arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Siddharth Patel

Publications and source records attributed to Siddharth Patel.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

AI Hardware Accelerators for Large Language Models: Architectures and the Memory Wall

Large language models (LLMs) place unprecedented and still-growing demands on the hardware that trains and serves them. This review surveys the full landscape of AI hardware accelerators for LLMs, including general-purpose GPUs, custom ASICs such as TPUs, Trainium, Groq, and Cerebras, reconfigurable FPGAs, processing-in-memory and near-memory architectures, and emerging neuromorphic and photonic approaches across cloud and edge deployment. Using the transformer's computational structure and roofline analysis as a common framework, we show that the decisive constraint on LLM acceleration is not arithmetic but memory: the autoregressive decode phase is bandwidth-bound, the key-value cache can rival the model weights in size, and data movement dominates energy. Comparing platforms on compute, memory, energy, programmability, and scalability, we find that no single architecture is optimal across workloads: GPUs remain the flexible default and the workhorse of training; domain-specific ASICs win at scale for stable, high-volume workloads; processing-in-memory is the most promising near-term response to the memory wall, entering systems as a heterogeneous complement; and neuromorphic and photonic computing, while promising, are not yet production-ready at frontier scale. Future progress depends on hardware-algorithm co-design and heterogeneous, memory-centric systems: for large language models, the memory system has become the computer.

cs.AR

PolyComp: A Polycube-based Benchmark for Compositional 3D Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Models

We introduce PolyComp, a procedurally generated and verified benchmark that stresses visual recognition and compositional spatial reasoning. In each problem, a model must identify which of four options shows a pair of polycube components that can be combined to form a target solid. The benchmark contains 120 problems across four geometry families, and each problem has three different presentation formats using either a single image or multiple images. The random guessing baseline is 25%. Across the three presentations (360 presented problems per model), GPT-5.6 Sol with max effort attains 50.0% accuracy (95% problem-cluster CI 43.3-56.7%) at a mean cost of \$0.951 per presented problem, Claude Fable 5 with max effort attains 39.4% (33.1-46.1%) at \$0.701, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview with thinking level high attains 27.5% (22.8-32.5%), near the 25% random guessing baseline, at \$0.350. The observed accuracy spread across geometry families is larger than across presentation formats. We present a problem development and evaluation protocol, cost and token accounting, and release the 120 problems.

cs.CV