Ryan Christian | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

CTSpinoPelvic1K: spine, pelvis, ribs and femora in one coordinate frame, annotated for lumbosacral transitional anatomy

Purpose: A vertebra at the lumbosacral junction is named by counting caudally from C2 on whole-spine imaging, but a lumbar case is planned on lumbar-only imaging (T12 to S1), without C2. Abdominopelvic CT holds that span plus the lowest ribs and pelvis. Where a lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) alters the count, the local anatomy is ambiguous: four rib-free vertebrae may be an L1 with a lumbar rib or an L5 assimilated to the sacrum, and six may be a sixth lumbar vertebra, a T12 with aplastic ribs, or a lumbarized S1. CTSpinoPelvic1K asks whether local morphology resolves it without the count. CTSpine1K's vertebrae and CTPelvic1K's pelvis covered these patients but were never joined; this release joins them on one series and adds the bones neither had. It provides 802 CT records with per-level ribs and femora, levels anchored on the lowest rib-bearing vertebra and S1, and classes for L6, T13, a separate S1 and lumbar ribs, so anomalies are recorded as such. Acquisition and Validation Methods: Records pair CTSpine1K and CTPelvic1K labels on each patient's bone-richest series under a VerSe-native scheme. Validation covered geometric invariants (802/802 pass), rib-vertebra incidence across 5,749 ribs (0.035% offset), and spinopelvic measures matching published values. Data Format and Usage Notes: NIfTI image/label pairs with patient-grouped LSTV-stratified five-fold splits and a loader; archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22139642. Potential Applications: Classifying a vertebra from local features; updating cadaveric morphometry; spinopelvic assessment; opportunistic screening; and, absent a public preoperative lumbar cohort, surgical planning research (377 records prone). Limitations: thoracic ground truth is field-of-view limited; postural angles supine; no held-out test set; ribs are triaged-review pseudolabels; Castellvi grades two-reader consensus on 33 records.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2021

Ontology-driven Knowledge Graph for Android Malware

We present MalONT2.0 -- an ontology for malware threat intelligence \cite{rastogi2020malont}. New classes (attack patterns, infrastructural resources to enable attacks, malware analysis to incorporate static analysis, and dynamic analysis of binaries) and relations have been added following a broadened scope of core competency questions. MalONT2.0 allows researchers to extensively capture all requisite classes and relations that gather semantic and syntactic characteristics of an android malware attack. This ontology forms the basis for the malware threat intelligence knowledge graph, MalKG, which we exemplify using three different, non-overlapping demonstrations. Malware features have been extracted from CTI reports on android threat intelligence shared on the Internet and written in the form of unstructured text. Some of these sources are blogs, threat intelligence reports, tweets, and news articles. The smallest unit of information that captures malware features is written as triples comprising head and tail entities, each connected with a relation. In the poster and demonstration, we discuss MalONT2.0, MalKG, as well as the dynamically growing knowledge graph, TINKER.

cs.CR↗