arXiv subjects

Sinjini Banerjee

Publications and source records attributed to Sinjini Banerjee.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Measuring consistency via ensemble margin and local prediction variability: Auditing decision systems in the presence of predictive multiplicity

The Rashomon effect is a machine learning phenomenon where equally accurate models produce different predictions for the same inputs (predictive multiplicity). Existing work primarily focuses on multiplicity within individual models, but in more complex decision systems, the impact of the Rashomon effect is less well understood. In this work, we study multiplicity from the perspective of auditing incorrect ensemble predictions, where the decision to divert an instance for human review is based on a consistency criterion that combines the ensemble margin with a measure of local prediction variability for each constituent model. With mild assumptions about stability and smoothness, we show that the consistency scores of finite ensembles converge to the corresponding consistency score of the expected model from the Rashomon set as the ensemble size and the number of samples used to measure local prediction variability increase. To demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed criterion, we evaluate the framework with respect to transformer models applied to natural language understanding tasks and parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models used for tabular data classification tasks. Our experiments show that ensembling models from the Rashomon set substantially reduces the risk of incorrect predictions going unchecked compared with auditing a single model, while incurring only a moderate increase in the number of diversions. Moreover, the auditing behavior of the full Rashomon set can be closely approximated by finite ensembles of relatively modest size, with the risk approaching zero for some datasets. We further demonstrate that the proposed measure exhibits stronger agreement with established predictive multiplicity metrics than existing consistency measures, providing a more reliable way to capture multiplicity in the Rashomon set.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2024

Measuring training variability from stochastic optimization using robust nonparametric testing

Deep neural network training often involves stochastic optimization, meaning each run will produce a different model. This implies that hyperparameters of the training process, such as the random seed itself, can potentially have significant influence on the variability in the trained models. Measuring model quality by summary statistics, such as test accuracy, can obscure this dependence. We propose a robust hypothesis testing framework and a novel summary statistic, the $\alpha$-trimming level, to measure model similarity. Applying hypothesis testing directly with the $\alpha$-trimming level is challenging because we cannot accurately describe the distribution under the null hypothesis. Our framework addresses this issue by determining how closely an approximate distribution resembles the expected distribution of a group of individually trained models and using this approximation as our reference. We then use the $\alpha$-trimming level to suggest how many training runs should be sampled to ensure that an ensemble is a reliable representative of the true model performance. We also show how to use the $\alpha$-trimming level to measure model variability and demonstrate experimentally that it is more expressive than performance metrics like validation accuracy, churn, or expected calibration error when taken alone. An application of fine-tuning over random seed in transfer learning illustrates the advantage of our new metric.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2023

Robust Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing to Understand Variability in Training Neural Networks

Training a deep neural network (DNN) often involves stochastic optimization, which means each run will produce a different model. Several works suggest this variability is negligible when models have the same performance, which in the case of classification is test accuracy. However, models with similar test accuracy may not be computing the same function. We propose a new measure of closeness between classification models based on the output of the network before thresholding. Our measure is based on a robust hypothesis-testing framework and can be adapted to other quantities derived from trained models.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2019

Robust Hierarchical-Optimization RLS Against Sparse Outliers

This paper fortifies the recently introduced hierarchical-optimization recursive least squares (HO-RLS) against outliers which contaminate infrequently linear-regression models. Outliers are modeled as nuisance variables and are estimated together with the linear filter/system variables via a sparsity-inducing (non-)convexly regularized least-squares task. The proposed outlier-robust HO-RLS builds on steepest-descent directions with a constant step size (learning rate), needs no matrix inversion (lemma), accommodates colored nominal noise of known correlation matrix, exhibits small computational footprint, and offers theoretical guarantees, in a probabilistic sense, for the convergence of the system estimates to the solutions of a hierarchical-optimization problem: Minimize a convex loss, which models a-priori knowledge about the unknown system, over the minimizers of the classical ensemble LS loss. Extensive numerical tests on synthetically generated data in both stationary and non-stationary scenarios showcase notable improvements of the proposed scheme over state-of-the-art techniques.

cs.LG↗