arXiv subjects

Sana Belguith

Publications and source records attributed to Sana Belguith.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

NeuronFuzz: Safety Neuron Guided Fuzzing for LLM Safety Evaluation

Safety evaluation is critical for assessing whether aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) remain robust against jailbreak attacks. Existing automated testing methods, however, largely rely on response-level feedback: each candidate prompt typically requires generating a target-model response to evaluate its attack effectiveness. This process is expensive and, more importantly, provides only sparse guidance on strongly aligned models, where most candidates are rejected with the same failure outcome. This paper presents NeuronFuzz, a white-box fuzzing framework that exploits internal safety neurons as continuous execution feedback for LLM safety evaluation. A SafetyOracle converts safety-neuron activations into a continuous safety alarm score that serves as feedback for fuzzing and can be obtained during prefill, eliminating response generation from the fuzzing loop. To construct the SafetyOracle, NeuronFuzz uses template-invariant harmful and benign inputs and stability-aware selection to identify a compact set of safety neurons whose activations capture harmful-intent recognition. Moreover, since the safety alarm score is differentiable, NeuronFuzz uses its gradients to identify safety-sensitive template positions and a masked language model to generate fluent, context-compatible mutations while preserving original harmful payload and avoiding additional optimization variables. We evaluate NeuronFuzz across 21 text and multimodal models. Across five white-box source models, it achieves a 76-100% jailbreak discovery rate, outperforming baselines by up to 48 percentage points. Its optimized templates further transfer zero-shot to open-weight and six proprietary target models, achieving average ASR and top-5 ensemble ASR (EASR) of 69.6%/92.6% and 44.1%/60.0%, respectively.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

RouteHijack: Routing-Aware Attack on Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

Safety alignment is critical for the responsible deployment of large language models (LLMs). As Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures are increasingly adopted to scale model capacity, understanding their safety robustness becomes essential. Existing adversarial attacks, however, have notable limitations. Prompt-based jailbreaks rely on heuristic search and transfer poorly, model intervention methods require privileged access to internal representations, and optimization-based input attacks remain output-centric and are fundamentally limited to MoE models due to the non-differentiable routing mechanism. In this paper, we present RouteHijack, a routing-aware jailbreak for MoE LLMs. Our key insight is that safety behavior is concentrated in a small subset of experts, creating an opportunity to steer model behavior by influencing routing decisions through input optimization. Building on this observation, RouteHijack first performs response-driven expert localization to identify safety-critical and harmful experts by contrasting activations under safe refusals and harmful completions. It then constructs adversarial suffixes with a routing-aware objective that suppresses safety experts, promotes harmful experts, and prevents early-stage refusal during generation. At inference time, the optimized suffix is appended to a malicious prompt, requiring only input access. Across seven MoE LLMs, RouteHijack achieves a 69.3\% average attack success rate (ASR), outperforming prior optimization-based attack by $3.2\times$. RouteHijack also transfers zero-shot across five sibling MoE variants, raising average ASR from 27.7\% to 61.2\%, and further generalizes to three MoE-based VLMs, increasing average ASR from 2.47\% to 38.7\%. These findings expose a fundamental vulnerability in sparse expert architectures and highlight the need for defenses beyond output-level alignment.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Progressive Behavioral Drift through Compression Valleys in Large Language Models

We show that attention sinks and compression valleys create a vulnerable region in decoder-only Transformers, where small activation perturbations can be amplified through the autoregressive trajectory. Based on this, we propose Sensitivity-Scaled Steering (SSS), a progressive activation-space attack that anchors perturbations at the beginning-of-sequence token and adaptively reinforces them at sensitive layers and tokens. Instead of forcing an abrupt behavioral change, SSS induces a staged drift, making outputs gradually shift toward the target behavior while remaining fluent and benign-looking in early generations. Across multiple open-weight models and four behavioral axes, SSS achieves high attack success, preserves coherence, and causes negligible degradation to general capabilities. These results show that attention sinks and compression valleys are not merely mechanistic features; rather, they expose exploitable amplification mechanisms that can be treated as hidden-state weaknesses for activation-space attacks in white-box and supply-chain LLM deployments.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

The dark deep side of DeepSeek: Fine-tuning attacks against the safety alignment of CoT-enabled models

Large language models are typically trained on vast amounts of data during the pre-training phase, which may include some potentially harmful information. Fine-tuning attacks can exploit this by prompting the model to reveal such behaviours, leading to the generation of harmful content. In this paper, we focus on investigating the performance of the Chain of Thought based reasoning model, DeepSeek, when subjected to fine-tuning attacks. Specifically, we explore how fine-tuning manipulates the model's output, exacerbating the harmfulness of its responses while examining the interaction between the Chain of Thought reasoning and adversarial inputs. Through this study, we aim to shed light on the vulnerability of Chain of Thought enabled models to fine-tuning attacks and the implications for their safety and ethical deployment.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Beyond Security-by-design: Securing a compromised system

Digital infrastructures are seeing convergence and connectivity at unprecedented scale. This is true for both current critical national infrastructures and emerging future systems that are highly cyber-physical in nature with complex intersections between humans and technologies, e.g., smart cities, intelligent transportation, high-value manufacturing and Industry 4.0. Diverse legacy and non-legacy software systems underpinned by heterogeneous hardware compose on-the-fly to deliver services to millions of users with varying requirements and unpredictable actions. This complexity is compounded by intricate and complicated supply-chains with many digital assets and services outsourced to third parties. The reality is that, at any particular point in time, there will be untrusted, partially-trusted or compromised elements across the infrastructure. Given this reality, and the societal scale of digital infrastructures, delivering secure and resilient operations is a major challenge. We argue that this requires us to move beyond the paradigm of security-by-design and embrace the challenge of securing-a-compromised-system.

cs.CR↗