arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Subbarao Kambhampati

Publications and source records attributed to Subbarao Kambhampati.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Masked Distillation: Internalizing the Chain-of-Thought in Language Models

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) produce long, explicit chains of intermediate steps before generating a final answer at inference time. These intermediate traces dominate latency, memory usage, and serving cost, even though the final answer correctness is not causally related to the trace correctness and the trace length is not a reliable indicator of the problem complexity. This raises a natural question: can the computation expressed in these intermediate tokens be internalized into the parameters of a language model, enabling it to produce answers directly (or with much shorter intermediate traces)? We introduce \textit{masked distillation}, a knowledge-distillation framework in which a student LLM is trained to predict only the solution tokens conditioned on the question, while a reasoning teacher provides feedback on the student's responses after conditioning on the question and its own CoT trace. We instantiate this framework in two settings: (i) a \textit{self-distillation} setting, in which the same model serves as the teacher in thinking mode and as the student in non-thinking mode, and (ii) a \textit{dual-model} setting, in which a larger reasoning teacher supervises a separate smaller non-thinking student over the solution tokens. By treating intermediate tokens as a scaffold which reasoning models use to fit over the solution tokens, We additionally vary the length of intermediate-token scaffolding the student is supervised on, interpolating between full internalization (the student emits only the solution) and no internalization (the student emits the full trace before the answer). We evaluate the framework through controlled experiments on two reasoning domains: GSM8K (grade-school arithmetic) and Countdown (a number-puzzle search task).

cs.AI

A Mental Model Based Framework of Trust

Handling trust is a core requirement of effective interaction between people and AI agents. Thus, any decision-making framework designed to work with people must be able to estimate human trust. In this paper, we propose a mental model-based framework of trust that captures multidimensional aspects of trust and can be used to infer human trust. This framework can also be used as a foundation for any trust-aware decision-making framework. Through our mental model-based framework of trust, we propose a formal framework that captures intuitions about trust present in extant literature. We show how our framework captures various dimensions of trust perception and then use the framework to define trust evolution, human reliance, and decision-making. Additionally, we also propose a formalization of the appropriate level of trust in the agent. Using human subject studies, we evaluate if (1) changes in trust can be achieved by adjusting human beliefs about the agent according to predictions made by our mental model framework and (2) adjustments in human belief lead to corresponding modifications in trust perceptions; performance, process, and purpose, by controlling different aspects of the model.

cs.AI