Equivalence Between Continuous-Time Risk-Sensitive Control and R\'enyi Divergence Minimization
In this study, we show that a continuous-time risk-sensitive control problem is equivalent to a R\'enyi divergence minimization problem over trajectory path measures. Reformulating stochastic optimal control as probabilistic inference via Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence minimization avoids the computational intractability of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. However, standard KL control is inherently risk-neutral, and recent minimax extensions remain restricted to risk-averse settings. Our equivalence result resolves this limitation by offering a unified probabilistic framework for arbitrary risk attitudes in continuous-time nonlinear systems. Based on Girsanov theorem, we explicitly map the risk sensitivity to the R\'enyi divergence order, deriving a noise-dependent control penalty scaled by risk preference. This formulation seamlessly modulates tail-weighting behaviors, interpolating between zero-forcing for risk-averse policies and mass-covering for risk-seeking policies. These findings bridge stochastic control and information-theoretic inference, providing a foundation for sampling-based control algorithms.