Runmei Li | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

When Depth Hurts: Reliability-Aware Geometry Distillation for Depth-Free RGB-D Salient Object Detection

Depth can resolve appearance ambiguity in RGB-D salient object detection (SOD), yet sensor depth is not uniformly reliable. Missing regions, blurred boundaries, and structural artifacts can propagate through multimodal fusion and make an RGB-D detector less accurate than its RGB-only counterpart. Existing quality-aware approaches regulate observed depth but remain dependent on the same potentially defective modality. We propose \method, a reliability-aware geometry distillation framework developed for RGB-D SOD benchmarks without using dataset-provided depth during training or inference. A frozen Depth Anything V2 model serves only as a training-time teacher, transferring dense relative geometry, hierarchical spatial attention, and boundary structure to a compact edge-aware geometry branch. Pooled bidirectional interaction aligns geometry with appearance, and a pixel-wise reliability estimator selectively injects geometry that is compatible with the current RGB representation. The teacher is removed after training, leaving an RGB-only inference network. Trained on 2,985 RGB-mask pairs, \method{} achieves the best or tied-best result in 26 of 36 metric-dataset comparisons against ten recent RGB-D SOD methods, including a 13.4\% relative MAE reduction on ReDWeb-S. When retrained on DUTS-TR, it also improves the strongest prior $F$-measure by 4.2\% on PASCAL-S, showing that the distilled geometry transfers beyond a particular sensor or dataset domain. Code will be released upon publication.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

RailVQA: A Benchmark and Framework for Efficient Interpretable Visual Cognition in Automatic Train Operation

As Automatic Train Operation (ATO) advances toward GoA4 and beyond, it increasingly depends on efficient, reliable cab-view visual perception and decision-oriented inference to ensure safe operation in complex and dynamic railway environments. However, existing approaches focus primarily on basic perception and often generalize poorly to rare yet safety-critical corner cases. They also lack the high-level reasoning and planning capabilities required for operational decision-making. Although recent Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) show strong generalization and cognitive capabilities, their use in safety-critical ATO is hindered by high computational cost and hallucination risk. Meanwhile, reliable domain-specific benchmarks for systematically evaluating cognitive capabilities are still lacking. To address these gaps, we introduce RailVQA-bench, the first VQA benchmark for cab-view visual cognition in ATO, comprising 20,000 single-frame and 1,168 video based QA pairs to evaluate cognitive generalization and interpretability in both static and dynamic scenarios. Furthermore, we propose RailVQA-CoM, a collaborative large-small model framework that combines small-model efficiency with large-model cognition via a transparent three-module architecture and adaptive temporal sampling, improving perceptual generalization and enabling more efficient reasoning and planning. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach substantially improves performance, enhances interpretability, improves efficiency, and strengthens cross-domain generalization in autonomous driving systems. Code and datasets will be available at https://cybereye-bjtu.github.io/RailVQA.html.

cs.CV↗