arXiv subjects

Shan Qu

Publications and source records attributed to Shan Qu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Power Echoes: Investigating Moderation Biases in Online Power-Asymmetric Conflicts

Online power-asymmetric conflicts are prevalent, and most platforms rely on human moderators to conduct moderation currently. Previous studies have been continuously focusing on investigating human moderation biases in different scenarios, while moderation biases under power-asymmetric conflicts remain unexplored. Therefore, we aim to investigate the types of power-related biases human moderators exhibit in power-asymmetric conflict moderation (RQ1) and further explore the influence of AI's suggestions on these biases (RQ2). For this goal, we conducted a mixed design experiment with 50 participants by leveraging the real conflicts between consumers and merchants as a scenario. Results suggest several biases towards supporting the powerful party within these two moderation modes. AI assistance alleviates most biases of human moderation, but also amplifies a few. Based on these results, we propose several insights into future research on human moderation and human-AI collaborative moderation systems for power-asymmetric conflicts.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Fast-Slow Thinking RM: Efficient Integration of Scalar and Generative Reward Models

Reward models (RMs) are critical for aligning Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). While Generative Reward Models (GRMs) achieve superior accuracy through chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, they incur substantial computational costs. Conversely, Scalar Reward Models (SRMs) offer efficiency but suffer from limited performance and adaptability in complex scenarios. We introduce Fast-Slow Thinking Reward Models (F/S-RM), a hybrid RM architecture inspired by Dual Process Theory. It trains a single model to integrate two distinct reward paradigms: first-token prediction as a scalar score (fast thinking) and CoT-based judgment (slow thinking), regulated by a dual-confidence activation mechanism that determines when to activate slow thinking. F/S-RM achieves a 1.2% relative performance improvement over state-of-the-art models while reducing token consumption by 20.8%. Code and data will be publicly available.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2020

Joint Inference on Truth/Rumor and Their Sources in Social Networks

In the contemporary era of information explosion, we are often faced with the mixture of massive \emph{truth} (true information) and \emph{rumor} (false information) flooded over social networks. Under such circumstances, it is very essential to infer whether each claim (e.g., news, messages) is a truth or a rumor, and identify their \emph{sources}, i.e., the users who initially spread those claims. While most prior arts have been dedicated to the two tasks respectively, this paper aims to offer the joint inference on truth/rumor and their sources. Our insight is that a joint inference can enhance the mutual performance on both sides. To this end, we propose a framework named SourceCR, which alternates between two modules, i.e., \emph{credibility-reliability training} for truth/rumor inference and \emph{division-querying} for source detection, in an iterative manner. To elaborate, the former module performs a simultaneous estimation of claim credibility and user reliability by virtue of an Expectation Maximization algorithm, which takes the source reliability outputted from the latter module as the initial input. Meanwhile, the latter module divides the network into two different subnetworks labeled via the claim credibility, and in each subnetwork launches source detection by applying querying of theoretical budget guarantee to the users selected via the estimated reliability from the former module. The proposed SourceCR is provably convergent, and algorithmic implementable with reasonable computational complexity. We empirically validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework in both synthetic and real datasets, where the joint inference leads to an up to 35\% accuracy of credibility gain and 29\% source detection rate gain compared with the separate counterparts.

cs.SI↗