arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Suraj Kumar Sahoo

Publications and source records attributed to Suraj Kumar Sahoo.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Boxicity of Power Graphs of Finite Nilpotent Groups

The \textit{boxicity} of an undirected graph $Γ$, denoted as $\operatorname{box}(Γ)$, is the smallest non-negative integer $d$ such that $Γ$ can be represented as the intersection graph of axis-parallel rectangular boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$. The \emph{power graph} of a group $G$, denoted as $\operatorname{Pow}(G)$, is an undirected graph whose vertex set is the group itself, with two elements being adjacent if one is a power of the other. We determine the exact boxicity of power graphs of finite nilpotent groups. For a cyclic group of order $n=\prod_{i=1}^{r}p_i^{e_i}>1$, where the $p_i$ are distinct primes, we prove that its power graph has boxicity $\sum_{i=1}^{r}e_i-\max_i e_i$. For a finite nilpotent group $G$, let the number of noncyclic odd Sylow subgroups be denoted by $t(G)$. If $G$ has odd order or if $G$ has a cyclic Sylow $2$-subgroup, then $\operatorname{box}(\operatorname{Pow}(G))=\operatorname{box}(\operatorname{Pow}(\mathbb{Z}_{\operatorname{exp}(G)}))+t(G)$, where $\operatorname{exp}(G)$ denotes the \emph{exponent} of a group $G$. When the Sylow $2$-subgroup is noncyclic, and the odd part is nontrivial, the boxicity equals this value or one more, and we characterise precisely when each of these values is attained. The boxicity of power graphs of arbitrary finite groups and the exact boxicity of the comparability graph of the Boolean lattice were posed as open questions in Discrete Mathematics, 349(7):115017, 2026. As a consequence of our results, we answer the latter question completely and the former question partially, by computing the exact boxicity of the power graphs of nilpotent groups.

cs.DM↗

Geometric Graph Representations via Compact SAT Encodings

We present compact SAT encodings and certifying exact solvers for boxicity and cubicity. The boxicity of a graph is the minimum dimension in which it is the intersection graph of axis-aligned boxes; cubicity is defined analogously using unit cubes. Grid-based formulations face a geometric discretization bottleneck, growing rapidly with the target dimension. We avoid this bottleneck by encoding the total order of interval endpoints in each coordinate. For an $n$-vertex graph and target dimension $d$, our boxicity encoding uses $O(n^2d)$ variables and $O(n^3d)$ clauses, both linear in $d$. Requiring the left- and right-endpoint orders to agree yields a cubicity encoding of the same asymptotic size. Satisfying models are decoded into independently checked geometric representations, while unsatisfiable instances used as lower-bound evidence carry mechanically verified DRAT certificates. In a controlled evaluation with 186 trials per encoding on standard and structured graph families, the order encoding solves 96.8% of trials, compared with 71.0% for the known grid formulation, and reduces mean PAR-2 time from 178.21 to 21.70 seconds. The pipeline also certifies exact values for several named graphs. We turn one such value into a reusable obstruction by proving that every Kneser graph $K(n,k)$ with $k\ge3$ and $n\ge2k+1$ contains an induced Desargues graph. The resulting lower bound, together with an explicit three-dimensional representation of $K(7,3)$, establishes $\operatorname{boxicity}(K(7,3))=3$. This disproves the conjecture of Caoduro and Sebo that $\operatorname{boxicity}(K(n,k))=n-k$ for all $k\ge3$ and $n\ge2k+1$.

cs.CG↗

Parameterized algorithms for representing graphs as intersections of threshold graphs

A graph is called a threshold graph if there is an assignment of real valued weights to its vertices such that two vertices have an edge between them if and only if the sum of the weights of the two vertices is above a certain `threshold value'. We will denote the class of all threshold graphs as $TH$. For a graph $G=(V,E)$, if for some integer $t\geq 0$, there are $t$ many threshold graphs $\{G_i=(V,E_i)\}_{i\in [t]}$ such that we have $E=E_1\cap E_2\cap \cdots \cap E_t$, then we say that the collection of threshold graphs $\{G_i=(V,E_i)\}_{i\in [t]}$ forms a $TH$-representation of $G$ of size $t$. \emph{The intersection dimension of $G$ with respect to threshold graphs} (denoted as $dim_{TH}(G)$) is the smallest non-negative integer $t$ such that there is a $TH$-representation of $G$ of size $t$. It is known that for a graph $G$ and integer $t>0$, the problem of deciding whether $dim_{TH}(G)\leq t$ is NP-complete even for $t=3$. In this paper, we study this problem in the framework of parameterized algorithms. We consider the vertex cover number and the cluster vertex deletion number as our parameters. We give a FPT algorithm for determining an optimal $TH$-representation of a graph when parameterized by its vertex cover number. Our main result is an efficient parameterized approximation scheme for this problem when parameterized by the cluster vertex deletion number of $G$.

cs.DS↗

Sharp quadratic $χ$-binding functions for powers of bipartite graphs

For every natural number $r\geq 2$, we construct $r^{th}$ powers of bipartite graphs whose chromatic number is quadratic in their clique number, showing that the straightforward quadratic upper bound is best possible. We thereby settle an open problem posed by Chakraborty, Chandran, Jacob and Pillai [J. Graph Theory 112(3) (2026), 235-254] by establishing the sharpness of the quadratic bound for squares of bipartite graphs.

math.CO↗

The boxicity of the compressed zero divisor graph of the ring of integers modulo N

The boxicity of a graph $G$, denoted by $box(G)$, is the minimum integer $d\geq 0$ such that $G$ is the intersection graph of axis-parallel boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$. The class of zero divisor graphs introduced by Beck (1988) is a popular class of graphs and has been studied extensively by several researchers. Suppose $Z(R)$ is the set of zero divisors of a ring $R$. The zero divisor graph $Γ(R)$ for a ring $R $ is defined as the graph with the vertex set $V(Γ(R))=Z(R)$ and $E(Γ(R))=\{\{x,y\}\colon x,y\in Z(R)\text{ with }x\neq y\text{ and }x y=0\}$. One can define an equivalence relation $\sim$ on $V(Γ(R))$ such that for vertices $x$ and $y$, one has $x\sim y$ if and only if $x$ and $y$ have the same annihilator, i.e., $Ann(x)=Ann(y)$. The compressed zero divisor graph $Γ_E(R)$ for a ring $R$ is the simple graph obtained from $Γ(R)$ by retaining exactly one vertex from each equivalence class induced by $\sim$. In this paper, we completely answer two open questions posed in Discrete Applied Mathematics 391 (2026), pp. 127-136. Let $N=\prod_{i=1}^a p_i^{n_i}$ be the prime factorization of a positive integer $N$ and let $\mathbb{Z}_N$ be the ring of integers modulo $N$. We determine the exact boxicity of the compressed zero divisor graph $Γ_E(\mathbb{Z}_N)$. We show that when $a\geq 2$, $box(Γ_E(\mathbb{Z}_N))= a-1$ if and only if one of the following is true: $(i)$ $a\geq 2$ and $N$ is the product of two coprime integers $x$ and $y$ such that $x$ is a square-free integer and $y$ is the cube of a prime number; $(ii)$ $a\geq 3$ and $N$ is square-free; $(iii)$ $a\geq 2$, $N$ is cube-free, not square-free, and contains at least one prime divisor $p_i$ such that $n_i=1$. If $a=2$ and $n_1=n_2=1$, then $Γ_{E}(\mathbb{Z}_N)$ is a clique, and so, $box(Γ_{E}(\mathbb{Z}_N))=0$. In all other cases, $box(Γ_{E}(\mathbb{Z}_N))=a$.

cs.DM↗

Learning Regularizers: Learning Optimizers that can Regularize

Learned Optimizers (LOs), a type of Meta-learning, have gained traction due to their ability to be parameterized and trained for efficient optimization. Traditional gradient-based methods incorporate explicit regularization techniques such as Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), Gradient-norm Aware Minimization (GAM), and Gap-guided Sharpness-Aware Minimization (GSAM) to enhance generalization and convergence. In this work, we explore a fundamental question: \textbf{Can regularizers be learned?} We empirically demonstrate that LOs can be trained to learn and internalize the effects of traditional regularization techniques without explicitly applying them to the objective function. We validate this through extensive experiments on standard benchmarks (including MNIST, FMNIST, CIFAR and Neural Networks such as MLP, MLP-Relu and CNN), comparing LOs trained with and without access to explicit regularizers. Regularized LOs consistently outperform their unregularized counterparts in terms of test accuracy and generalization. Furthermore, we show that LOs retain and transfer these regularization effects to new optimization tasks by inherently seeking minima similar to those targeted by these regularizers. Our results suggest that LOs can inherently learn regularization properties, \textit{challenging the conventional necessity of explicit optimizee loss regularization.

cs.LG↗

Boxicity of Zero Divisor Graphs

A $d$-dimensional box is the cartesian product $R_i\times\cdots\times R_d$ where each $R_i$ is a closed interval on the real line. The boxicity of a graph, denoted as $box(G)$, is the minimum integer $d\geq 0$ such that $G$ is the intersection graph of a collection of $d$-dimensional boxes. The study of graph classes associated with algebraic structures is a fascinating area where graph theory and algebra meet. A well-known class of graphs associated with rings is the class of zero divisor graphs introduced by Beck in 1988. Since then, this graph class has been studied extensively by several researchers. Denote by $Z(R)$ the set of zero divisors of a ring $R$. The zero divisor graph $Γ(R)$ for a ring $R$ is defined as the graph with the vertex set $V(Γ(R))=Z(R)$ and $E(Γ(R))=\{\{a_i,a_j\}:a_ia_j\in Z(R)\text{ and }a_ia_j=0 \}$. Let $N=Π_{i=1}^ap_i^{n_i}$ be the prime factorization of $N$. In Discrete Applied Mathematics 365 (2025), pp. 260-269, it was shown that $box(Γ(\mathbb{Z}_N))\leqΠ_{i=1}^a(n_i+1)-Π_{i=1}^a(\lfloor n_i/2\rfloor+1)-1$. In this paper we exactly determine the boxicity of $Γ(\mathbb{Z}_N)$: We show that when $N\equiv 2\pmod 4$ and $N$ is not divisible by $p^3$ for any prime divisor $p$, we have $box(Γ(\mathbb{Z}_N))=a-1$. Otherwise $box(Γ(\mathbb{Z}_N))=a$. Suppose $R$ is a non-zero commutative ring with identity that is also a reduced ring and let $k$ be the size of the set of minimal prime ideals of $R$. In the same paper, it was showed that $box(Γ(R))\leq 2^k-2$. We improve this result by showing $\lfloor k/2\rfloor\leq box(Γ(R))\leq k$ with the same assumption on $R$. In this paper we also show that $a-1\leq\dim_{TH}(Γ(\mathbb{Z}_N))\leq a$ and $\lfloor k/2\rfloor\leq\dim_{TH}(Γ(R))\leq k$, where $\dim_{TH}$ is another dimensional parameter associated with graphs known as the threshold dimension.

cs.DM↗