arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Stephan Felber.
We investigate self-correcting gossip protocols with errors. In distributed computing, protocols with errors have been widely investigated in temporal epistemic logics. Instead, we propose a dynamic epistemic logic. We show how to correct transmission errors due to faulty messages without a central authority coordinating protocol execution, how this affects optimality, and how this compares to bounded memory and full information protocols.
We introduce a sheaf-theoretic characterization of task solvability in general distributed computing models, unifying distinct approaches to message-passing models. We establish cellular sheaves as a natural mathematical framework for analyzing the global consistency requirements of local computations. Our main contribution is a task sheaf construction that explicitly relates both the distributed system and task, in which terminating solutions are precisely its global sections. We prove that a task can only be solved by a system when such sections exist in a task sheaf obtained from an execution cut, the frontier in which processes have enough information to decide. Our characterization is model-independent, working under varying synchronicity, failures and message adversaries, as long as the model produces runs composed of global states of the system. Furthermore, we show that the cohomology of the task sheaf provides a linear algebraic description of the decision space of the processes, and encodes the obstructions to find solutions. This opens way to a computational approach to protocol synthesis, which we illustrated by deriving a protocol for approximate agreement. This work bridges distributed computing and sheaf theory, providing both theoretical foundations for analyzing task solvability and tools for protocol design leveraging computational topology.
In this paper, we provide a framework integrating distributed multi-robot systems and temporal epistemic logic. We show that continuous-discrete hybrid systems are compatible with logical models of knowledge already used in distributed computing, and demonstrate its usefulness by deriving sufficient epistemic conditions for exploration and gathering robot tasks to be solvable. We provide a separation of the physical and computational aspects of a robotic system, allowing us to decouple the problems related to each and directly use methods from control theory and distributed computing, fields that are traditionally distant in the literature. Finally, we demonstrate a novel approach for reasoning about the knowledge in multi-robot systems through a principled method of converting a switched hybrid dynamical system into a temporal-epistemic logic model, passing through an abstract state machine representation. This creates space for methods and results to be exchanged across the fields of control theory, distributed computing and temporal-epistemic logic, while reasoning about multi-robot systems.
We provide a complete characterization of the solvability/impossibility of deterministic stabilizing consensus in any computing model with benign process and communication faults using point-set topology. Relying on the topologies for infinite executions introduced by Nowak, Schmid and Winkler (JACM, 2024) for terminating consensus, we prove that semi-open decision sets and semi-continuous decision functions as introduced by Levin (AMM, 1963) are the appropriate means for this characterization: Unlike the decision functions for terminating consensus, which are continuous, semi-continuous functions do not require the inverse image of an open set to be open and hence allow to map a connected space to a disconnected one. We also show that multi-valued stabilizing consensus with weak and strong validity are equivalent, as is the case for terminating consensus. By applying our results to (variants of) all the known possibilities/impossibilities for stabilizing consensus, we easily provide a topological explanation of these results.
In this paper we provide a first-ever epistemic formulation of stabilizing agreement, defined as the non-terminating variant of the well established consensus problem. In stabilizing agreements, agents are given (possibly different) initial values, with the goal to eventually always decide on the same value. While agents are allowed to change their decisions finitely often, they are required to agree on the same value eventually. We capture these properties in temporal epistemic logic and we use the Runs and Systems framework to formally reason about stabilizing agreement problems. We then epistemically formalize the conditions for solving stabilizing agreement, and identify the knowledge that the agents acquire during any execution to choose a particular value under our system assumptions. This first formalization of a sufficient condition for solving stabilizing agreement sets the stage for a planned necessary and sufficient epistemic characterization of stabilizing agreement.
A substantial portion of distributed computing research is dedicated to terminating problems like consensus and similar agreement problems. However, non-terminating problems have been intensively studied in the context of self-stabilizing distributed algorithms, where processes may start from arbitrary initial states and can tolerate arbitrary transient faults. In between lie stabilizing problems, where the processes start from a well-defined initial state, but do not need to decide irrevocably and are allowed to change their decision finitely often until a stable decision is eventually reached. In this paper, we introduce the novel Delayed Lossy-Link (DLL) model, and the Lossy Iterated Immediate Snapshot Model (LIIS), for which we show stabilizing consensus to be impossible. The DLL model is introduced as a variant of the well-known Lossy-Link model, which admits silence periods of arbitrary but finite length. The LIIS model is a variant of the Iterated Immediate Snapshot (IIS), model which admits finite length periods of at most $f$ omission faults per layer. In particular, we show that stabilizing consensus is impossible even when $f=1$. Our results show that even in a model with very strong connectivity, namely, the Iterated Immediate Snapshot (IIS) model, a single omission fault per layer effectively disables stabilizing consensus. Furthermore, since the DLL model always has a perpetual broadcaster, the mere existence of a perpetual broadcaster, even in a crash-free setting, is not sufficient for solving stabilizing consensus, negatively answering the open question posed by Charron-Bost and Moran.