally, outperforming all growth based metrics, Lung RADS size based triage, European volume and VDT based screening criteria, radiologists, and leading AI models. The model maintains high sensitivity at low false positive rates, excels for small and early stage cancers, and enables malignancy assessment up to one year earlier than radiologists for indeterminate and slow growing nodules. This approach has the potential to streamline lung cancer screening workflows and support earlier, more actionable clinical decision making.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2023

MEDIMP: 3D Medical Images with clinical Prompts from limited tabular data for renal transplantation

Renal transplantation emerges as the most effective solution for end-stage renal disease. Occurring from complex causes, a substantial risk of transplant chronic dysfunction persists and may lead to graft loss. Medical imaging plays a substantial role in renal transplant monitoring in clinical practice. However, graft supervision is multi-disciplinary, notably joining nephrology, urology, and radiology, while identifying robust biomarkers from such high-dimensional and complex data for prognosis is challenging. In this work, taking inspiration from the recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs), we propose MEDIMP -- Medical Images with clinical Prompts -- a model to learn meaningful multi-modal representations of renal transplant Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE MRI) by incorporating structural clinicobiological data after translating them into text prompts. MEDIMP is based on contrastive learning from joint text-image paired embeddings to perform this challenging task. Moreover, we propose a framework that generates medical prompts using automatic textual data augmentations from LLMs. Our goal is to learn meaningful manifolds of renal transplant DCE MRI, interesting for the prognosis of the transplant or patient status (2, 3, and 4 years after the transplant), fully exploiting the limited available multi-modal data most efficiently. Extensive experiments and comparisons with other renal transplant representation learning methods with limited data prove the effectiveness of MEDIMP in a relevant clinical setting, giving new directions toward medical prompts. Our code is available at https://github.com/leomlck/MEDIMP.

cs.CV↗