Seungdeok Roh | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

A Gingerbread House for LLM Agents: Source-Planned Honeypots That Lure Autonomous Attackers into an Isolated Shadow

LLM agents can exploit web vulnerabilities fast enough that patching may come too late. Deception against such agents has mostly lured them away from a real target that stays reachable. We study a different arrangement: an LLM defender plans a static honeypot from the application's source, and a router sends every later request of a client it confirms as an attacker, including a working exploit, to an isolated shadow copy. We compare no defence, this static plan, and an augmented configuration with a runtime LLM responder and further router rules, graded by the benchmark's own grader on the real target and, for ARTEX, also on the shadow. On the 40 critical CVE-Bench tasks the static plan cut real compromise from 26/40 to 5/40 for Claude Opus 4.8 and from 20/40 to 0/40 (31 valid runs) for the ARTEX attack framework. On 20 new tasks not used in the design, ARTEX went from 15/20 to 0/20. In about half of the deception-arm runs ARTEX's exploit succeeded on the shadow while the real target stayed intact: the defence moved a working exploit rather than stopping it, and the remaining risk lies in requests that reach the real target before confirmation. ARTEX reported a planted fake secret as genuine on 30 of the 120 deception-arm tasks, five times in a report that labelled another item a decoy. With ARTEX's real compromise at zero in both deception configurations, they did not differ significantly on the remaining outcomes, a comparison that does not isolate the responder.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Robustness Analysis against Adversarial Patch Attacks in Fully Unmanned Stores

The advent of convenient and efficient fully unmanned stores equipped with artificial intelligence-based automated checkout systems marks a new era in retail. However, these systems have inherent artificial intelligence security vulnerabilities, which are exploited via adversarial patch attacks, particularly in physical environments. This study demonstrated that adversarial patches can severely disrupt object detection models used in unmanned stores, leading to issues such as theft, inventory discrepancies, and interference. We investigated three types of adversarial patch attacks -- Hiding, Creating, and Altering attacks -- and highlighted their effectiveness. We also introduce the novel color histogram similarity loss function by leveraging attacker knowledge of the color information of a target class object. Besides the traditional confusion-matrix-based attack success rate, we introduce a new bounding-boxes-based metric to analyze the practical impact of these attacks. Starting with attacks on object detection models trained on snack and fruit datasets in a digital environment, we evaluated the effectiveness of adversarial patches in a physical testbed that mimicked a real unmanned store with RGB cameras and realistic conditions. Furthermore, we assessed the robustness of these attacks in black-box scenarios, demonstrating that shadow attacks can enhance success rates of attacks even without direct access to model parameters. Our study underscores the necessity for robust defense strategies to protect unmanned stores from adversarial threats. Highlighting the limitations of the current defense mechanisms in real-time detection systems and discussing various proactive measures, we provide insights into improving the robustness of object detection models and fortifying unmanned retail environments against these attacks.

cs.CR↗