arXiv subjects

Shuguang Yang

Publications and source records attributed to Shuguang Yang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Surf_2_Volume: a workflow for converting CIFTI parcellations to NIfTI volume space

Many neuroimaging programs require volumetric NIfTI files and cannot directly use parcellations stored in CIFTI format. We developed Surf_2_Volume, a workflow that uses Connectome Workbench, FreeSurfer, AFNI/SUMA, neuromaps, and Python to convert categorical CIFTI parcellations into NIfTI volumes. Cortical labels are transferred through fsaverage to a surface representation of the MNI152 template and assigned to voxels within a smoothed cortical ribbon mask. A threshold controls how much of this mask is included. We tested twelve thresholds with the Schaefer2018 atlas with 100 parcels and 7 networks, which is available as both an fsLR representation and a published FSL MNI152 1 mm volume. We compared each converted volume with the published reference and with standard Workbench ribbon and nearest-vertex mappings. At threshold 0.05, Surf_2_Volume had higher scores on the two measures of parcel overlap, Dice and Jaccard, than the best Workbench setting (0.729 vs. 0.709 and 0.580 vs. 0.556, respectively). It also left fewer reference voxels unlabeled (11.88% vs. 20.57%) and assigned fewer labels outside the reference (9.43% vs. 11.22%). Among the tested Surf_2_Volume thresholds, 0.05 also produced the lowest average parcel volume distortion. Surf_2_Volume provides a tunable and reproducible workflow for generating volumetric atlases from CIFTI parcellations when volume-based analyses are required.

q-bio.QM↗

arXiv2026

Predictive and feedback signals differently shape the formation of group-level and individualized language representations

Adults vary greatly in how effectively they learn a new language, but the signals driving the learning processes and individual differences remain unclear. Over seven days, we tracked behavioral learning and collected fMRI data from 102 adults as they learned an artificial language with corrective feedback. We trained matched transformer models with prediction, feedback, or combined objectives and compared their internal representations to brain activity. Representations derived from the prediction-focused model accounted for the largest share of unique neural variance at the group level, despite the human task being feedback-based. Throughout model training, both objectives showed a shift in brain-model alignment from sensory to higher-order language and associative networks, indicating abstraction processing. Conversely, neural patterns related to the feedback model were most useful for predicting individual generalization outcomes on Day 7. These findings support a multi-signal model of adult language learning, in which prediction shapes a common neural learning architecture across learners, whereas feedback-related mechanisms better explain individual differences over time.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2025

Multi-network Topology Underlying Individual Language Learning Success

Adult language learning varies greatly among individuals. Traditionally associated with frontotemporal language regions, this variability is increasingly seen as stemming from distributed brain networks. However, the role of these networks and their topological organization in explaining these differences remains unclear. We hypothesize that graph-theory-based network analysis of intrinsic multimodal connectivities across multiple networks explains overall and component-specific variations in language learning. We tested this in 101 healthy adults who underwent resting-state fMRI, structural MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging before seven days of six artificial language training tasks. We identified one dominant general learning component shared across tasks and five task-specific ones. Cross-validated predictive models used multimodal multi-network graph-theoretic metrics to predict final learning outcomes (LO) and rates (LR). We significantly predicted the LO and LR of the general component, which were primarily contributed by dorsal attention and frontoparietal networks. Nodal local efficiency was the most consistent predictor, with additional contributions from node clustering coefficient and network centrality for LR, highlighting local robustness, mesoscale network segregation, and global influence in explaining individual differences. Only task-specific word learning LO was predictable, relying on default mode and frontoparietal hubs with high betweenness centrality and efficiency. These findings demonstrate that intrinsic network topologies underlie differences in language learning success, supporting a multiple-systems hypothesis in which attentional-control networks interact with default and subcortical systems to shape learning trajectories. This advances mechanistic understanding and paves the way for personalized language education.

q-bio.NC↗