arXiv subjects

Syeda Fabiayee Jahan

Publications and source records attributed to Syeda Fabiayee Jahan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Reading Between the Chapters: A Graph-Free RAG Rebuilt With AI and Human Feedback

Many questions about a book can only be answered by connecting passages chapters apart, such as a cough heard three times across a horse's life. We introduce CrossChapterQA, 1,853 such questions over 14 public-domain books. Each question lists the two to six chapters it needs (spanning half the book at the median) and the relation linking them, cites evidence from each, and has two independent reference answers graded blind. We use it to build LadderRAG, which indexes a book as passages, summaries and book-level cards for about $0.41 and answers a question for under a cent. Its first version failed mostly at retrieval. We redesigned it four times, steered by an LLM judge's verdicts and our analyses of failed answers: a design-level counterpart of RLAIF and RLHF in which feedback changes the architecture, not model weights. We also report the two redesigns that made answers worse. On the 191 questions its first version got wrong, the final version retrieves over twice as many required chapters on held-out books (recall 0.36 to 0.79), and ten annotators rate its answers 6.5/10 on average (764 ratings).

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Temperature, Not Knowledge: What Recursive Self-Training and Its Remedies Do to a Language Model's Confidence

Recursive self-training can collapse language models, and many proposed remedies target overconfidence, yet their effects on confidence are rarely measured. We study a five-round self-training loop on Qwen3-1.7B, using three seeds per compared method, and distinguish confidence temperature (drift from a calibrated starting point) from discrimination (ranking correct answers above incorrect ones). Accuracy and overall discrimination remain nearly unchanged, but confidence sharpens and the most confident answers become less reliable. Matching predictive entropy to the calibrated starting model each round recalibrates nearly as well as label-based temperature fitting, at both 1.7B and 8B. Sharpening is not inherent to self-training: exact samples from a model's distribution have zero expected gradient. Instead, most drift comes from fitting each generated answer twice, with top-p truncation contributing the rest; removing both keeps entropy on generated outputs flat. Remedies affect the two properties differently: truncated cross-entropy, an entropy bonus, and single-pass training preserve temperature without improving discrimination, while focal loss and multi-sample targets improve discrimination but cause underconfidence. Reference-data mixing also overshoots. Pairing a ranking-improving loss with label-free recalibration achieves both.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Label Smoothing in Disguise? Gated Knowledge Distillation for Low-Resource Bangla Generation

Gated knowledge distillation (KD) weights teacher signals per token or example, aiming to trust an imperfect teacher only where it seems reliable. We test two gates: EWAD (entropy-weighted agreement-aware distillation), which gates tokens by teacher confidence, and CHAD (counterfactual harm-aware distillation), which gates examples by gradient alignment with validation data. Across six Bangla-centric tasks, three student models (60M to about 2B parameters), and two teacher families, no gate significantly improves plain KD in 45 comparisons. KD also fails to beat cross-entropy (CE) fine-tuning on gold outputs in 40 single-seed comparisons or three-seed runs on four tasks; CE leads on every summarisation metric. The main benefit of KD is regularisation: over ten fixed epochs, CE students lose 0.030 to 0.044 token-F1 from their early-stopped checkpoint, versus 0.005 to 0.025 for distilled students. Teacher-free label smoothing closes most of this gap. In one comparison, a teacher 0.29 token-F1 worse yields students at most 0.009 worse. Thus, gating may change regularisation strength but has little teacher knowledge to select. Findings are limited to Bangla-centric tasks and small students. We will release code, data splits, predictions, and scores.

cs.CL↗