arXiv subjects

Shalini Chakraborty

Publications and source records attributed to Shalini Chakraborty.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Case for Vibe Modeling: A Missing Step in AI-Based Trustworthy Software Development

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate software artifacts from natural language prompts. While this enables rapid prototyping and lowers the barrier to software creation, it also introduces challenges related to understanding, validation, traceability, and trust. In this paper, we argue that current AI-based development practices focus too heavily on the direct generation of code and insufficiently on intermediate representations that preserve human intent and support reasoning about system behavior. We argue for vibe modeling as a lightweight intermediate abstraction between natural language interaction and code generation. To explore its potential, we present a student survey study that examines perceptions of LLM output understanding, validation effort, trust and the perceived usefulness of vibe modeling across several AI-assisted development scenarios. Our results are intended to inform future studies for trustworthy and explainable AI-based software engineering via vibe modeling.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Motivations and Barriers to Communicating Software Engineering Research: Insights from Early Career Researchers

Science communication is increasingly becoming a part of modern research careers, involving researchers to disseminate knowledge, engage broader communities, and increase the societal impact of their work. Despite its growing importance, little is known about how early-career software engineering researchers perceive and navigate science communication in practice. In this paper, we investigate how PhD students in software engineering experience science communication. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 doctoral candidates from diverse international backgrounds. Using thematic analysis, we examine three interconnected dimensions: motivations, communication channels, and barriers. Our findings reveal a strong tension between aspiration and practice. Participants were highly motivated to engage in science communication due to opportunities for collaboration, professional recognition, broader impact, and advocacy for themselves and their research. However, translating these motivations into action was frequently constrained by social anxiety, uncertainty regarding appropriate audiences and communication venues, limited feedback mechanisms, insufficient institutional guidance, and challenges associated with navigating an increasingly fragmented communication landscape. Our findings highlight the need for tailored, balanced support systems that empower software engineering PhD students to engage in science communication effectively and confidently across diverse cultural and institutional environments. We outline practical implications that offer initial guidance for addressing these challenges in future work.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Prompts Blend Requirements and Solutions: From Intent to Implementation

AI coding assistants are fundamentally reshaping software development by shifting developers' effort from writing code toward specifying intent through natural language prompts. In emerging chat-based development practices such as vibe coding, prompts mediate the transformation of human intent into executable software. While Requirements Engineering (RE) emphasizes capturing, validating, and evolving requirements, current prompting practices remain informal and ad hoc. In this vision paper, we argue that prompts represent lightweight, evolving requirements artifacts that combine expressions of user needs with varying degrees of solution guidance. We use an existing conceptual model that decomposes prompts into three interrelated dimensions: Functionality and Quality (capturing intended system requirements), General Solutions (capturing architectural strategies and technology choices), and Specific Solutions (capturing implementation-level constraints and directives). Building on this conceptualization, we formulate four research hypotheses concerning (i) the evolution of prompts over time, (ii) the influence of user characteristics on prompt evolution, (iii) the relationship between prompt content and requirements validation and verification activities, and (iv) the impact of prompt characteristics on requirements and resulting software quality. We envision an empirical research agenda combining real-world AI-assisted development data, corpus analysis, and controlled experimentation to investigate these hypotheses and derive evidence-based practices for requirements-aware prompt engineering. By reframing prompts through the lens of RE, we position prompting not merely as an interaction mechanism with AI systems, but as a central software engineering concern requiring systematic study.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Trusting AI to increase productivity? Perspectives Across the Global North and South

Generative AI (GenAI) tools are widely used in academia and software development, where productivity gains may depend not only on technical capabilities but also on users' trust and contextual factors. This paper presents emerging results from an exploratory study investigating the relationship between trust in GenAI and perceived productivity, motivated by Global South contexts. We conducted a systematic literature review, complemented by a grey literature analysis and a survey study. The literature review identified no peer-reviewed evidence at the intersection of GenAI trust, productivity, and Global South settings, while the grey literature revealed only limited insights. At the time of writing, the survey has received 36 valid responses from participants across both the Global North and Global South, including individuals with cross-regional experiences. Preliminary results suggest that respondents born and working in the Global South tended to trust AI more, but did not usually report clear productivity gains from using it. In contrast, respondents born and working outside the Global South reported stronger productivity gains and greater time savings, even though they showed less trust in generative AI. These findings suggest that trusting AI is not enough on its own; productivity also depends on access, the type of task, and how much users need to check the output.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

The Prompt Triangle: A Registered Report on Prompts as Hybrid Artifacts

AI-based coding assistants are transforming software development by shifting effort from writing code to crafting prompts that guide code generation. Despite their growing importance, little empirical evidence exists on how prompts function as software engineering artifacts. Building on prior work framing prompts as mixed artifacts combining requirement intent and solution guidance, we build on the Prompt Triangle, a conceptual model describing prompts along three components: Functionality and Quality (requirements), General Solutions (architectural guidance), and Specific Solutions (implementation constraints). This registered report presents the Stage 1 protocol for a confirmatory study investigating how prompts evolve and how their alignment with requirements engineering (RE) activities predicts development outcomes. We preregister four hypotheses examining prompt evolution, developer characteristics, RE activity alignment, and temporal patterns. We employ a controlled experiment (n=30), community uploads, and mined data using dual-coding to test whether prompting patterns predict development success.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Domain Diversity, Motivation, Inclusion, and Feedback in Software Modelling Education

Student engagement is critical for effective learning in software modelling, yet fostering motivation and inclusivity remains a challenge. While existing research has focused on modelling tools, notations, and assessment, little attention has been given to how the choice of problem domains and the diversity, relatability, and cultural perspectives they bring shape students' learning experiences. This study explores how problem domains and teaching methods influence motivation, engagement, inclusiveness, and feedback in modelling education. To investigate these dimensions, we conducted parallel surveys with 90 students and 22 educators. Our findings reveal disconnects between educator assumptions and student preferences: Students show greatest motivation for socially relevant domains and prefer choice in selection, while educators overestimate interest in study-related domains. The study identifies how minor design choices can exclude students. Students perceive feedback as meaningful when visibly acted upon. These findings suggest inclusive domain selection is central to student motivation; thus, we recommend student-centred domain selection.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

3C: Competition, Competence, and Collaboration for Women in Computing

Women in computer science and software engineering continue to face structural and cultural barriers affecting recognition, collaboration, and career progression. Existing environments often reinforce competition, tokenism, and exclusion, particularly in male dominated academic and professional spaces. This extended abstract introduces the 3C framework Competition, Competence, and Collaboration to explore how women experience and navigate networking in computing environments. We discuss how perceptions of competence, access to collaborative networks, and competition for limited opportunities shape womens' participation and sense of belonging. As a call to action, we propose community driven discussions, focus groups, and participatory data collection within the ACM womENcourage community to better understand and address these challenges. Our goal is to foster stronger networks of mentorship, solidarity, and collaboration among women in computing.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Breaking In and Reaching Out: Networking for Women in Computer Science

Networking is central to careers in computer science, where a globally distributed and diverse community increasingly collaborates across institutional and geographic boundaries, often in hybrid and remote settings. However, access to effective networking is shaped by structural and personal factors, including geography, funding, language, identity, personality, and caregiving responsibilities. Building on prior work, this workshop focuses on women in computing to examine lived experiences of networking and the barriers they encounter. Through a community-driven discussion grounded in a factor-based framework, the workshop aims to surface overlooked challenges and foster shared understanding. Ultimately, it seeks to inform more inclusive, equitable, and accessible networking practices within the computer science community.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

On the Need to Rethink Trust in AI Assistants for Software Development: A Critical Review

Trust is a fundamental concept in human decision-making and collaboration that has long been studied in philosophy and psychology. However, software engineering (SE) articles often use the term trust informally; providing an explicit definition or embedding results in established trust models is rare. In SE research on AI assistants, this practice culminates in equating trust with the likelihood of accepting generated content, which, in isolation, does not capture the full conceptual complexity of trust. Without a common definition, true secondary research on trust is impossible. The objectives of our research were: (1) to present the psychological and philosophical foundations of human trust, (2) to systematically study how trust is conceptualized in SE and the related disciplines human-computer interaction and information systems, and (3) to discuss limitations of equating trust with content acceptance, outlining how SE research can adopt existing trust models to overcome the widespread informal use of the term trust. We conducted a literature review across disciplines and a critical review of recent SE articles with a focus on trust conceptualizations. We found that trust is rarely defined or conceptualized in SE articles. Related disciplines commonly embed their methodology and results in established trust models, clearly distinguishing, for example, between initial trust and trust formation and between appropriate and inappropriate trust. On a meta-scientific level, other disciplines even discuss whether and when trust can be applied to AI assistants at all. Our study reveals a significant maturity gap of trust research in SE compared to other disciplines. We provide concrete recommendations on how SE researchers can adopt established trust models and instruments to study trust in AI assistants beyond the acceptance of generated software artifacts.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Struggling to Connect: A Researchers' Reflection on Networking in Software Engineering

Networking is central to the growth and visibility of software engineering research and researchers. However, opportunities and capacities to build such networks are not easily identified and often are unevenly distributed. While networking is often viewed as an individual skill, a researchers workplace, culture and environment significantly influence their motivation and, consequently, the networks they form. This paper explores how factors such as country of residence, immigration status, language, gender, and surrounding context affect researchers' ability to establish professional connections and succeed within the global research ecosystem. Drawing on existing literature and personal experience, this reflective report examines the often-invisible barriers to networking and advocates for a community-driven "expert voice" initiative to acknowledge and address these inequities.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Staying or Leaving? How Job Satisfaction, Embeddedness and Antecedents Predict Turnover Intentions of Software Professionals

Context: Voluntary turnover is common in the software industry, increasing recruitment and onboarding costs and the risk of losing organizational and tacit knowledge. Objective: This study investigates how job satisfaction, work-life balance, job embeddedness, and their antecedents, including job quality, personality traits, attitudes toward technical and sociotechnical infrastructure, and perceptions of organizational justice, relate to software professionals' turnover intentions. Method: We conducted a geographically diverse cross-sectional survey of software professionals (N = 224) and analyzed the data using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Our model includes both reflective and formative constructs and tests 15 hypotheses grounded in occupational psychology and software engineering literature. Results: Job satisfaction and embeddedness were significantly negatively associated with software professionals' turnover intentions, while work-life balance showed no direct effect. The strongest antecedents for job satisfaction were work-life balance and job quality, while organizational justice was the strongest predictor of job embeddedness. Discussion: The resulting PLS-SEM model has considerably higher explanatory power for key outcome variables than previous work conducted in the software development context, highlighting the importance of both psychological (e.g., job satisfaction, job embeddedness) and organizational (e.g., organizational justice, job quality) factors in understanding turnover intentions of software professionals. Our results imply that improving job satisfaction and job embeddedness is the key to retaining software professionals. In turn, enhancing job quality, supporting work-life balance, and ensuring high organizational justice can improve job satisfaction and embeddedness, indirectly reducing turnover intentions.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

The Software Infrastructure Attitude Scale (SIAS): A Questionnaire Instrument for Measuring Professionals' Attitudes Toward Technical and Sociotechnical Infrastructure

Context: Recent software engineering (SE) research has highlighted the need for sociotechnical research, implying a demand for customized psychometric scales. Objective: We define the concepts of technical and sociotechnical infrastructure in software engineering, and develop and validate a psychometric scale that measures attitudes toward them. Method: Grounded in theories of infrastructure, attitudes, and prior work on psychometric measurement, we defined the target constructs and generated scale items. The scale was administered to 225 software professionals and evaluated using a split sample. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on one half of the sample to uncover the underlying factor structure and performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on the other half to validate the structure. Further analyses with the whole sample assessed face, criterion-related, and discriminant validity. Results: EFA supported a two-factor structure (technical and sociotechnical infrastructure), accounting for 65% of the total variance with strong loadings. CFA confirmed excellent model fit. Face and content validity were supported by the item content reflecting cognitive, affective, and behavioral components. Both subscales were correlated with job satisfaction, perceived autonomy, and feedback from the job itself, supporting convergent validity. Regression analysis supported criterion-related validity, while the Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT), the Fornell-Larcker criterion, and model comparison all supported discriminant validity. Discussion: The resulting scale is a valid instrument for measuring attitudes toward technical and sociotechnical infrastructure in software engineering research. Our work contributes to ongoing efforts to integrate psychological measurement rigor into empirical and behavioral software engineering research.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

A Multifaceted View on Discrimination in Software Development Careers

Conversations around diversity and inclusion in software engineering often focus on gender and racial disparities. However, the State of Devs 2025 survey with 8,717 participants revealed that other forms of discrimination are similarly prevalent but receive considerably less attention. This includes discrimination based on age, political perspective, disabilities, or cognitive differences such as neurodivergence. We conducted a secondary analysis of 800 open-ended survey responses to examine patterns of perceived discrimination, as well as related challenges and negative impacts. Our study covers multiple identity facets, including age, gender, race, and disability. We found that age- and gender-related discrimination was the most frequently reported workplace issue, but discrimination based on political and religious views emerged as further notable concerns. Most of the participants who identified as female cited gender as the primary source of discrimination, often accompanied by intersectional factors such as race, political views, age, or sexual orientation. Discrimination related to caregiving responsibilities was reported by all gender identities. Regarding the negative impacts of workplace issues, many participants described modifying their appearance or behavior in response to gender biases. Gender also appeared to influence broader career challenges, as women and non-binary respondents reported experiencing almost all workplace issues at higher rates, particularly discrimination (35%) and mental health challenges (62%). Our goal is to raise awareness in the research community that discrimination in software development is multifaceted, and to encourage researchers to select and assess relevant facets beyond age and gender when designing software engineering studies.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Lost in Transition: The Struggle of Women Returning to Software Engineering Research after Career Breaks

The IT industry provides supportive pathways such as returnship programs, coding boot camps, and buddy systems for women re-entering their job after a career break. Academia, however, offers limited opportunities to motivate women to return. We propose a diverse multicultural research project investigating the challenges faced by women with software engineering (SE) backgrounds re-entering academia or related research roles after a career break. Career disruptions due to pregnancy, immigration status, or lack of flexible work options can significantly impact women's career progress, creating barriers for returning as lecturers, professors, or senior researchers. Although many companies promote gender diversity policies, such measures are less prominent and often under-recognized within academic institutions. Our goal is to explore the specific challenges women encounter when re-entering academic roles compared to industry roles; to understand the institutional perspective, including a comparative analysis of existing policies and opportunities in different countries for women to return to the field; and finally, to provide recommendations that support transparent hiring practices. The research project will be carried out in multiple universities and in multiple countries to capture the diverse challenges and policies that vary by location.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Mind the Ethics! The Overlooked Ethical Dimensions of GenAI in Software Modeling Education

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly gaining momentum in software modeling education, embraced by both students and educators. As GenAI assists with interpreting requirements, formalizing models, and translating students' mental models into structured notations, it increasingly shapes core learning outcomes such as domain comprehension, diagrammatic thinking, and modeling fluency without clear ethical oversight or pedagogical guidelines. Yet, the ethical implications of this integration remain underexplored. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review across six major digital libraries in computer science (ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Web of Science). Our aim is to identify studies discussing the ethical aspects of GenAI in software modeling education, including responsibility, fairness, transparency, diversity, and inclusion among others. Out of 1,386 unique papers initially retrieved, only three explicitly addressed ethical considerations. This scarcity highlights the critical absence of ethical discourse surrounding GenAI in modeling education and raises urgent questions about the responsible integration of AI in modeling curricula, as well as it evinces the pressing need for structured ethical frameworks in this emerging educational landscape. We examine these three studies and explore the emerging research opportunities as well as the challenges that have arisen in this field.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Exploring Actions, Interactions and Challenges in Software Modelling Tasks: An Empirical Investigation with Students

Background: Software modelling is a creative yet challenging task. Modellers often find themselves lost in the process, from understanding the modelling problem to solving it with proper modelling strategies and modelling tools. Students learning modelling often get overwhelmed with the notations and tools. To teach students systematic modelling, we must investigate students' practical modelling knowledge and the challenges they face while modelling. Aim: We aim to explore students' modelling knowledge and modelling actions. Further, we want to investigate students' challenges while solving a modelling task on specific modelling tools. Method: We conducted an empirical study by observing 16 pairs of students from two universities and countries solving modelling tasks for one hour. Results: We find distinct patterns of modelling of class and sequence diagrams based on individual modelling styles, the tools' interface and modelling knowledge. We observed how modelling tools influence students' modelling styles and how they can be used to foster students' confidence and creativity. Based on these observations, we developed a set of guidelines aimed at enhancing modelling education and helping students acquire practical modelling skills. Conclusions: The guidance for modelling in education needs to be structured and systematic. Our findings reveal that different modelling styles exist, which should be properly studied. It is essential to nurture the creative aspect of a modeller, particularly while they are still students. Therefore, selecting the right tool is important, and students should understand how a tool can influence their modelling style.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Human Factors in Model-Driven Engineering: Future Research Goals and Initiatives for MDE

Purpose: Software modelling and Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is traditionally studied from a technical perspective. However, one of the core motivations behind the use of software models is inherently human-centred. Models aim to enable practitioners to communicate about software designs, make software understandable, or make software easier to write through domain-specific modelling languages. Several recent studies challenge the idea that these aims can always be reached and indicate that human factors play a role in the success of MDE. However, there is an under-representation of research focusing on human factors in modelling. Methods: During a GI-Dagstuhl seminar, topics related to human factors in modelling were discussed by 26 expert participants from research and industry. Results: In breakout groups, five topics were covered in depth, namely modelling human aspects, factors of modeller experience, diversity and inclusion in MDE, collaboration and MDE, and teaching human-aware MDE. Conclusion: We summarise our insights gained during the discussions on the five topics. We formulate research goals, questions, and propositions that support directing future initiatives towards an MDE community that is aware of and supportive of human factors and values.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2023

We Do Not Understand What It Says -- Studying Student Perceptions of Software Modelling

Background: Despite the potential benefits of software modelling, developers have shown a considerable reluctance towards its application. There is substantial existing research studying industrial use and technical challenges of modelling. However, there is a lack of detailed empirical work investigating how students perceive modelling. Aim: We investigate the perceptions of students towards modelling in a university environment. Method: We conducted a multiple case study with 5 cases (5 courses from 3 universities) and two units of analysis (student and instructor). We collected data through 21 semi-structured interviews, which we analysed using in-vivo coding and thematic analysis. Results: Students see some benefits of modelling, e.g., using models for planning and communicating within the group. However, several factors negatively influence their understanding of modelling, e.g., assignments with unclear expectations, irregular and insufficient feedback on their models, and lack of experience with the problem domains. Conclusions: Our findings help in understanding better why students struggle with software modelling, and might be reluctant to adopt it later on. This could help to improve education and training in software modelling, both at university and in industry. Specifically, we recommend that educators try to provide feedback beyond syntactical issues, and to consider using problem domains that students are knowledgeable about.

cs.SE↗