arXiv subjects

Suvrankar Datta

Publications and source records attributed to Suvrankar Datta.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Building a Cultural Perspective on Doctor-Patient Conversations

AI-powered medical scribes are increasingly used to transcribe doctor-patient conversations and automate clinical documentation. However, large-scale real-world consultation datasets are scarce due to the sensitivity of clinical conversations, leading developers to rely on simulated and LLM-generated synthetic consultations. While scalable, these alternatives may fail to capture culturally situated patterns of clinical interaction. We introduce interactional cultural markers, measurable patterns of doctor-patient interaction grounded in cross-cultural clinical communication, and use them to compare real, simulated, and synthetic consultations from Indian and US clinical contexts. We find distinct patterns of participation and control: Indian consultations involve greater patient participation but stronger doctor control, while US consultations exhibit balanced participation and open-ended discussion. Synthetic Indian consultations often fail to reproduce these patterns, instead converging toward US-like interaction. We identify additional synthetic signatures, including excessive doctor explanation and formulaic patient responses. We conclude by discussing implications for generating culturally grounded synthetic clinical conversations.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating Ambient Clinical Scribes in India: The Need for Multilingual Real-World Clinical Conversation Data

Ambient clinical scribes (ACS) are being rapidly deployed at scale across Global South healthcare settings, aiming to reduce clinician documentation time, especially in overburdened environments like India. These ACS are primarily developed or distilled from models built and validated on Global North speech, languages and consultation styles. Indian clinical encounters are brief, triadic, multilingual, code-mixed with low-resource languages, and conducted in highly resource-constrained, noisy settings -- increasing the likelihood of ASR and note-generation errors manyfold. We posit an urgent need to develop a standardized evaluation infrastructure to assess whether these systems are safe, reliable, and well-suited to the Indian healthcare setting. We substantiate our claims through a mixed-methods study -- a systematic survey of publicly available patient-clinician conversational datasets, a quantitative comparison of these datasets against conversational and cultural markers drawn from the Indian clinical-communication literature, and semi-structured interviews with five organizations building and deploying ACS in India and Africa. Our survey shows that there are no publicly available, large-scale, real-world benchmarks for ACS in India, with existing datasets being overwhelmingly synthetic. We note that the available Global North datasets diverge significantly from the expected conversational and cultural structures of Indian encounters. Finally, our interviews reveal that deploying organizations have each built proprietary, incomparable evaluation pipelines, creating a fragmented ecosystem with no independent and reliable basis for procurement. We call for the development of a publicly shared, real-world, multilingual benchmark for ACS evaluation and outline the properties and policies such a benchmark would require.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

A corpus-specific clinical RAG system matches or outperforms newer frontier LLMs on HealthBench

General-purpose large language models (LLMs) have recently been reported to match or exceed specialized clinical AI tools on medical benchmarks, but such comparisons draw on a narrow set of systems and on benchmarks developed largely in high-income settings. We evaluate VITA, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system purpose-built for contextual knowledge retrieval in India and other low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings. VITA retrieves from a curated corpus of disease-specific guidelines, India-specific antimicrobial resistance data, national formulary constraints, and resource-limited care protocols; its architecture and corpus are proprietary, but the benchmark, the physician-written rubrics, and our full response and scoring outputs are public for independent verification. On 4,023 English-language HealthBench questions (80.5% of the benchmark), scored with a GPT-4.1 judge, VITA ranked first with 51.9% of possible rubric points, ahead of GPT-5.4 (46.1%), o4-mini (44.3%), Gemini 3.1 Pro (42.6%), and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (37.3%), and scored highest on 45.4% of questions. To test robustness to newer models and judge lineage, a 500-question subset was re-run against current-generation models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.5 Pro, Grok 4.3) and graded by a neutral open-weight judge (DeepSeek-V4-Pro) sharing no lineage with any system tested. Here the gap narrowed to parity: VITA and GPT-5.5 were statistically indistinguishable on mean per-question score, while VITA led on points-weighted score and won the most questions. VITA's advantages in accuracy and completeness persisted under the neutral judge; its communication scores were lower. These results indicate that a purpose-built clinical RAG system remains competitive with frontier LLMs on an open benchmark, consistent with corpus specificity as a design variable that improves grounding at some cost to communication polish.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Radiology's Last Exam (RadLE): Benchmarking Frontier Multimodal AI Against Human Experts and a Taxonomy of Visual Reasoning Errors in Radiology

Generalist multimodal AI systems such as large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly accessed by clinicians and patients alike for medical image interpretation through widely available consumer-facing chatbots. Most evaluations claiming expert level performance are on public datasets containing common pathologies. Rigorous evaluation of frontier models on difficult diagnostic cases remains limited. We developed a pilot benchmark of 50 expert-level "spot diagnosis" cases across multiple imaging modalities to evaluate the performance of frontier AI models against board-certified radiologists and radiology trainees. To mirror real-world usage, the reasoning modes of five popular frontier AI models were tested through their native web interfaces, viz. OpenAI o3, OpenAI GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok-4, and Claude Opus 4.1. Accuracy was scored by blinded experts, and reproducibility was assessed across three independent runs. GPT-5 was additionally evaluated across various reasoning modes. Reasoning quality errors were assessed and a taxonomy of visual reasoning errors was defined. Board-certified radiologists achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (83%), outperforming trainees (45%) and all AI models (best performance shown by GPT-5: 30%). Reliability was substantial for GPT-5 and o3, moderate for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok-4, and poor for Claude Opus 4.1. These findings demonstrate that advanced frontier models fall far short of radiologists in challenging diagnostic cases. Our benchmark highlights the present limitations of generalist AI in medical imaging and cautions against unsupervised clinical use. We also provide a qualitative analysis of reasoning traces and propose a practical taxonomy of visual reasoning errors by AI models for better understanding their failure modes, informing evaluation standards and guiding more robust model development.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

MedVersa: A Generalist Foundation Model for Medical Image Interpretation

Current medical AI systems are often limited to narrow applications, hindering widespread adoption. We present MedVersa, a generalist foundation model trained on tens of millions of compiled medical instances. MedVersa unlocks generalist learning from multimodal inputs and outputs, representing the first example of a generalist model reaching competitive performance with leading specialized solutions across a variety of medical imaging scenarios. MedVersa achieves state-of-the-art performance in nine tasks, sometimes outperforming counterparts by over 10%. Radiologist evaluation shows MedVersa-generated reports get superior performance in 95% of normal studies, while matching or exceeding human reports in 71% of cases overall. User studies showed notable reductions in report writing time and discrepancies with the use of MedVersa. Our findings underscore the value of flexible, multimodal AI systems in advancing medical image interpretation and supporting clinical expertise.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Fine-Grained Rib Fracture Diagnosis with Hyperbolic Embeddings: A Detailed Annotation Framework and Multi-Label Classification Model

Accurate rib fracture identification and classification are essential for treatment planning. However, existing datasets often lack fine-grained annotations, particularly regarding rib fracture characterization, type, and precise anatomical location on individual ribs. To address this, we introduce a novel rib fracture annotation protocol tailored for fracture classification. Further, we enhance fracture classification by leveraging cross-modal embeddings that bridge radiological images and clinical descriptions. Our approach employs hyperbolic embeddings to capture the hierarchical nature of fracture, mapping visual features and textual descriptions into a shared non-Euclidean manifold. This framework enables more nuanced similarity computations between imaging characteristics and clinical descriptions, accounting for the inherent hierarchical relationships in fracture taxonomy. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods across multiple classification tasks, with average recall improvements of 6% on the AirRib dataset and 17.5% on the public RibFrac dataset.

cs.CV↗