arXiv subjects

Sam Yu-Te Lee

Publications and source records attributed to Sam Yu-Te Lee.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Design Study on Voice-based Interaction for Immersive Network Visualization and Analysis

Visual network analysis leverages network visualization authoring techniques to facilitate sensemaking, serendipitous discovery, and hypothesis verification on network data. However, transferring the same paradigm to immersive environments is non-trivial due to insufficient UI affordance for authoring operations. Researchers have studied combining multiple modalities for interactions, but the high learning curve of such input systems limits their adoption by typical data analysts, let alone for network analytics. In this work, we investigate the advantages and limitations of voice as the primary input modality with a research-through-design (RtD) study, in which we design a system that supports voice-based interactions for immersive network visualization facilitated by Large Language Models (LLMs). Through a user study on social network data analysis with participants from social science and computer science backgrounds, we find that voice interactions can improve perceived usability relative to controller-based interaction and lower the cognitive effort of formulating commands, since users can express intent in natural language rather than compressing it into terse instructions. We discuss design implications for immersive visualizations, highlighting how usability limits adoption while simplified interactions and voice-based controls enhance fluidity and support complex, multi-parameter operations.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Vibe Visualizing: How Visualization Novices Try (and Fail) to Generate and Interpret Visualizations with Conversational AI

Conversational AI has enabled users to generate and interpret visualizations through natural language, significantly lowering the technical barrier to entry. The increased accessibility brings visualization novices into data visualization, but also exposes them to misinformation and misinterpretations. We are motivated to examine what issues can arise in interactions with current conversational AI, whether visualization novices can recognize such issues, and how they respond to them. To examine these questions, we conducted a user study on ChatGPT with 20 visualization novices, collecting their conversation logs, semi-structured interview transcripts, and Likert-scale questionnaire responses. Through thematic analysis, we developed a codebook that covers AI execution compliance, issues of AI-generated visualizations, patterns of AI responses, and prompting patterns of users. We summarized four themes, including the quality of outcomes, recurring errors from ChatGPT, misuse by users, factors that affect user trust, confidence, and verification behavior, and human-AI collaboration dynamics. To demonstrate the generalizability of our codebook and findings, we replayed the initial user prompts on Gemini and Claude and compared the outcomes, which revealed distinct failure modes for each model. Based on the results of all analyses, we derive a set of design recommendations for future AI-assisted visualization systems. We conclude with discussions on literacy gaps, diverse human-AI collaboration dynamics, and implications for agentic visualization.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

VArify: A Visual Analytics System for Verifying Knowledge Enhanced Large Language Model Responses in Food Science

Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to leverage structured, domain-specific knowledge graph databases for factually grounded responses. However, the retrieval of irrelevant or conflicting data can still result in erroneous responses. In knowledge-intensive and evidence-focused domains, human verification of the supporting evidence for an LLM response is still necessary. We conducted a formative pilot study to characterize the challenges of verifying complex, multi-layered data retrieved by GraphRAG systems. Based on these insights, we present VArify, a visual analytics system that leverages a file directory-inspired tree visualization to support simultaneous exploration of inter-group relationships and intra-group hierarchies within the retrieved evidence. We evaluate VArify through a user study with six food science experts and students. Our results indicate that the system effectively helps users distinguish between an LLM's internal parametric knowledge and external graph-sourced evidence. Furthermore, the visualization helped experts identify inaccuracies within the underlying knowledge graph itself, leading to more calibrated trust in the model's output. We conclude by discussing opportunities to leverage visualizations to further support verification regarding unknown unknowns, personalization, and limitations of knowledge graphs.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

VizCopilot: Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Enterprise Chatbots with Context Visualization

Enterprise chatbots show promise in supporting knowledge workers in information synthesis tasks by retrieving context from large, heterogeneous databases before generating answers. However, when the retrieved context misaligns with user intentions, the chatbot often produces "irrelevantly right" responses that provide little value. In this work, we introduce VizCopilot, a prototype that incorporates visualization techniques to actively involve end-users in context alignment. By combining topic modeling with document visualization, VizCopilot enables human oversight and modification of retrieved context while keeping cognitive overhead manageable. We used VizCopilot as a design probe in a Research-through-Design study to evaluate the role of visualization in context alignment and to surface future design opportunities. Our findings show that visualization not only helps users detect and correct misaligned context but also encourages them to adapt their prompting strategies, enabling the system to retrieve more relevant context from the outset. At the same time, the study reveals limitations in verification support regarding close-reading and trust in AI summaries. We outline future directions for visualization-enhanced chatbots, focusing on personalization, proactivity, and sustainable human-AI collaboration.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

VIDEE: Visual and Interactive Decomposition, Execution, and Evaluation of Text Analytics with Intelligent Agents

Text analytics has traditionally required specialized knowledge in Natural Language Processing (NLP) or text analysis, which presents a barrier for entry-level analysts. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have changed the landscape of NLP by enabling more accessible and automated text analysis (e.g., topic detection, summarization, information extraction, etc.). We introduce VIDEE, a system that supports entry-level data analysts to conduct advanced text analytics with intelligent agents. VIDEE instantiates a human-agent collaroration workflow consisting of three stages: (1) Decomposition, which incorporates a human-in-the-loop Monte-Carlo Tree Search algorithm to support generative reasoning with human feedback, (2) Execution, which generates an executable text analytics pipeline, and (3) Evaluation, which integrates LLM-based evaluation and visualizations to support user validation of execution results. We conduct two quantitative experiments to evaluate VIDEE's effectiveness and analyze common agent errors. A user study involving participants with varying levels of NLP and text analytics experience -- from none to expert -- demonstrates the system's usability and reveals distinct user behavior patterns. The findings identify design implications for human-agent collaboration, validate the practical utility of VIDEE for non-expert users, and inform future improvements to intelligent text analytics systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Visual Text Mining with Progressive Taxonomy Construction for Environmental Studies

Environmental experts have developed the DPSIR (Driver, Pressure, State, Impact, Response) framework to systematically study and communicate key relationships between society and the environment. Using this framework requires experts to construct a DPSIR taxonomy from a corpus, annotate the documents, and identify DPSIR variables and relationships, which is laborious and inflexible. Automating it with conventional text mining faces technical challenges, primarily because the taxonomy often begins with abstract definitions, which experts progressively refine and contextualize as they annotate the corpus. In response, we develop GreenMine, a system that supports interactive text mining with prompt engineering. The system implements a prompting pipeline consisting of three simple and evaluable subtasks. In each subtask, the DPSIR taxonomy can be defined in natural language and iteratively refined as experts analyze the corpus. To support users evaluate the taxonomy, we introduce an uncertainty score based on response consistency. Then, we design a radial uncertainty chart that visualizes uncertainties and corpus topics, which supports interleaved evaluation and exploration. Using the system, experts can progressively construct the DPSIR taxonomy and annotate the corpus with LLMs. Using real-world interview transcripts, we present a case study to demonstrate the capability of the system in supporting interactive mining of DPSIR relationships, and an expert review in the form of collaborative discussion to understand the potential and limitations of the system. We discuss the lessons learned from developing the system and future opportunities for supporting interactive text mining in knowledge-intensive tasks for other application scenarios.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Towards Dataset-scale and Feature-oriented Evaluation of Text Summarization in Large Language Model Prompts

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Prompt Engineering have made chatbot customization more accessible, significantly reducing barriers to tasks that previously required programming skills. However, prompt evaluation, especially at the dataset scale, remains complex due to the need to assess prompts across thousands of test instances within a dataset. Our study, based on a comprehensive literature review and pilot study, summarized five critical challenges in prompt evaluation. In response, we introduce a feature-oriented workflow for systematic prompt evaluation. In the context of text summarization, our workflow advocates evaluation with summary characteristics (feature metrics) such as complexity, formality, or naturalness, instead of using traditional quality metrics like ROUGE. This design choice enables a more user-friendly evaluation of prompts, as it guides users in sorting through the ambiguity inherent in natural language. To support this workflow, we introduce Awesum, a visual analytics system that facilitates identifying optimal prompt refinements for text summarization through interactive visualizations, featuring a novel Prompt Comparator design that employs a BubbleSet-inspired design enhanced by dimensionality reduction techniques. We evaluate the effectiveness and general applicability of the system with practitioners from various domains and found that (1) our design helps overcome the learning curve for non-technical people to conduct a systematic evaluation of summarization prompts, and (2) our feature-oriented workflow has the potential to generalize to other NLG and image-generation tasks. For future works, we advocate moving towards feature-oriented evaluation of LLM prompts and discuss unsolved challenges in terms of human-agent interaction.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

HINTs: Sensemaking on large collections of documents with Hypergraph visualization and INTelligent agents

Sensemaking on a large collection of documents (corpus) is a challenging task often found in fields such as market research, legal studies, intelligence analysis, political science, computational linguistics, etc. Previous works approach this problem either from a topic- or entity-based perspective, but they lack interpretability and trust due to poor model alignment. In this paper, we present HINTs, a visual analytics approach that combines topic- and entity-based techniques seamlessly and integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) as both a general NLP task solver and an intelligent agent. By leveraging the extraction capability of LLMs in the data preparation stage, we model the corpus as a hypergraph that matches the user's mental model when making sense of the corpus. The constructed hypergraph is hierarchically organized with an agglomerative clustering algorithm by combining semantic and connectivity similarity. The system further integrates an LLM-based intelligent chatbot agent in the interface to facilitate sensemaking. To demonstrate the generalizability and effectiveness of the HINTs system, we present two case studies on different domains and a comparative user study. We report our insights on the behavior patterns and challenges when intelligent agents are used to facilitate sensemaking. We find that while intelligent agents can address many challenges in sensemaking, the visual hints that visualizations provide are necessary to address the new problems brought by intelligent agents. We discuss limitations and future work for combining interactive visualization and LLMs more profoundly to better support corpus analysis.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

NOVA: A visual interface for assessing polarizing media coverage

Within the United States, the majority of the populace receives their news online. U.S mainstream media outlets both generate and influence the news consumed by U.S citizens. Many of these citizens have their personal beliefs about these outlets and question the fairness of their reporting. We offer an interactive visualization system for the public to assess their perception of the mainstream media's coverage of a topic against the data. Our system combines belief elicitation techniques and narrative structure designs, emphasizing transparency and user-friendliness to facilitate users' self-assessment on personal beliefs. We gathered $\sim${25k} articles from the span of 2020-2022 from six mainstream media outlets as a testbed. To evaluate our system, we present usage scenarios alongside a user study with a qualitative analysis of user exploration strategies for personal belief assessment. We report our observations from this study and discuss future work and challenges of developing tools for the public to assess media outlet coverage and belief updating on provocative topics.

cs.HC↗