arXiv subjects

Sharath Chandra Guntuku

Publications and source records attributed to Sharath Chandra Guntuku.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Predictors of Loneliness in Older Adults Using Multimodal Analysis of Speech and Language

Loneliness is a critical public health issue among older adults, linked to higher risks of depression, cognitive decline, and mortality. Scalable, objective methods for its detection remain limited, particularly in natural conversational contexts. We analyzed speech and language markers of loneliness in 310 older adults using semi-structured telephone interviews to help understand how they process feeling lonely and how their language differs at different levels of feeling loneliness. Our multimodal framework combined linguistic features (psycholinguistic dictionaries, n-grams, and topic models) with acoustic features (pitch, tone, loudness) to examine associations with self-reported loneliness scores. Both predefined and data-driven methods captured patterns in verbal content and vocal delivery. Higher loneliness was associated with negations(r = 0.11), negative tone(r = 0.12), and conflict-related language. Lower loneliness was linked to social references(r = -0.18), motivational drives(r = -0.11), and emotional richness in speech(r = -0.12). We also found that the multimodal model (r = 0.298) outperforms the text-only and audio-only models. Findings suggest that loneliness manifests through both linguistic and acoustic cues, supporting the potential of speech-based analysis in psychological assessments and as an early indicator of emotional loneliness when used alongside existing assessments, rather than as standalone diagnostic tools.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Real-Time Deadlines Reveal Fragile Temporal Adaptation in LLM Strategic Dialogues

Large Language Models (LLMs) generate text token-by-token in discrete time, yet real-world communication, from therapy sessions to business negotiations, critically depends on continuous time constraints. We use simulated negotiations between paired agents under strict deadlines to study adaptation to real-time pressure. Agents either receive only the initial deadline or explicit remaining-time updates at each turn. Remaining-time feedback raises deal closure from 4% to 32% for GPT-5.1-chat-latest and increases offer acceptance more than sixfold. The same model achieves near-perfect closure under turn-based limits, showing that poor wall-clock performance is not simply due to insufficient negotiation competence. Across additional interface conditions, qualitative urgency cues can outperform numeric countdowns, repeated deadline reminders do not consistently reproduce their benefits, and directed time tracking can help or hurt depending on the model. Across additional negotiation scenarios and model configurations, we find real-time temporal adaptation is fragile, model-dependent, and sensitive to how temporal constraints are presented. Code available at https://github.com/sehgal-neil/llm-temporal-awareness

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Different Demographic Cues Yield Inconsistent Conclusions About LLM Personalization and Bias

Demographic cue-based evaluation is widely used to study how large language models (LLMs) adapt their responses to signaled demographic attributes within and across groups. This approach typically relies on a single cue (e.g., names) as a proxy for group membership, implicitly treating different cues as interchangeable operationalizations of a single underlying identity-conditioned behavior. We test this assumption in realistic advice-seeking interactions spanning 14.8 million prompts, focusing on race and gender in a U.S. context. We find that cues for the same group induce only partially overlapping changes in model responses, yielding inconsistent conclusions about personalization, while bias conclusions are unstable, with both magnitude and direction of group differences varying across cues. We further show that these inconsistencies reflect differences in cue-group association strength and linguistic features bundled within cues that shape model responses. Together, our findings suggest that demographic conditioning in LLMs is not a cue-invariant category-level parameter but depends fundamentally on how identity is cued, reflecting responses to linguistic signals rather than stable demographic categories. We therefore call for multi-cue, mechanism-aware evaluations as a foundation for robust and interpretable claims about demographic variation in LLM responses.

cs.CL↗