Simba Shi | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Biased-Noise Quantum Reed-Solomon Codes and a Tornado Concatenation for Cat Qubits

Dissipative cat qubits exponentially suppress one Pauli error channel with the mean photon number, leaving the conjugate bit-flip error as the dominant failure mode. This strong noise bias makes the full machinery of general quantum error correction unnecessary: a code need only protect against a single error type, and any classical linear code can be promoted to a Clifford stabilizer code that does exactly this. We use this observation to build a bit-flip-only quantum Reed-Solomon (RS) code. Starting from the maximum-distance-separable RS code [7, 3, 5] over GF($2^3$), we binary-expand it to the linear code [21, 9, 6] over GF(2) and realize it as a [[21, 9, $d_X = 6, d_Z = 1$]] bit-flip code whose stabilizers are products of $Z$ operators. Because no phase-flip correction is attempted, the construction discards the redundancy that standard quantum RS codes spend on correcting $Z$ errors -- which a strongly biased cat qubit renders unnecessary -- and yields a shallow Clifford circuit that samples directly in Stim. Errors are decoded by an optimal bounded-distance syndrome-lookup table. We then introduce a Tornado architecture: a two-layer concatenation that wraps every position of the outer RS code in an inner distance-three repetition code, yielding a [[63, 9, 18]] code decoded by a two-stage inner majority vote and outer lookup decoder. Monte-Carlo simulation shows that at a physical bit-flip rate $p = 0.1$ the Tornado code reaches a logical error rate $p_L \approx 5.3 \times 10^{-3}$, below both parent codes, and that its logical error rate scales as $p_L \propto p^6$ at low $p$, in contrast to $p^2$ for the repetition code and $p^3$ for the standalone RS code. We give the exact construction, the error and circuit model, an asymptotic scaling analysis, and an honest account of the overhead cost and single-shot assumptions.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Prediction Is Not Physics: Learning and Evaluating Conserved Quantities in Neural Simulators

A diffusion model trained on Hamiltonian trajectories can achieve rollout MSE near $10^{-3}$, but the standard deviation of its energy over time is between 7500 and 36000 times larger than the ground-truth energy standard deviation, indicating a failure to preserve conservation laws. This gap motivates our central question of whether neural networks can learn or select globally conserved quantities from physical trajectories. We investigate this across three Hamiltonian systems: projectile motion, pendulum, and spring-mass. We use a structured $T(v)+V(q)$ energy model, a black-box Conservation Discovery Network (CDN), a polynomial CDN, and a conditional diffusion baseline. The structured network reaches $R^2 \geq 0.9999$ against analytical energy on clean data, while the black-box CDN reaches $R^2 \geq 0.996$ when trained with temporal consistency plus a small alignment loss to analytical energy at $t=0$ ($\lambda_{\mathrm{align}}=0.2$). With $\lambda_{\mathrm{align}}=0$, CDN Pearson $R^2$ collapses on pendulum and spring-mass ($< 10^{-3}$), showing that temporal consistency alone is not enough to reliably identify the true energy. Under $1\%$ additive Gaussian noise, the CDN outperforms the structured model on the projectile and spring-mass systems, suggesting that the CDN may be more robust to noisy inputs in this setting. However, the polynomial CDN is sensitive to training configuration: it achieves $R^2=0.78$ under a short training schedule on the pendulum system, but reaches $R^2=0.9998$ with more training time and data, regardless of whether noise is added.

cs.LG↗